• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

团队干预对社区护士生活方式风险因素管理实践的影响:社区护理 SNAP 试验的结果。

The impact of a team-based intervention on the lifestyle risk factor management practices of community nurses: outcomes of the community nursing SNAP trial.

机构信息

Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Feb 9;13:54. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-54.

DOI:10.1186/1472-6963-13-54
PMID:23394573
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3599701/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lifestyle risk factors like smoking, nutrition, alcohol consumption, and physical inactivity (SNAP) are the main behavioural risk factors for chronic disease. Primary health care is an appropriate setting to address these risk factors in individuals. Generalist community health nurses (GCHNs) are uniquely placed to provide lifestyle interventions as they see clients in their homes over a period of time. The aim of the paper is to examine the impact of a service-level intervention on the risk factor management practices of GCHNs.

METHODS

The trial used a quasi-experimental design involving four generalist community nursing services in NSW, Australia. The services were randomly allocated to either an intervention group or control group. Nurses in the intervention group were provided with training and support in the provision of brief lifestyle assessments and interventions. The control group provided usual care. A sample of 129 GCHNs completed surveys at baseline, 6 and 12 months to examine changes in their practices and levels of confidence related to the management of SNAP risk factors. Six semi-structured interviews and four focus groups were conducted among the intervention group to explore the feasibility of incorporating the intervention into everyday practice.

RESULTS

Nurses in the intervention group became more confident in assessment and intervention over the three time points compared to their control group peers. Nurses in the intervention group reported assessing physical activity, weight and nutrition more frequently, as well as providing more brief interventions for physical activity, weight management and smoking cessation. There was little change in referral rates except for an improvement in weight management related referrals. Nurses' perception of the importance of 'client and system-related' barriers to risk factor management diminished over time.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that the intervention was associated with positive changes in self-reported lifestyle risk factor management practices of GCHNs. Barriers to referral remained. The service model needs to be adapted to sustain these changes and enhance referral.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ACTRN12609001081202.

摘要

背景

生活方式风险因素,如吸烟、营养、饮酒和缺乏身体活动(SNAP),是慢性病的主要行为风险因素。初级卫生保健是在个人层面解决这些风险因素的适当场所。全科社区保健护士(GCHN)由于在一段时间内能够在患者家中看到患者,因此能够提供生活方式干预,处于独特的位置。为了检验服务层面干预对 GCHN 管理风险因素做法的影响,本文旨在研究这一干预措施。

方法

该试验采用准实验设计,涉及澳大利亚新南威尔士州的四个全科社区护理服务。这些服务被随机分配到干预组或对照组。干预组的护士接受了提供简短生活方式评估和干预的培训和支持。对照组提供常规护理。129 名全科社区保健护士完成了基线、6 个月和 12 个月的调查,以检查他们在管理 SNAP 风险因素方面的做法和信心水平的变化。对干预组的六名半结构化访谈和四名焦点小组进行了访谈,以探讨将干预措施纳入日常实践的可行性。

结果

与对照组相比,干预组的护士在三个时间点对评估和干预的信心都有所增强。干预组的护士报告称,更频繁地评估身体活动、体重和营养状况,并更频繁地提供身体活动、体重管理和戒烟方面的简短干预。除了体重管理相关转诊的改善外,转诊率几乎没有变化。护士对管理风险因素的“患者和系统相关”障碍的重要性的看法随着时间的推移而减弱。

结论

本研究表明,该干预措施与 GCHN 自我报告的生活方式风险因素管理做法的积极变化相关。转诊障碍仍然存在。需要调整服务模式,以维持这些变化并加强转诊。

试验注册

ACTRN12609001081202。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31b3/3599701/db31e41ee4e3/1472-6963-13-54-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31b3/3599701/db31e41ee4e3/1472-6963-13-54-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31b3/3599701/db31e41ee4e3/1472-6963-13-54-1.jpg

