• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术在当地社区医院的安全性与可行性:与传统四孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的回顾性比较

Safety and feasibility for single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy in local community hospital: a retrospective comparison with conventional 4-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

作者信息

Ikeda Naoya, Ueno Masato, Kanamura Tetsuhiro, Kojima Yu, Nakagawa Kenji, Ishioka Kohei, Sasaki Yoshiyuki, Sho Masayuki, Sakaguchi Hiroshi, Hidaka Shoko, Ochi Tomoko, Nakajima Yoshiyuki

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Nara Prefectural Mimuro Hospital, Nara, Japan.

出版信息

Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2013 Feb;23(1):33-6. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31827577f8.

DOI:10.1097/SLE.0b013e31827577f8
PMID:23386147
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility for single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) by retrospective comparison with conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC) in a local community hospital.

METHODS

SILC was introduced and performed in 57 patients for benign gallbladder diseases. Their clinical data were compared with those of 62 patients treated with CLC. They included patient demographic data and operative outcomes.

RESULTS

SILC was attempted in 57 patients and 52 cases (91.2%) were successfully completed. There were no statistical differences between the 2 groups in terms of operative time, blood loss, and postoperative complications. The length of hospital stay in the SILC group was significantly shorter compared with CLC (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

SILC has been successfully introduced in a local community hospital. The safety and feasibility was also confirmed. The SILC procedure may become 1 standard option for the treatment of benign gallbladder diseases.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在通过在当地社区医院将单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术(SILC)与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术(CLC)进行回顾性比较,评估其安全性和可行性。

方法

对57例患有良性胆囊疾病的患者实施了SILC。将他们的临床数据与62例接受CLC治疗的患者的数据进行比较。这些数据包括患者人口统计学数据和手术结果。

结果

57例患者尝试进行SILC,52例(91.2%)成功完成。两组在手术时间、出血量和术后并发症方面无统计学差异。与CLC相比,SILC组的住院时间明显更短(P < 0.0001)。

结论

SILC已在当地社区医院成功开展。其安全性和可行性也得到了证实。SILC手术可能成为治疗良性胆囊疾病的一种标准选择。

相似文献

1
Safety and feasibility for single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy in local community hospital: a retrospective comparison with conventional 4-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术在当地社区医院的安全性与可行性:与传统四孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的回顾性比较
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2013 Feb;23(1):33-6. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31827577f8.
2
Randomized clinical trial of single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: short-term operative outcomes.单孔与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术的随机临床试验:短期手术结果
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2011 Oct;21(5):311-3. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31822cfacd.
3
Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with uncomplicated gallbladder disease: a meta-analysis.单纯性胆囊疾病患者单孔与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术的Meta分析
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012 Dec;22(6):487-97. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3182685d0a.
4
Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy using glove port in comparison with standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy SILC using glove port.使用手套端口的单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术与使用手套端口的标准腹腔镜胆囊切除术的比较 单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术使用手套端口
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012 Feb;22(1):17-20. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e318242e12a.
5
A comparison between single-incision and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术的比较。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2012 Jun;22(5):443-7. doi: 10.1089/lap.2011.0476. Epub 2012 Apr 27.
6
Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: comparison analysis of feasibility and safety.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术:可行性与安全性的比较分析
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012 Apr;22(2):108-13. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3182456e3b.
7
From multi-incision to single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy step-by-step: one surgeon's self-taught experience and retrospective analysis.从多孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术到单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术:一位外科医生的自学经验和回顾性分析。
Asian J Surg. 2013 Jan;36(1):1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2012.06.002. Epub 2012 Jul 25.
8
Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy using conventional instruments: early experience in comparison with the gold standard.使用传统器械的单切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术:与金标准相比的早期经验
J Am Coll Surg. 2009 Nov;209(5):632-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.07.020. Epub 2009 Sep 11.
9
Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy--can we afford that? Cost comparison of different surgical techniques.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术——我们负担得起吗?不同手术技术的成本比较。
Pol Przegl Chir. 2014 Apr;86(4):177-80. doi: 10.2478/pjs-2014-0032.
10
Comparison of postoperative pain between single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: prospective case-control study.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术术后疼痛的比较:前瞻性病例对照研究。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012 Feb;22(1):25-8. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e318242ea44.

引用本文的文献

1
Higher cost of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy due to longer operating time. A study of opportunity cost based on meta-analysis.单切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术因手术时间较长导致成本更高。一项基于荟萃分析的机会成本研究。
G Chir. 2018 Jan-Feb;39(1):24-34. doi: 10.11138/gchir/2018.39.1.024.
2
Simple technique for gasless transumbilical single-incisional laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy.无气经脐单切口腹腔镜辅助阑尾切除术的简易技术
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2014 Mar;399(3):359-66. doi: 10.1007/s00423-014-1164-z. Epub 2014 Jan 22.