Suppr超能文献

一项1期随机开放标签交叉研究,旨在评估以片剂和胶囊剂形式给予健康受试者400 mg阿巴康唑的安全性和药代动力学。

A Phase 1, randomized, open-label crossover study to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics of 400 mg albaconazole administered to healthy participants as a tablet formulation versus a capsule formulation.

作者信息

van Rossem Koen, Lowe Jenny A

机构信息

Stiefel, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.

出版信息

Clin Pharmacol. 2013;5:23-31. doi: 10.2147/CPAA.S39600. Epub 2013 Jan 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Albaconazole is a novel triazole being developed for the oral treatment of fungal diseases. Once-weekly oral dosing with 400 mg albaconazole for 24 or 36 weeks resulted in high rates of clinical and mycological resolution for distal subungual onychomycosis, as well as a favorable safety and tolerability profile.

PURPOSE

To compare four 100-mg albaconazole capsules to one 400-mg albaconazole tablet for bioavailability, bioequivalence, tolerability, and safety.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty participants were enrolled in this Phase I, open-label, two-sequence crossover study. Twenty participants were exposed to a single 400-mg tablet dose of albaconazole before being crossed over to a single dose of four 100-mg albaconazole capsules. The second group of 20 participants received the study products in reverse order. Blood samples were taken over 15 days post-dose to assess the plasma concentrations and pharmacokinetic parameters of albaconazole and its primary metabolite, 6-hydroxyalbaconazole. Safety was assessed throughout the study.

RESULTS

The area under the curve (AUC) and maximum measured plasma concentration (C(max)) of the albaconazole tablet were approximately 10% and 22% lower, respectively, than for the albaconazole capsules. Statistical significance was reached for the C(max) but not for the AUC measurements (AUC(0-t) and AUC(0-inf)). Because the 90% confidence intervals based on the differences between the tablet and capsule were outside the 80%-125% range for both the C(max) and AUC, we concluded that the formulations were not bioequivalent with respect to the rate or extent of absorption. Both formulations were safe and well-tolerated in this study. All adverse events (AEs) were generally mild and were mainly gastrointestinal- or nervous system-related (eg, dizziness, headache). No electrocardiogram findings were reported as an AE, and no serious AEs or deaths were reported.

CONCLUSION

The AUC and C(max) of albaconazole after a single 400-mg oral dose administered as a tablet formulation were lower than those of a capsule formulation. Albaconazole tablets and capsules cannot, therefore, be considered bioequivalent.

摘要

背景

阿巴康唑是一种正在研发用于口服治疗真菌疾病的新型三唑类药物。每周一次口服400毫克阿巴康唑,持续24或36周,对于远端甲下甲真菌病可实现较高的临床和真菌学治愈率,且安全性和耐受性良好。

目的

比较四粒100毫克阿巴康唑胶囊与一片400毫克阿巴康唑片剂的生物利用度、生物等效性、耐受性和安全性。

患者和方法

40名参与者入选了这项I期、开放标签、双序列交叉研究。20名参与者先接受单次400毫克阿巴康唑片剂剂量,然后交叉接受单次四粒100毫克阿巴康唑胶囊剂量。第二组20名参与者按相反顺序接受研究产品。给药后15天内采集血样,以评估阿巴康唑及其主要代谢产物6-羟基阿巴康唑的血浆浓度和药代动力学参数。在整个研究过程中评估安全性。

结果

阿巴康唑片剂的曲线下面积(AUC)和最大测得血浆浓度(C(max))分别比阿巴康唑胶囊低约10%和22%。C(max)达到了统计学显著性,但AUC测量值(AUC(0-t)和AUC(0-inf))未达到。由于基于片剂和胶囊差异的90%置信区间在C(max)和AUC的80%-125%范围之外,我们得出结论,两种制剂在吸收速率或程度方面不具有生物等效性。在本研究中,两种制剂均安全且耐受性良好。所有不良事件(AE)一般较轻,主要与胃肠道或神经系统相关(如头晕、头痛)。未报告心电图检查结果为不良事件,也未报告严重不良事件或死亡。

结论

单次口服400毫克阿巴康唑片剂后的AUC和C(max)低于胶囊制剂。因此,阿巴康唑片剂和胶囊不能被认为具有生物等效性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84b0/3564460/1ec3330f7ffd/cpaa-5-023Fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验