相似文献

1
The impact of a team-based intervention on the lifestyle risk factor management practices of community nurses: outcomes of the community nursing SNAP trial.团队干预对社区护士生活方式风险因素管理实践的影响:社区护理 SNAP 试验的结果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Feb 9;13:54. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-54.
2
An efficacy trial of brief lifestyle intervention delivered by generalist community nurses (CN SNAP trial).由全科社区护士实施的简短生活方式干预的疗效试验(CN SNAP 试验)。
BMC Nurs. 2010 Feb 23;9:4. doi: 10.1186/1472-6955-9-4.
3
The impact of a brief lifestyle intervention delivered by generalist community nurses (CN SNAP trial).通科社区护士进行的简短生活方式干预的影响(CN SNAP试验)
BMC Public Health. 2013 Apr 22;13:375. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-375.
4
Evaluating the effectiveness of a healthy lifestyle clinician in addressing the chronic disease risk behaviours of community mental health clients: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.评估健康生活方式临床医生对社区心理健康服务对象慢性病风险行为的干预效果:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Jun 15;18(1):276. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2017-1.
5
Is there scope for community health nurses to address lifestyle risk factors? the community nursing SNAP trial.社区卫生护士是否有机会解决生活方式风险因素?社区护理 SNAP 试验。
BMC Nurs. 2012 Mar 15;11:4. doi: 10.1186/1472-6955-11-4.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
An intervention to improve the quality of life in children of parents with serious mental illness: the Young SMILES feasibility RCT.改善严重精神疾病父母子女生活质量的干预措施:Young SMILES 可行性 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Nov;24(59):1-136. doi: 10.3310/hta24590.
8
Practice nurse-supported weight self-management delivered within the national child immunisation programme for postnatal women: a feasibility cluster RCT.在国家儿童免疫计划内,由执业护士提供支持的产后妇女体重自我管理:一项可行性整群 RCT 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Aug;25(49):1-130. doi: 10.3310/hta25490.
9
The effectiveness of an intervention in increasing community health clinician provision of preventive care: a study protocol of a non-randomised, multiple-baseline trial.干预措施在增加社区卫生临床医生提供预防保健方面的效果:一项非随机、多基线试验的研究方案。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Dec 30;11:354. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-354.
10
Increasing the provision of preventive care by community healthcare services: a stepped wedge implementation trial.提高社区医疗服务提供预防保健的措施:一个逐步楔形实施试验。
Implement Sci. 2017 Aug 22;12(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0636-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Primary Healthcare Providers' Activities in Linking Patients With Chronic Diseases to Community Organizations: A Scoping Review.初级保健提供者将慢性病患者与社区组织联系起来的活动:范围综述。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2024 Jan-Dec;15:21501319241257374. doi: 10.1177/21501319241257374.
2
Evaluation of the B.strong Queensland Indigenous Health Worker Brief Intervention Training Program for Multiple Health Risk Behaviours.对昆士兰原住民健康工作者针对多种健康风险行为的简短干预培训计划的评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 16;18(8):4220. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18084220.
3
Feasibility of face-to-face and online learning methods to provide nutrition education to midwives, general practice nurses and student nurses.

