• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微容量细胞术研究肝转运体(MDR1 和 MRP2)在炎症相关的特异质药物性肝毒性中的作用。

Implication of hepatic transporters (MDR1 and MRP2) in inflammation-associated idiosyncratic drug-induced hepatotoxicity investigated by microvolume cytometry.

机构信息

UMR CNRS 7200, Laboratoire d'Innovation Thérapeutique, Université de Strasbourg, FMTS, Faculté de Pharmacie, Illkirch, France.

出版信息

Cytometry A. 2013 Apr;83(4):403-8. doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.22263. Epub 2013 Feb 11.

DOI:10.1002/cyto.a.22263
PMID:23401306
Abstract

Idiosyncratic drug-induced hepatotoxicity accounts for about 13% of all cases of acute liver failure, therefore cited as the most frequent reason for post-marketing drug withdrawal. Despite this, the underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood due to lack in adequate screening assays and predictive in vitro models. Hepatic transporters play a crucial role in the absorption, distribution, and elimination of both endogenous substrates and xenobiotics. Defects in transporter function can lead to altered drug disposition, including toxicity and loss of efficacy. Inflammation is one condition for demonstrated variable drug response, attributed in part, to changes in function of drug transporters. The present study investigates the implication of two important hepatic transporters (MDR1 and MRP2) in idiosyncratic drug-induced hepatotoxicity in the presence and absence of an inflammatory context. The synergistic effect of idiosyncratic drugs (Trovafloxacin, nimesulide, telithromycin, and nefazodone) and inflammatory stimuli (TNF-α + LPS) on the efflux activity of hepatic transporters was studied using microvolume cytometry. Our results demonstrated on the one hand that both MDR1 and MRP2 are variably implicated in idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury and on the other hand that the occurrence of an inflammatory reaction during idiosyncratic drug therapy can noticeably modulate this implication. In the absence of an inflammatory stress, none of the four tested drugs modulated the efflux activity of MRP2; nevertheless telithromycin and nefazodone inhibited the efflux activity of MDR1. Upon occurrence of an inflammatory stress, the inhibitory potential of trovafloxacin, nimesulide, and nefazodone on the efflux activity of MRP2 was noticeably revealed, while the telithromycin and nefazodone-induced inhibition of MDR1 was clearly attenuated. Knowledge of underlying mechanisms may significantly contribute to elimination of potential hepatotoxic drugs long before marketing and to prevention of drug-induced hepatotoxicity.

摘要

药物性肝损伤的个体差异约占所有急性肝衰竭病例的 13%,因此被认为是上市后药物撤市的最常见原因。尽管如此,由于缺乏充分的筛选检测和预测性体外模型,其潜在机制仍知之甚少。肝转运蛋白在内外源底物和外源性物质的吸收、分布和消除中起着至关重要的作用。转运蛋白功能的缺陷可导致药物处置的改变,包括毒性和疗效丧失。炎症是药物反应个体差异的一个条件,部分归因于药物转运蛋白功能的变化。本研究调查了两种重要的肝转运蛋白(MDR1 和 MRP2)在存在和不存在炎症环境下的药物性肝损伤的个体差异中的作用。使用微量细胞术研究了药物性肝损伤(曲伐沙星、尼美舒利、泰利霉素和奈法唑酮)和炎症刺激(TNF-α+LPS)协同作用对肝转运体外排活性的影响。我们的结果一方面表明,MDR1 和 MRP2 均不同程度地参与了药物性肝损伤,另一方面,在药物性肝损伤治疗过程中发生炎症反应会明显调节这种参与。在没有炎症应激的情况下,四种测试药物均未调节 MRP2 的外排活性;然而,泰利霉素和奈法唑酮抑制了 MDR1 的外排活性。发生炎症应激时,曲伐沙星、尼美舒利和奈法唑酮对 MRP2 外排活性的抑制作用明显显现,而泰利霉素和奈法唑酮诱导的 MDR1 抑制作用明显减弱。了解潜在机制可能会在药物上市前显著有助于消除潜在的肝毒性药物,并预防药物性肝损伤。

