Socha W, Rola J
Department of Virology, National Veterinary Research Institute, Al. Partyzantów 57, 24-100 Puławy, Poland.
Pol J Vet Sci. 2012;15(4):629-34. doi: 10.2478/v10181-012-0099-y.
Three different rapid strip tests: TRU RSV, BinaxNOW RSV and RSV Respi-strip were compared with RT-PCR and ELISA BRSV Ag for the ability to detect bovine respiratory syncytial virus (BRSV) in nasal swabs collected from calves experimentally vaccinated with live vaccine Rispoval RS-PI3. The reference strains of BRSV (375 and A51908) were detected by ELISA BRSV Ag whereas the strains of human respiratory syncytial virus (HRSV) and bovine parainfluenza virus type 3 (BPIV-3) were not. All rapid strip tests as well as RT-PCR reacted positively both to HRSV and BRSV reference strains and negatively to BPIV-3. The detection limit for RT-PCR was 39.1 TCID50 (strain 375 of BRSV), whereas for each of the rapid tests it was approximately 156 TCID50 and 312 TCID50 for antigen ELISA. Diagnostic sensitivity in detecting BRSV in nasal swabs for TRU RSV and RSV Respi-strip tests was 33% and 50% for BinaxNOW RSV. Diagnostic specificity of TRU RSV was 100%, whereas for both BinaxNOW and Respi-strip it was 87%. We concluded that TRU RSV could be used as a supportive rapid test for BRSV screening in nasal swabs taken directly on a farm. However, due to the small group of animals used in the experiment, the results should be regarded as preliminary and the study should be repeated on a larger number of animals.
TRU RSV、BinaxNOW RSV和RSV Respi-strip,与RT-PCR和ELISA BRSV Ag进行了比较,以检测从用活疫苗Rispoval RS-PI3进行实验性接种的犊牛采集的鼻拭子中牛呼吸道合胞病毒(BRSV)的能力。ELISA BRSV Ag检测到了BRSV的参考毒株(375和A51908),而人呼吸道合胞病毒(HRSV)和牛副流感病毒3型(BPIV-3)毒株未被检测到。所有快速试纸检测方法以及RT-PCR对HRSV和BRSV参考毒株均呈阳性反应,对BPIV-3呈阴性反应。RT-PCR的检测限为39.1 TCID50(BRSV毒株375),而每种快速检测方法的检测限约为156 TCID50,抗原ELISA的检测限为312 TCID50。TRU RSV和RSV Respi-strip检测鼻拭子中BRSV的诊断敏感性分别为33%和50%,BinaxNOW RSV为50%。TRU RSV的诊断特异性为100%,而BinaxNOW和Respi-strip的诊断特异性均为87%。我们得出结论,TRU RSV可作为在农场直接采集的鼻拭子中进行BRSV筛查的辅助快速检测方法。然而,由于实验中使用的动物数量较少,结果应视为初步结果,该研究应在更多动物上重复进行。