• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

术前多门控采集扫描在预测择期腹主动脉瘤修复患者长期预后中的作用。

Role of pre-operative multiple gated acquisition scanning in predicting long-term outcome in patients undergoing elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

机构信息

Academic Vascular Surgical Unit, Vascular Laboratory, Hull Royal Infirmary, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Anlaby Road, Hull, HU3 2JZ, UK.

出版信息

World J Surg. 2013 May;37(5):1169-73. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-1939-3.

DOI:10.1007/s00268-013-1939-3
PMID:23400591
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether resting pre-operative left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) estimated by multiple gated acquisition scanning (MUGA) predicts long-term survival in patients undergoing elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair.

METHODS

A retrospective study of MUGA scans which were performed to estimate pre-operative resting LVEF in 127 patients [106 (83 %) males, mean age 74 ± 7.6 years] who underwent elective AAA repair over a period of 4 years from March 2007. We compared outcomes and long-term survival between patients who had a pre-operative LVEF ≤ 40 % (Group 1, n = 60) and LVEF > 40 % (Group 2, n = 67).

RESULTS

Overall 19 (15 %) patients died during the follow-up period (13 patients in group 1 and 6 patients in group 2). 30-day mortality was 8 %. There was no significant difference between group 1 and 2 in terms of patients' mean age or median length of hospital stay (8 days for both groups, p = 0.61). However, group 2 had more females than group 1(18 vs. 3, p = 0.001). Median survival for patients in group 2 was significantly higher than patients in group 1 (1,258 days vs. 1,000 days, p = 0.03). In a Cox regression model which included age, sex, smoking status and LVEF as covariates, only smoking status and LVEF predicted survival [Hazard ratio (HR) = 1.06, p = 0.04 and HR = 0.93, p = 0.00, respectively].

CONCLUSION

This study shows that there is a role for pre-operative MUGA scan assessment of resting LVEF in predicting long-term survival post elective AAA repair and that the lower the pre-operative LVEF the poorer the long-term outcome.

摘要

目的

确定通过门控采集扫描(MUGA)评估的术前左心室射血分数(LVEF)是否可以预测择期腹主动脉瘤(AAA)修复患者的长期生存率。

方法

回顾性分析了在 2007 年 3 月至 4 年内进行的 127 例(106 例男性,平均年龄 74±7.6 岁)择期 AAA 修复患者的 MUGA 扫描,以评估术前静息 LVEF。我们比较了术前 LVEF≤40%(组 1,n=60)和 LVEF>40%(组 2,n=67)患者的结果和长期生存率。

结果

在随访期间,共有 19 例(15%)患者死亡(组 1 中有 13 例,组 2 中有 6 例)。30 天死亡率为 8%。组 1 和组 2 的患者平均年龄或中位住院时间无显著差异(两组均为 8 天,p=0.61)。然而,组 2 的女性多于组 1(18 比 3,p=0.001)。组 2 患者的中位生存时间明显高于组 1(1258 天比 1000 天,p=0.03)。在包括年龄、性别、吸烟状况和 LVEF 作为协变量的 Cox 回归模型中,只有吸烟状况和 LVEF 预测了生存率[风险比(HR)=1.06,p=0.04 和 HR=0.93,p=0.00,分别]。