相似文献

1
Implication of hepatic transporters (MDR1 and MRP2) in inflammation-associated idiosyncratic drug-induced hepatotoxicity investigated by microvolume cytometry.微容量细胞术研究肝转运体(MDR1 和 MRP2)在炎症相关的特异质药物性肝毒性中的作用。
Cytometry A. 2013 Apr;83(4):403-8. doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.22263. Epub 2013 Feb 11.
2
Trovafloxacin-induced replication stress sensitizes HepG2 cells to tumor necrosis factor-alpha-induced cytotoxicity mediated by extracellular signal-regulated kinase and ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related.曲伐沙星诱导的复制应激使HepG2细胞对由细胞外信号调节激酶以及共济失调毛细血管扩张症突变基因和Rad3相关蛋白介导的肿瘤坏死因子-α诱导的细胞毒性敏感。
Toxicology. 2015 May 4;331:35-46. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2015.03.002. Epub 2015 Mar 5.
3
TNFα enhances trovafloxacin-induced in vitro hepatotoxicity by inhibiting protective autophagy.TNFα 通过抑制保护性自噬增强了托氟沙星的体外肝毒性。
Toxicol Lett. 2021 May 15;342:73-84. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2021.02.009. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
4
Synergistic drug-cytokine induction of hepatocellular death as an in vitro approach for the study of inflammation-associated idiosyncratic drug hepatotoxicity.药物与细胞因子协同诱导肝细胞死亡作为研究炎症相关性特异质性药物肝毒性的体外方法
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2009 Jun 15;237(3):317-30. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2009.04.002. Epub 2009 Apr 9.
5
3.3 Trovafloxacin: a case study of idiosyncratic or iatrogenic liver toxicity - molecular mechanisms and lessons for pharmacotoxicity.3.3 曲伐沙星:特异质性或医源性肝毒性的案例研究——分子机制及药物毒性教训
Hum Exp Toxicol. 2009 Feb;28(2-3):119-21. doi: 10.1177/0960327109105767.
6
Molecular mechanisms of hepatocellular apoptosis induced by trovafloxacin-tumor necrosis factor-alpha interaction.曲伐沙星-肿瘤坏死因子-α相互作用诱导肝细胞凋亡的分子机制。
Toxicol Sci. 2014 Jan;137(1):91-101. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kft226. Epub 2013 Oct 4.
7
Tumor necrosis factor alpha is a proximal mediator of synergistic hepatotoxicity from trovafloxacin/lipopolysaccharide coexposure.肿瘤坏死因子α是曲伐沙星/脂多糖共同暴露所致协同肝毒性的近端介质。
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2009 Jan;328(1):62-8. doi: 10.1124/jpet.108.143792. Epub 2008 Sep 26.
8
Microarray analysis of lipopolysaccharide potentiation of trovafloxacin-induced liver injury in rats suggests a role for proinflammatory chemokines and neutrophils.对大鼠中罗氟沙星诱导的肝损伤的脂多糖增强作用进行微阵列分析,提示促炎趋化因子和中性粒细胞起了一定作用。
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2006 Mar;316(3):1080-7. doi: 10.1124/jpet.105.096347. Epub 2005 Nov 18.
9
Lipopolysaccharide and trovafloxacin coexposure in mice causes idiosyncrasy-like liver injury dependent on tumor necrosis factor-alpha.脂多糖与曲伐沙星共同作用于小鼠会导致依赖肿瘤坏死因子-α的类特异质性肝损伤。
Toxicol Sci. 2007 Nov;100(1):259-66. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfm218. Epub 2007 Aug 19.
10
Tissue influx of neutrophils and monocytes is delayed during development of trovafloxacin-induced tumor necrosis factor-dependent liver injury in mice.在小鼠中,曲伐沙星诱导的肿瘤坏死因子依赖性肝损伤的发展过程中,中性粒细胞和单核细胞的组织内流被延迟。
J Appl Toxicol. 2018 May;38(5):753-765. doi: 10.1002/jat.3585. Epub 2018 Jan 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Molecular and Clinical Links between Drug-Induced Cholestasis and Familial Intrahepatic Cholestasis.药物性胆汁淤积与家族性肝内胆汁淤积的分子和临床联系。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Mar 18;24(6):5823. doi: 10.3390/ijms24065823.
2
A cell lines derived microfluidic liver model for investigation of hepatotoxicity induced by drug-drug interaction.一种源自细胞系的微流控肝脏模型,用于研究药物相互作用诱导的肝毒性。
Biomicrofluidics. 2019 Mar 7;13(2):024101. doi: 10.1063/1.5070088. eCollection 2019 Mar.
3
From the Cover: Three-Dimensional (3D) HepaRG Spheroid Model With Physiologically Relevant Xenobiotic Metabolism Competence and Hepatocyte Functionality for Liver Toxicity Screening.
封面故事:具有生理相关外源物质代谢能力和肝细胞功能的三维 HepaRG 球体模型,用于肝脏毒性筛选。
Toxicol Sci. 2017 Sep 1;159(1):124-136. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfx122.
4
Idiosyncratic Drug-Induced Liver Injury (IDILI): Potential Mechanisms and Predictive Assays.特异质性药物性肝损伤(IDILI):潜在机制与预测检测方法
Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:9176937. doi: 10.1155/2017/9176937. Epub 2017 Jan 4.
5
Hepatoprotective Effect of A Polyherbal Extract Containing Andrographis Paniculata, Tinospora Cordifolia and Solanum Nigrum Against Paracetamol Induced Hepatotoxicity.一种含有穿心莲、心叶青牛胆和龙葵的多草药提取物对扑热息痛诱导的肝毒性的肝保护作用。
Pharmacogn Mag. 2015 Oct;11(Suppl 3):S375-9. doi: 10.4103/0973-1296.168945.
6
Evaluation of Adverse Drug Properties with Cryopreserved Human Hepatocytes and the Integrated Discrete Multiple Organ Co-culture (IdMOC(TM)) System.利用冻存人肝细胞和集成离散多器官共培养(IdMOC™)系统评估药物不良性质
Toxicol Res. 2015 Jun;31(2):137-49. doi: 10.5487/TR.2015.31.2.137.
7
In vitro platforms for evaluating liver toxicity.用于评估肝脏毒性的体外平台。
Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2014 Sep;239(9):1180-1191. doi: 10.1177/1535370214531872. Epub 2014 Apr 24.
8
Selective and cytokine-dependent regulation of hepatic transporters and bile acid homeostasis during infectious colitis in mice.在感染性结肠炎小鼠中,肝转运体和胆汁酸动态平衡的选择性和细胞因子依赖性调节。
Drug Metab Dispos. 2014 Apr;42(4):596-602. doi: 10.1124/dmd.113.055525. Epub 2013 Dec 30.