Cognosco, Anexa Animal Health, Morrinsville, New Zealand.
Theriogenology. 2013 Mar 15;79(5):882-9. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2012.12.013. Epub 2013 Feb 8.
The objective was to evaluate the efficacy and economic benefits of three synchrony programs in 1137 heifers from 10 pasture-based dairy herds. Heifers were randomly assigned to one of three treatments within each herd on Day -13 (Day 0 = start of the breeding program). They were treated with: (1) PGF(2α) on Days -13 and -2, with AI after detection of estrus between Days 0 and 3 (Double PG); (2) GnRH, PGF(2α), and GnRH on Days -9, -2, and 0, respectively, with placement of an intravaginal progesterone (P4)-releasing device between Days -9 and -2, and set time AI on Day 1 (GPG + P4); or (3) same as the GPG + P4 group but with the set time AI on Day 0 (Cosynch + P4). Plasma P4 concentrations were determined on Days -20 and -13 to determine pubertal status. The Cosynch + P4 treatment had a higher (P < 0.05) conception rate to AI (57% vs. 47% vs. 48% for Cosynch + P4, GPG + P4, and Double PG, respectively), 21-day in-calf rate (76% vs. 72% vs. 63% for Cosynch + P4, GPG + P4, and Double PG), and a shorter median interval from the start of the breeding program to conception (0, 14, and 19 days for Cosynch + P4, GPG + P4, and Double PG). Heifers that had reached puberty before breeding, compared with those that had not, had higher (P < 0.05) in-calf rates to AI (53% vs. 47%) at 21 days (74% vs. 64%) and at 42 days (91% vs. 84%). Pubertal status was associated with herd, breed, age, and body condition score at the start of mating (P < 0.05). A partial budget model demonstrated that, compared with the Double PG program, there was an economic benefit from the Cosynch + P4 (mean, NZ$25.73; 95% confidence interval, 2.99-50.69), but not the GPG + P4 program (mean, NZ$-0.65; 95% confidence interval, -21.87 to 21.58). We concluded that the Cosynch + P4 program resulted in the highest fertility and economic benefit of the three programs evaluated, and that reproductive response was affected by pubertal status.
该研究旨在评估在 10 个牧场奶牛场的 1137 头小母牛中,三种同步方案的疗效和经济效益。小母牛在每个牧场的第-13 天(第 0 天=繁殖计划开始)被随机分配到三种处理方案中的一种。他们接受了以下处理:(1)PGF(2α)在第-13 天和第-2 天,发情检测后在第 0 天至第 3 天之间进行人工授精(双重 PG);(2)分别在第-9、-2 和 0 天使用 GnRH、PGF(2α)和 GnRH,在第-9 天至第-2 天之间放置阴道内孕酮(P4)释放装置,并在第 1 天(GPG + P4)设置定时人工授精;(3)与 GPG + P4 组相同,但设置定时人工授精在第 0 天(Cosynch + P4)。在第-20 天和第-13 天测定血浆 P4 浓度以确定青春期状态。Cosynch + P4 处理的受孕率(AI)更高(P <0.05)(57%比 47%比 48%,Cosynch + P4、GPG + P4 和双重 PG),21 天妊娠率(76%比 72%比 63%,Cosynch + P4、GPG + P4 和双重 PG),从繁殖计划开始到受孕的中位数间隔更短(0、14 和 19 天,Cosynch + P4、GPG + P4 和双重 PG)。与未发情的小母牛相比,发情的小母牛发情率更高(AI:53%比 47%;21 天:74%比 64%;42 天:91%比 84%)。青春期状态与牧场、品种、年龄和配种开始时的身体状况评分有关(P <0.05)。部分预算模型表明,与双重 PG 方案相比,Cosynch + P4 方案具有经济效益(均值,新西兰元 25.73;95%置信区间,2.99-50.69),而 GPG + P4 方案则没有经济效益(均值,新西兰元-0.65;95%置信区间,-21.87 至 21.58)。我们得出的结论是,Cosynch + P4 方案是三种方案中最具生育力和经济效益的方案,而生殖反应受青春期状态的影响。