• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两步算法用于艰难梭菌:谷氨酸脱氢酶阳性、毒素阴性的酶免疫检测结果可能需要进一步检测。

Two-stage algorithm for Clostridium difficile: glutamate-dehydrogenase-positive toxin-negative enzyme immunoassay results may require further testing.

机构信息

Department of Microbiology, Sunderland Royal Hospital, Sunderland, UK.

出版信息

J Hosp Infect. 2013 Apr;83(4):347-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2012.12.012. Epub 2013 Feb 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.jhin.2012.12.012
PMID:23399483
Abstract

This study investigated 102 episodes in which a glutamate dehydrogenase-positive enzyme immunoassay (EIA)-toxin-negative result was obtained with a C. difficile testing protocol. Of these 102 stool samples, 46% were culture positive with a toxigenic strain and nine were followed by an EIA-toxin-positive result within 2-32 days. The data accord with our policy of keeping these patients in side-rooms until asymptomatic and of encouraging treatment of those with otherwise unexplained persistent diarrhoea. Adding a third testing modality [toxigenic culture or polymerase chain reaction (PCR)] appears desirable but there may be significant differences in sensitivity between different toxigenic culture or PCR methods.

摘要

本研究调查了 102 例按照艰难梭菌检测方案进行谷氨酸脱氢酶阳性酶免疫测定(EIA)-毒素阴性检测的结果。在这 102 份粪便样本中,46%的样本培养出产毒菌株阳性,其中 9 份在 2-32 天内出现 EIA-毒素阳性结果。这些数据符合我们的政策,即让这些患者住在隔离病房,直到无症状,并鼓励对那些有其他不明原因持续腹泻的患者进行治疗。添加第三种检测方法[产毒培养或聚合酶链反应(PCR)]似乎是可取的,但不同的产毒培养或 PCR 方法之间的敏感性可能存在显著差异。

相似文献

1
Two-stage algorithm for Clostridium difficile: glutamate-dehydrogenase-positive toxin-negative enzyme immunoassay results may require further testing.两步算法用于艰难梭菌:谷氨酸脱氢酶阳性、毒素阴性的酶免疫检测结果可能需要进一步检测。
J Hosp Infect. 2013 Apr;83(4):347-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2012.12.012. Epub 2013 Feb 8.
2
Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated disease: examination of multiple algorithms using toxin EIA, glutamate dehydrogenase EIA and loop-mediated isothermal amplification.艰难梭菌相关性疾病的诊断:使用毒素酶免疫测定、谷氨酸脱氢酶酶免疫测定和环介导等温扩增对多种算法进行检测
Br J Biomed Sci. 2012;69(3):112-8.
3
Two-step glutamate dehydrogenase antigen real-time polymerase chain reaction assay for detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile.两步谷氨酸脱氢酶抗原实时聚合酶链反应检测产毒艰难梭菌。
J Hosp Infect. 2010 Jan;74(1):48-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2009.08.014. Epub 2009 Nov 8.
4
Clinical relevance of a positive molecular test in the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.分子检测阳性对艰难梭菌感染诊断的临床意义。
J Hosp Infect. 2013 Aug;84(4):311-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2013.05.006. Epub 2013 Jul 5.
5
Comparison of enzyme immunoassays and rapid diagnostic tests for clostridium difficile glutamate dehydrogenase and toxin a + B to toxinogenic culture on a highly selective chromogenic medium.在高选择性显色培养基上,将艰难梭菌谷氨酸脱氢酶及毒素A+B的酶免疫测定法和快速诊断测试与产毒培养法进行比较。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016 Oct;35(10):1655-9. doi: 10.1007/s10096-016-2706-9. Epub 2016 Jun 21.
6
Comparison of eight commercial enzyme immunoassays for the detection of Clostridium difficile from stool samples and effect of strain type.比较 8 种商业酶免疫分析方法检测粪便样本中产毒艰难梭菌的效果及菌株类型的影响。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012 May;73(1):94-6. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2012.01.005. Epub 2012 Mar 15.
7
Detection of antigen and toxin in stool specimens: Comparison of the quik chek complete enzyme immunoassay and GeneXpert polymerase chain reaction assay.粪便标本中抗原和毒素的检测:快速检测全酶免疫测定法与GeneXpert聚合酶链反应测定法的比较
Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2017 Jul-Aug;23(4):259-262. doi: 10.4103/sjg.SJG_80_17.
8
Yield of stool culture with isolate toxin testing versus a two-step algorithm including stool toxin testing for detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile.粪便培养结合分离毒素检测与包括粪便毒素检测在内的两步算法在检测产毒素艰难梭菌方面的检出率。
J Clin Microbiol. 2007 Nov;45(11):3601-5. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01305-07. Epub 2007 Sep 5.
9
Comparison between the two-step and the three-step algorithms for the detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile.用于检测产毒艰难梭菌的两步法和三步法算法之间的比较。
Indian J Med Microbiol. 2011 Jul-Sep;29(3):293-6. doi: 10.4103/0255-0857.83916.
10
A two-stage algorithm for Clostridium difficile including PCR: can we replace the toxin EIA?一种包含 PCR 的艰难梭菌两步式算法:我们能否替代毒素 EIA?
J Hosp Infect. 2012 Jan;80(1):82-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2011.09.012. Epub 2011 Nov 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnosis of infection and impact of testing.感染的诊断与检测的影响
J Med Microbiol. 2024 Dec;73(12). doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.001939.
2
Clinical outcomes and treatment necessity in patients with toxin-negative Clostridioides difficile stool samples.无毒素艰难梭菌粪便样本患者的临床结局和治疗必要性。
Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2024 Apr 25;23(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12941-024-00696-1.