Neubauer J C
U.S. School of Aerospace Medicine, Brooks AFB, TX 78235.
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1990 Apr;61(4):343-8.
In the past, bird strikes have been analyzed in an effort to reduce costs by reducing strikes. No one has evaluated bird strike data from the perspective of injury prevention and the cost in human lives. This is a cross-sectional analysis of 22,423 bird strikes reported in the U.S. Air Force in 1974-88. Summary statistics revealed patterns previously reported by others. Relative risk analysis of fatal and injurious bird strikes revealed several statistically significant associations. Fatal or injurious outcomes were associated with strikes in the F-4 and B-1. In addition, windshield penetration was likely to cause death or injury. Flying on a bombing range or flying at speeds greater than 556 km/h (300 knots indicated airspeed) were also more likely to lead to a serious outcome. This analysis can be used as an adjunct to previous analytical methods and, I hope, can provide insight into more focused strategies for saving both lives and aircraft.
过去,人们对鸟类撞击事件进行了分析,试图通过减少撞击来降低成本。但还没有人从预防伤害和人员生命代价的角度评估鸟类撞击数据。这是一项对1974年至1988年美国空军报告的22423起鸟类撞击事件的横断面分析。汇总统计数据揭示了其他人之前报告过的模式。对致命和致伤鸟类撞击事件的相对风险分析揭示了几个具有统计学意义的关联。致命或致伤结果与F - 4和B - 1型飞机的撞击有关。此外,挡风玻璃被穿透很可能导致死亡或受伤。在轰炸靶场飞行或以超过556公里/小时(指示空速300节)的速度飞行也更有可能导致严重后果。该分析可作为先前分析方法的辅助手段,我希望它能为更有针对性的拯救生命和飞机的策略提供见解。