Johnson G, Curry B, Cahalan L, Prater R, Biggerstaff J, Hussain A, Gartner M, Cahalan P
Ension, Inc, Pittsburgh, PA 15238, USA.
Perfusion. 2013 May;28(3):263-71. doi: 10.1177/0267659113475834. Epub 2013 Feb 11.
Intravenous administration of heparin and heparin-bonded extracorporeal circuits are frequently used to mitigate the deleterious effects of blood contact with synthetic materials. The work described here utilized human blood in a micro-perfusion circuit to experimentally examine the effects of intravenous and surface-bound heparin on cellular activation. Activation markers of coagulation and of the inflammatory response were examined using flow cytometry; specifically, markers of platelet, monocyte, polymorphonuclear leukocyte (PMN), and lymphocyte activation were quantified. The results indicate that surface-bound heparin reduces the inflammatory response whereas systemically administered heparin does not. This finding has important implications for blood-contacting devices, particularly within the context of recently elucidated connections between inflammation pathways and coagulation disorders. Data presented indicate that surface-bound heparin and intravenously administered heparin play distinct, but vital roles in rendering biomaterial surfaces compatible with blood.
静脉注射肝素和肝素结合体外循环常用于减轻血液与合成材料接触的有害影响。此处所述的研究利用微灌注回路中的人体血液,通过实验检验静脉注射肝素和表面结合肝素对细胞活化的影响。使用流式细胞术检测凝血和炎症反应的活化标志物;具体而言,对血小板、单核细胞、多形核白细胞(PMN)和淋巴细胞活化的标志物进行了定量分析。结果表明,表面结合肝素可减轻炎症反应,而全身给药的肝素则无此作用。这一发现对血液接触装置具有重要意义,尤其是在最近阐明的炎症途径与凝血障碍之间的联系这一背景下。所呈现的数据表明,表面结合肝素和静脉注射肝素在使生物材料表面与血液相容方面发挥着不同但至关重要的作用。