Jang Woo Sung, Kim Woong-Han, Choi Kwangho, Lee Jeong Ryul, Kim Yong Jin, Kwon Bo Sang, Kim Gi Beom
Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Children's Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 110-744, South Korea.
Pediatr Cardiol. 2013 Aug;34(6):1366-73. doi: 10.1007/s00246-013-0650-3. Epub 2013 Feb 9.
Although significant atrioventricular valve regurgitation (AVVR) is well known for its association with increased morbidity and mortality in patients with single-ventricle physiology, there is a lack of consensus in management of AVVR. The purpose of this study was to analyze the clinical outcomes in patients receiving AVV repair or replacement. From 2001 to 2010, a total of 33 patients (25 male and 8 female) with more than moderate-degree AVVR among 160 patients who underwent staged single-ventricle palliation were included. The median follow-up duration was 6.0 years (range 0.1-14.1). Valve repair (n = 27) or valve replacement (n = 6) was performed at the initial surgery. There were six late mortalities (18.18 %): five in the repair group and one in the replacement group and seven morbidities. Among patients with valve repair, 11 were required to undergo redo-valve operations (valve repair n = 6, valve replacement n = 5) due to deteriorated valve function. Initial shunt procedure (p = 0.04) and arrhythmia (p = 0.01) were risk factors for survival. Freedom from reoperation in the valve replacement group was higher than that in the valve repair group (67.0 ± 9.7 and 44.6 ± 11.2 % at 5 and 6 years, respectively, p = 0.03). Need for early repair (p = 0.02), presence of mitral- or tricuspid-dominant AVV (p = 0.005), and male sex (p = 0.04) were risk factors for valve durability. Early valve regurgitation affects valve durability. Thus, successful repair in the early stage may improve later outcomes. Therefore, aggressive valve surgery was required and AVV replacement might be one of the options for selected patients.
虽然重度房室瓣反流(AVVR)与单心室生理患者的发病率和死亡率增加密切相关,但在AVVR的管理方面缺乏共识。本研究的目的是分析接受房室瓣修复或置换患者的临床结局。2001年至2010年,在160例行分期单心室姑息治疗的患者中,共有33例(25例男性和8例女性)存在中度以上AVVR。中位随访时间为6.0年(范围0.1 - 14.1年)。初次手术时进行了瓣膜修复(n = 27)或瓣膜置换(n = 6)。有6例晚期死亡(18.18%):修复组5例,置换组1例,还有7例发病。在瓣膜修复的患者中,11例因瓣膜功能恶化需要再次进行瓣膜手术(瓣膜修复n = 6,瓣膜置换n = 5)。初始分流手术(p = 0.04)和心律失常(p = 0.01)是生存的危险因素。瓣膜置换组再次手术的自由度高于瓣膜修复组(5年和6年时分别为67.0 ± 9.7%和44.6 ± 11.2%,p = 0.03)。早期修复的必要性(p = 0.02)、二尖瓣或三尖瓣为主的房室瓣的存在(p = 0.005)以及男性性别(p = 0.04)是瓣膜耐久性的危险因素。早期瓣膜反流影响瓣膜耐久性。因此,早期成功修复可能改善后期结局。所以,需要积极的瓣膜手术,房室瓣置换可能是部分患者的选择之一。