• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于调查、分析和预防人为失误飞机事故的3W方法。

3W approach to the investigation, analysis, and prevention of human-error aircraft accidents.

作者信息

Ricketson D S, Brown W R, Graham K N

出版信息

Aviat Space Environ Med. 1980 Sep;51(9 Pt 2):1036-42.

PMID:7417175
Abstract

Human error is the largest cause of U.S. Army aircraft accidents. An approach to this problem is presented which is based on a model of the human-error accident. This 3W approach identifies what task error (TE) caused or contributed to the accident, what inadequacy (I) in the aviation system caused or allowed the TE to occur, and what remedial measure (R) is required to correct the I. There were 82 human-error accidents analyzed to identify TEIR information. Statistically important is were identified which could be remedied based on accident costs. Then, potentially cost-effective remedial actions were ranked on a cost-benefit totem pole. The totem pole was given to the aviation system manager as a management tool to assist in determining priorities for corrective actions.

摘要

人为失误是美国陆军飞机事故的最大原因。本文提出了一种基于人为失误事故模型的解决该问题的方法。这种3W方法确定了导致事故或促成事故的任务失误(TE)、航空系统中导致或允许任务失误发生的不足之处(I)以及纠正不足之处所需的补救措施(R)。对82起人为失误事故进行了分析,以确定TEIR信息。确定了具有统计学意义且可根据事故成本进行补救的因素。然后,根据成本效益对潜在的具有成本效益的补救行动进行排序。这个排序结果作为管理工具提供给航空系统经理,以协助确定纠正行动的优先级。

相似文献

1
3W approach to the investigation, analysis, and prevention of human-error aircraft accidents.用于调查、分析和预防人为失误飞机事故的3W方法。
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1980 Sep;51(9 Pt 2):1036-42.
2
Human performance breakdowns are rarely accidents: they are usually very poor choices with disastrous results.人类的行为失误很少是意外:它们通常是非常糟糕的选择,会带来灾难性的后果。
J Hazard Mater. 2004 Nov 11;115(1-3):155-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2004.05.036.
3
Human factors analysis and classification system applied to civil aircraft accidents in India.应用于印度民航事故的人为因素分析与分类系统。
Aviat Space Environ Med. 2005 May;76(5):501-5.
4
The accident/injury matrix: a tool for aircraft accident investigation.事故/伤害矩阵:一种用于飞机事故调查的工具。
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1980 Oct;51(10):1147-9.
5
Human error analysis of commercial aviation accidents: application of the Human Factors Analysis and Classification system (HFACS).商业航空事故的人为错误分析:人为因素分析与分类系统(HFACS)的应用。
Aviat Space Environ Med. 2001 Nov;72(11):1006-16.
6
Human factors in remotely piloted aircraft operations: HFACS analysis of 221 mishaps over 10 years.遥控飞机操作中的人为因素:对10年间221起事故的HFACS分析
Aviat Space Environ Med. 2006 Jul;77(7):724-32.
7
The value of experienced medical personnel during the investigation of general aviation accidents.
Aviat Space Environ Med. 2002 Sep;73(9):881-5.
8
Human factors in aircraft incidents: results of a 7-year study.飞机事故中的人为因素:一项为期7年的研究结果
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1984 Oct;55(10):960-5.
9
Human factors in air force aircraft accidents.空军飞机事故中的人为因素。
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1975 Mar;46(3):316-8.
10
Pilot error in air carrier accidents: does age matter?航空承运人事故中的飞行员失误:年龄有影响吗?
Aviat Space Environ Med. 2006 Jul;77(7):737-41.

引用本文的文献

1
Research into medical accidents: a case of negligence?医疗事故调查:是疏忽所致?
BMJ. 1989 Nov 4;299(6708):1150-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.299.6708.1150.
2
Obstetric accidents: a review of 64 cases.产科意外:64例病例回顾
BMJ. 1990 May 26;300(6736):1365-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.300.6736.1365.