Department of Pediatric Oncology/Hematology, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children’s Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Haematologica. 2013 May;98(5):753-9. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2012.073510. Epub 2013 Feb 12.
Asparaginase is an expensive drug, but important in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. In order to compare costs of PEGasparaginase, Erwinia asparaginase and native E. coli asparaginase, we performed a cost-analysis in the Dutch Childhood Oncology Group ALL-10 medium-risk group intensification protocol. Treatment costs were calculated based on patient level data of 84 subjects, and were related to the occurrence of allergy to PEGasparaginase. Simultaneously, decision tree and sensitivity analyses were conducted. The total costs of the intensification course of 30 weeks were $57,893 in patients without PEGasparaginase allergy (n=64). The costs were significantly higher ($113,558) in case of allergy (n=20) necessitating a switch to Erwinia asparaginase. Simulated scenarios (decision tree analysis) using native E. coli asparaginase in intensification showed that the costs of PEGasparaginase were equal to those of native E. coli asparaginase. Also after sensitivity analyses, the costs for PEGasparaginase were equal to those of native E. coli asparaginase. Intensification treatment with native E. coli asparaginase, followed by a switch to PEGasparaginase, and subsequently to Erwinia asparaginase in case of allergy had similar overall costs compared to the treatment with PEGasparaginase as the first-line drug (followed by Erwinia asparaginase in the case of allergy). PEGasparaginase is preferred over native E. coli asparaginase, because it is administered less frequently, with less day care visits. PEGasparaginase is less immunogenic than native E. coli asparaginase and is not more expensive. Asparaginase costs are mainly determined by the percentage of patients who are allergic and require a switch to Erwinia asparaginase.
门冬酰胺酶是一种昂贵的药物,但在儿童急性淋巴细胞白血病中非常重要。为了比较聚乙二醇化门冬酰胺酶、欧文氏菌门冬酰胺酶和天然大肠杆菌门冬酰胺酶的成本,我们在荷兰儿童肿瘤学组 ALL-10 中危组强化方案中进行了成本分析。根据 84 名患者的个体数据计算治疗成本,并与对聚乙二醇化门冬酰胺酶过敏的发生相关。同时进行了决策树和敏感性分析。在没有聚乙二醇化门冬酰胺酶过敏的患者(n=64)中,30 周强化疗程的总费用为 57893 美元。在需要改用欧文氏菌门冬酰胺酶的过敏患者(n=20)中,费用显著更高(113558 美元)。使用强化中的天然大肠杆菌门冬酰胺酶进行模拟场景(决策树分析)显示,聚乙二醇化门冬酰胺酶的成本与天然大肠杆菌门冬酰胺酶的成本相等。在敏感性分析后,聚乙二醇化门冬酰胺酶的成本也与天然大肠杆菌门冬酰胺酶的成本相等。在强化治疗中使用天然大肠杆菌门冬酰胺酶,然后在过敏的情况下改用聚乙二醇化门冬酰胺酶,随后在过敏的情况下改用欧文氏菌门冬酰胺酶,与将聚乙二醇化门冬酰胺酶作为一线药物(在过敏的情况下改用欧文氏菌门冬酰胺酶)的治疗相比,总费用相似。聚乙二醇化门冬酰胺酶优于天然大肠杆菌门冬酰胺酶,因为它的给药频率较低,日间护理就诊次数较少。聚乙二醇化门冬酰胺酶比天然大肠杆菌门冬酰胺酶的免疫原性更低,且价格不更高。门冬酰胺酶的成本主要取决于过敏并需要改用欧文氏菌门冬酰胺酶的患者比例。