本文引用的文献

1
What predicts patient-reported GP management of smoking, nutrition, alcohol, physical activity and weight?哪些因素能够预测患者报告的全科医生对吸烟、营养、饮酒、体育活动和体重的管理情况?
Aust J Prim Health. 2012;18(2):123-8. doi: 10.1071/PY11024.
2
Is there scope for community health nurses to address lifestyle risk factors? the community nursing SNAP trial.社区卫生护士是否有机会解决生活方式风险因素?社区护理 SNAP 试验。
BMC Nurs. 2012 Mar 15;11:4. doi: 10.1186/1472-6955-11-4.
3
A two-year randomized trial of obesity treatment in primary care practice.
面对面和在线学习方法对助产士、全科护士和实习护士进行营养教育的可行性。
BMJ Nutr Prev Health. 2019 Sep 3;2(2):80-85. doi: 10.1136/bmjnph-2019-000031. eCollection 2019.
4
Optimisation of a metabotype approach to deliver targeted dietary advice.优化代谢型方法以提供针对性的饮食建议。
Nutr Metab (Lond). 2020 Sep 29;17:82. doi: 10.1186/s12986-020-00499-z. eCollection 2020.
5
A systematic review of approaches to improve practice, detection and treatment of unhealthy alcohol use in primary health care: a role for continuous quality improvement.改善初级卫生保健中不健康饮酒的实践、检测和治疗方法的系统评价:持续质量改进的作用。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Feb 13;21(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-1101-x.
6
Supporting workforce practice change: protocol for a pilot study of a motivational interviewing virtual client software tool for health professionals.支持劳动力实践变革:一项健康专业人员使用动机式访谈虚拟客户软件工具的试点研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 9;10(2):e033080. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033080.
7
What predicts regression from pre-diabetes to normal glucose regulation following a primary care nurse-delivered dietary intervention? A study protocol for a prospective cohort study.什么因素可预测经初级保健护士实施饮食干预后,前驱糖尿病向正常血糖调节的逆转?一项前瞻性队列研究的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 9;9(12):e033358. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033358.
8
Increasing the provision of preventive care by community healthcare services: a stepped wedge implementation trial.提高社区医疗服务提供预防保健的措施:一个逐步楔形实施试验。
Implement Sci. 2017 Aug 22;12(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0636-2.
9
Systematic review of interventions to increase the delivery of preventive care by primary care nurses and allied health clinicians.关于增加初级护理护士和专职医疗临床医生提供预防性护理措施的系统评价。
Implement Sci. 2016 Apr 6;11:50. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0409-3.
一项在初级保健实践中进行的为期两年的肥胖治疗随机试验。
N Engl J Med. 2011 Nov 24;365(21):1969-79. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1109220. Epub 2011 Nov 14.
4
An efficacy trial of brief lifestyle intervention delivered by generalist community nurses (CN SNAP trial).由全科社区护士实施的简短生活方式干预的疗效试验(CN SNAP 试验)。
BMC Nurs. 2010 Feb 23;9:4. doi: 10.1186/1472-6955-9-4.
5
An exploration of how clinician attitudes and beliefs influence the implementation of lifestyle risk factor management in primary healthcare: a grounded theory study.探讨临床医生的态度和信念如何影响初级保健中生活方式风险因素管理的实施:扎根理论研究。
Implement Sci. 2009 Oct 13;4:66. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-66.
6
Exercise on prescription for women aged 40-74 recruited through primary care: two year randomised controlled trial.针对通过初级医疗保健招募的40至74岁女性的处方运动:两年随机对照试验。
BMJ. 2008 Dec 11;337:a2509. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a2509.
7
Cancer prevention in primary care: predictors of patient counseling across four risk behaviors over 24 months.初级保健中的癌症预防:24个月内四种风险行为患者咨询的预测因素。
Prev Med. 2008 Mar;46(3):252-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.11.020. Epub 2007 Dec 23.
8
Is patient satisfaction sensitive to changes in the quality of care? An exploitation of the Hawthorne effect.患者满意度对医疗质量的变化敏感吗?对霍桑效应的一种探讨。
J Health Econ. 2008 Mar;27(2):444-59. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2007.07.004. Epub 2007 Nov 29.
9
Effectiveness of brief alcohol interventions in primary care populations.简短酒精干预对基层医疗人群的有效性。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Apr 18(2):CD004148. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004148.pub3.
10
Are physicians asking about tobacco use and assisting with cessation? Results from the 2001-2004 national ambulatory medical care survey (NAMCS).医生们是否询问患者的烟草使用情况并协助其戒烟?2001 - 2004年国家门诊医疗调查(NAMCS)的结果。
Prev Med. 2006 Dec;43(6):472-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2006.07.009. Epub 2006 Aug 21.