结论

本研究表明,术前 MUGA 扫描评估静息 LVEF 在预测择期 AAA 修复后的长期生存率方面具有一定作用,术前 LVEF 越低,长期预后越差。

相似文献

1
Role of pre-operative multiple gated acquisition scanning in predicting long-term outcome in patients undergoing elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.术前多门控采集扫描在预测择期腹主动脉瘤修复患者长期预后中的作用。
World J Surg. 2013 May;37(5):1169-73. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-1939-3.
2
Prediction of cardiac risk prior to elective abdominal aortic surgery: role of multiple gated acquisition scan.择期腹主动脉手术前心脏风险的预测:多门控采集扫描的作用。
World J Surg. 2003 Oct;27(10):1085-92. doi: 10.1007/s00268-003-6970-3. Epub 2003 Aug 21.
3
Variation in center-level frailty burden and the impact of frailty on long-term survival in patients undergoing elective repair for abdominal aortic aneurysms.中心层面衰弱负担的变化及其对择期修复腹主动脉瘤患者长期生存的影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Jan;71(1):46-55.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.01.074. Epub 2019 May 27.
4
Editor's Choice - Sex Related Differences in Peri-operative Mortality after Elective Repair of an Asymptomatic Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in the Netherlands: a Retrospective Analysis of 2013 to 2018.编辑精选 - 荷兰择期修复无症状腹主动脉瘤患者的围手术期死亡率的性别相关差异:2013 年至 2018 年的回顾性分析。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019 Dec;58(6):813-820. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.05.017. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
5
Post-stress perfusion abnormalities detected on myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography predict long-term mortality after elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.应激后心肌灌注单光子发射计算机断层扫描显示的灌注异常可预测择期腹主动脉瘤修复术后的长期死亡率。
Circ J. 2013;77(5):1229-34. doi: 10.1253/circj.cj-12-1355. Epub 2013 Feb 2.
6
Contemporary outcomes of open complex abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.开放性复杂腹主动脉瘤修复术的当代疗效
J Vasc Surg. 2016 May;63(5):1195-200. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.12.038.
7
Use of the multiple uptake gated acquisition scan for the preoperative assessment of cardiac risk.使用多重摄取门控采集扫描进行术前心脏风险评估。
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1988 Sep;167(3):234-8.
8
Sex-related trends in mortality after elective abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery between 2002 and 2013 at National Health Service hospitals in England: less benefit for women compared with men.2002 年至 2013 年英格兰国民保健服务医院择期腹主动脉瘤手术后与性别相关的死亡率趋势:女性与男性相比获益较少。
Eur Heart J. 2016 Dec 7;37(46):3452-3460. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw335. Epub 2016 Aug 12.
9
Interaction between frailty and sex on mortality after elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.衰弱与性别对择期腹主动脉瘤修复术后死亡率的交互作用。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Dec;70(6):1831-1843. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.01.086. Epub 2019 May 27.
10
Differences in patient selection and outcomes based on abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter thresholds in the Vascular Quality Initiative.血管质量倡议中基于腹主动脉瘤直径阈值的患者选择和结局差异。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Nov;70(5):1446-1455. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.02.053. Epub 2019 May 27.

本文引用的文献

1
The UK EndoVascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR) trials: randomised trials of EVAR versus standard therapy.英国血管内动脉瘤修复 (EVAR) 试验:EVAR 与标准治疗的随机试验。
Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(9):1-218. doi: 10.3310/hta16090.
2
Preoperative cardiac evaluation and perioperative cardiac therapy in patients undergoing open surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysms: effects on cardiovascular outcome.腹主动脉瘤开放手术患者的术前心脏评估及围手术期心脏治疗:对心血管结局的影响
Ann Vasc Surg. 2012 Feb;26(2):156-65. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2011.06.019.
3
Predictors of outcome after elective endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair and external validation of a risk prediction model.
择期血管内腹主动脉瘤修复术后结局的预测因素和风险预测模型的外部验证。
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Sep;54(3):644-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.03.217. Epub 2011 Jul 23.
4
The Glasgow Aneurysm Score does not predict mortality after open abdominal aortic aneurysm in the era of endovascular aneurysm repair.格拉斯哥动脉瘤评分不能预测血管内动脉瘤修复时代开放腹主动脉瘤手术后的死亡率。
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Aug;54(2):353-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.01.029. Epub 2011 Mar 31.
5
The Vascular Study Group of New England Cardiac Risk Index (VSG-CRI) predicts cardiac complications more accurately than the Revised Cardiac Risk Index in vascular surgery patients.新英格兰心血管风险指数(VSG-CRI)血管外科患者的血管研究小组预测心脏并发症比修订后的心血管风险指数更准确。
J Vasc Surg. 2010 Sep;52(3):674-83, 683.e1-683.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.03.031. Epub 2010 Jun 8.
6
Defining high-risk patients for endovascular aneurysm repair.确定血管内动脉瘤修复的高危患者。
J Vasc Surg. 2009 Dec;50(6):1271-9.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.06.061. Epub 2009 Sep 26.
7
Perioperative asymptomatic cardiac damage after endovascular abdominal aneurysm repair is associated with poor long-term outcome.血管腔内腹主动脉瘤修复术后围手术期无症状性心脏损伤与长期预后不良相关。
J Vasc Surg. 2009 Oct;50(4):749-54; discussion 754. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.04.069. Epub 2009 Jun 27.
8
Risk prediction for perioperative mortality of endovascular vs open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms using the Medicare population.利用医疗保险人群对腹主动脉瘤血管内修复与开放修复围手术期死亡率进行风险预测。
J Vasc Surg. 2009 Aug;50(2):256-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.01.044. Epub 2009 Feb 26.
9
Objective risk-scoring systems for repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: applicability in endovascular repair?腹主动脉瘤修复的客观风险评分系统:在血管内修复中的适用性?
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2008 Aug;36(2):172-177. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2008.03.007. Epub 2008 May 15.
10
Comparison and co-relation of invasive and noninvasive methods of ejection fraction measurement.射血分数测量的侵入性和非侵入性方法的比较及相关性
J Natl Med Assoc. 2007 Nov;99(11):1227-8, 1231-4.