Baldwin Keith D, Scherl Susan A
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Instr Course Lect. 2013;62:399-403.
Child abuse is one of the most serious problems encountered by on-call orthopaedic surgeons. There are adverse sequelae to both overdiagnosing and underdiagnosing this condition. Orthopaedic surgeons generally manage orthopaedic aspects of child abuse but should be aware of the associated injuries, diagnoses, prognoses, and natural history of abuse. Because fractures are the second most common presenting injury in children after skin lesions, orthopaedic surgeons are often on the front lines of treatment. No specific fracture is pathognomonic of child abuse, although some patterns, such as posterior rib fractures, metaphyseal corner fractures, and fractures in various stages of healing, are highly suggestive of abuse. Although metabolic bone disease is much rarer than child abuse, the child should be tested so treatment can be initiated, if needed, or for the purpose of demonstrating due diligence in the event of court proceedings. A diagnosis of child abuse is an understandably contentious issue; therefore, orthopaedic surgeons should be aware of injury patterns and differential diagnoses.
虐待儿童是值班骨科医生所面临的最严重问题之一。对这种情况的过度诊断和诊断不足都会产生不良后果。骨科医生通常处理虐待儿童的骨科问题,但应了解相关损伤、诊断、预后及虐待的自然病程。由于骨折是儿童继皮肤损伤后第二常见的就诊损伤,骨科医生常常处于治疗的第一线。虽然没有哪种特定骨折是虐待儿童的特征性表现,但某些骨折类型,如肋骨后段骨折、干骺端角部骨折以及处于不同愈合阶段的骨折,高度提示存在虐待行为。尽管代谢性骨病比虐待儿童罕见得多,但仍应对儿童进行检测,以便在必要时启动治疗,或者在法庭诉讼时证明已尽到应有的谨慎。虐待儿童的诊断是一个容易引起争议的问题;因此,骨科医生应了解损伤类型和鉴别诊断。