• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

发展中国家用于宫颈癌及其前体病变筛查的宫颈数字摄影。

Cervical digital photography for screening of uterine cervix cancer and its precursor lesions in developing countries.

机构信息

Faculdade de Medicina, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Medicina: Ciências Médicas, Porto Alegre, Brazil.

出版信息

Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013 Jul;288(1):183-9. doi: 10.1007/s00404-013-2745-8. Epub 2013 Feb 12.

DOI:10.1007/s00404-013-2745-8
PMID:23400355
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aims to evaluate and to compare the performance of cervical digital photography (CDP) to the visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) and visual inspection with Lugol's iodine (VILI) methods for screening the uterine cervix cancer and its precursor lesions in developing countries.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was performed in Brazil. 176 women were evaluated by VIA, VILI, CDP with acetic acid and CDP with Lugol's iodine. Kappa statistic was used to estimate the interobserver and intermethod agreement. Sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of the four methods (VIA, VILI, CDP with acetic acid, CDP with Lugol's iodine) was calculated.

RESULTS

Interobserver agreement for CDP with acetic acid was K = 0.441 and for CDP with Lugol's iodine was K = 0.533; intermethod agreement of VIA and CDP with acetic acid, K = 0.559; and of VILI and CDP with Lugol's iodine, K = 0.507. Sensitivity and specificity of CDP with acetic acid were 84.00 and 95.83 %, and of CDP with Lugol's iodine were 88.00 and 97.26 %, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of CDP with acetic acid and CDP with Lugol's iodine was 92.78 and 94.90 %, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This was the first study to assess the CDP with Lugol's iodine performance, which had similar performance to the CDP with acetic acid. CDP is considered a promising method for screening the uterine cervix cancer and its precursor lesions in developing countries.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估和比较宫颈数字摄影(CDP)与醋酸视觉检查(VIA)和卢戈氏碘液视觉检查(VILI)在发展中国家筛查宫颈癌及其前体病变的性能。

方法

在巴西进行了一项横断面研究。176 名女性接受了 VIA、VILI、醋酸 CDP 和卢戈氏碘液 CDP 检查。采用 Kappa 统计评估观察者间和方法间的一致性。计算了四种方法(VIA、VILI、醋酸 CDP 和卢戈氏碘液 CDP)的敏感性、特异性和诊断准确性。

结果

醋酸 CDP 的观察者间一致性为 K = 0.441,卢戈氏碘液 CDP 的观察者间一致性为 K = 0.533;VIA 和醋酸 CDP 的方法间一致性为 K = 0.559;VILI 和卢戈氏碘液 CDP 的方法间一致性为 K = 0.507。醋酸 CDP 的敏感性和特异性分别为 84.00%和 95.83%,卢戈氏碘液 CDP 的敏感性和特异性分别为 88.00%和 97.26%。醋酸 CDP 和卢戈氏碘液 CDP 的诊断准确性分别为 92.78%和 94.90%。

结论

这是首次评估卢戈氏碘液 CDP 性能的研究,其性能与醋酸 CDP 相似。CDP 被认为是发展中国家筛查宫颈癌及其前体病变的一种很有前途的方法。

相似文献

1
Cervical digital photography for screening of uterine cervix cancer and its precursor lesions in developing countries.发展中国家用于宫颈癌及其前体病变筛查的宫颈数字摄影。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013 Jul;288(1):183-9. doi: 10.1007/s00404-013-2745-8. Epub 2013 Feb 12.
2
Test characteristics of visual inspection with 4% acetic acid (VIA) and Lugol's iodine (VILI) in cervical cancer screening in Kerala, India.印度喀拉拉邦宫颈癌筛查中4%醋酸肉眼观察法(VIA)和卢戈氏碘肉眼观察法(VILI)的检测特征
Int J Cancer. 2003 Sep 1;106(3):404-8. doi: 10.1002/ijc.11245.
3
Evaluation of visual inspection with acetic acid and Lugol's iodine as cervical cancer screening tools in a low-resource setting.在资源匮乏地区,评估醋酸视觉检查和卢戈氏碘液作为宫颈癌筛查工具的效果。
Trop Doct. 2010 Jan;40(1):9-12. doi: 10.1258/td.2009.090085. Epub 2009 Dec 11.
4
Accuracy of combinations of visual inspection using acetic acid or lugol iodine to detect cervical precancer: a meta-analysis.醋酸或卢戈碘目视检查联合用于检测宫颈癌前病变的准确性:一项荟萃分析。
BJOG. 2018 Apr;125(5):545-553. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14783. Epub 2017 Jul 26.
5
Cervical Screening by Pap Test and Visual Inspection Enabling Same-Day Biopsy in Low-Resource, High-Risk Communities.巴氏涂片检查和目视检查进行宫颈筛查,以在资源匮乏、高危社区实现当日活检。
Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Dec;132(6):1421-1429. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002973.
6
Analysis of the effectiveness of visual inspection with acetic acid/Lugol's iodine in one-time and annual follow-up screening in rural China.中国农村地区醋酸/卢戈氏碘液肉眼观察一次性和年度随访筛查效果分析。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012 Jun;285(6):1627-32. doi: 10.1007/s00404-011-2203-4. Epub 2012 Jan 6.
7
A randomized trial comparing the diagnostic accuracy of visual inspection with acetic acid to Visual Inspection with Lugol's Iodine for cervical cancer screening in HIV-infected women.一项比较醋酸目视检查与卢戈氏碘目视检查对感染艾滋病毒女性进行宫颈癌筛查的诊断准确性的随机试验。
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 7;10(4):e0118568. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118568. eCollection 2015.
8
Accuracy of Visual Tests for Primary Cervical Cancer Screening in Rural Nepal.尼泊尔农村地区原发性宫颈癌筛查视觉检测的准确性
JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2018 Nov-Dec;56(214):917-923. doi: 10.31729/jnma.3857.
9
Evaluation of visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA), Lugol's iodine (VILI), cervical cytology and HPV testing as cervical screening tools in Latin America. This report refers to partial results from the LAMS (Latin AMerican Screening) study.评估醋酸目视检查(VIA)、卢戈氏碘液检查(VILI)、宫颈细胞学检查和HPV检测作为拉丁美洲宫颈筛查工具的效果。本报告提及拉丁美洲筛查(LAMS)研究的部分结果。
J Med Screen. 2005;12(3):142-9. doi: 10.1258/0969141054855328.
10
Visual inspection of cervix with Lugol's iodine for early detection of premalignant & malignant lesions of cervix.宫颈卢戈氏碘液染色肉眼观察在宫颈癌及癌前病变筛查中的应用。
Indian J Med Res. 2012 Aug;136(2):265-71.

引用本文的文献

1
Digital cervicography for cervical cancer screening in low-resource settings: A scoping review.资源匮乏地区宫颈癌筛查的数字宫颈摄影术:一项范围综述。
Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2023 Jan 4;45:101130. doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2022.101130. eCollection 2023 Feb.
2
Long Noncoding RNA LINC00467: Role in Various Human Cancers.长链非编码RNA LINC00467:在多种人类癌症中的作用
Front Genet. 2022 Jun 1;13:892009. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.892009. eCollection 2022.
3
A systematic review of handheld tools in lieu of colposcopy for cervical neoplasia and female genital schistosomiasis.
一项关于使用手持工具替代阴道镜检查诊断宫颈肿瘤和女性生殖器血吸虫病的系统评价。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2021 May;153(2):190-199. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13538. Epub 2021 Feb 12.