Suppr超能文献

比较 Abbott RealTime 高危型 HPV 与 Genomica HPV 临床检测试剂盒在 HPV DNA 检测中的应用。

Comparison of the Abbott RealTime High Risk HPV with Genomica HPV Clinical Array for the detection of human papillomavirus DNA.

机构信息

Laboratory of Virology.

出版信息

APMIS. 2013 Nov;121(11):1054-63. doi: 10.1111/apm.12054. Epub 2013 Feb 11.

Abstract

Human papillomavirus (HPV) has been identified as the major cause of cervical cancer worldwide and HPV DNA testing is recommended in primary cervical cancer screening. Several molecular tests for detection/typing of HPV DNA with different sensitivity and specificity are commercially available. The present study compared the performance of the Abbott RealTime High Risk HPV assay and the Genomica HPV Clinical Array CLART2 in 78 specimens (63 cervical smears and 15 rectal/urethral swabs).The typing results of the Genomica assay were in absolute agreement with each of the four possible result categories of the Abbott assay (HPV16, HPV18, Other HR HPV, not detected) in 87.2% (68/78) of the samples, with a Cohen' kappa agreement coefficient for every HR type of 0.62 (95% CI: 0.39-0.85), higher in cervical swabs (k = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.50-0.99) than in rectal/urethral swabs (k = 0.36, 95% CI: 0.00-0.82). There was an excellent agreement of the Genomica results with those of Abbott in cervical samples harbored HPV single infection (100% agreement). Nonetheless, both methods may lose sensitivity for detecting HPV types in multiple infections, giving discordant results (10/78). This underlines the importance of establishing the analytical sensitivity in HPV type detection in single and multiple HPV infections. In rectal/urethral swabs, 5 of 15 (33%) discordant cases were observed, most of which became compatible when the Genomica assay was performed starting from nucleic acid extracted with the Abbott m2000sp system. These results suggest that nucleic extraction based on the magnetic beads technique is suitable for HPV DNA detection in urethral/rectal swabs.

摘要

人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)已被确定为全球宫颈癌的主要病因,HPV DNA 检测被推荐用于宫颈癌的初级筛查。目前已有多种用于 HPV DNA 检测/分型的分子检测方法,这些方法在灵敏度和特异性方面存在差异,均已实现商业化。本研究比较了 Abbott RealTime 高危型 HPV 检测和 Genomica HPV 临床微阵列 CLART2 在 78 例标本(63 例宫颈涂片和 15 例直肠/尿道拭子)中的性能。Genomica 检测的分型结果与 Abbott 检测的 4 种可能结果类别(HPV16、HPV18、其他高危型 HPV、未检出)完全一致,在 87.2%(68/78)的样本中,每一种高危型 HPV 的 Cohen'kappa 一致性系数为 0.62(95%CI:0.39-0.85),在宫颈拭子中更高(k=0.74,95%CI:0.50-0.99),而在直肠/尿道拭子中更低(k=0.36,95%CI:0.00-0.82)。在 HPV 单一感染的宫颈样本中,Genomica 与 Abbott 的检测结果具有极好的一致性(100%一致)。然而,两种方法在检测多重感染中的 HPV 类型时可能会降低灵敏度,导致结果不一致(10/78)。这突显了在 HPV 单一和多重感染中建立 HPV 类型检测分析灵敏度的重要性。在直肠/尿道拭子中,观察到 15 例中有 5 例(33%)不一致,其中大部分在使用 Abbott m2000sp 系统提取的核酸进行 Genomica 检测时变得一致。这些结果表明,基于磁珠技术的核酸提取适用于尿道/直肠拭子中的 HPV DNA 检测。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验