Department of Zoology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA.
PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e54988. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054988. Epub 2013 Feb 6.
Based on regional-scale studies, aboveground production and litter decomposition are thought to positively covary, because they are driven by shared biotic and climatic factors. Until now we have been unable to test whether production and decomposition are generally coupled across climatically dissimilar regions, because we lacked replicated data collected within a single vegetation type across multiple regions, obfuscating the drivers and generality of the association between production and decomposition. Furthermore, our understanding of the relationships between production and decomposition rests heavily on separate meta-analyses of each response, because no studies have simultaneously measured production and the accumulation or decomposition of litter using consistent methods at globally relevant scales. Here, we use a multi-country grassland dataset collected using a standardized protocol to show that live plant biomass (an estimate of aboveground net primary production) and litter disappearance (represented by mass loss of aboveground litter) do not strongly covary. Live biomass and litter disappearance varied at different spatial scales. There was substantial variation in live biomass among continents, sites and plots whereas among continent differences accounted for most of the variation in litter disappearance rates. Although there were strong associations among aboveground biomass, litter disappearance and climatic factors in some regions (e.g. U.S. Great Plains), these relationships were inconsistent within and among the regions represented by this study. These results highlight the importance of replication among regions and continents when characterizing the correlations between ecosystem processes and interpreting their global-scale implications for carbon flux. We must exercise caution in parameterizing litter decomposition and aboveground production in future regional and global carbon models as their relationship is complex.
基于区域尺度的研究,地上生物量生产和凋落物分解被认为是正相关的,因为它们受共同的生物和气候因素驱动。到目前为止,我们还无法测试地上生物量生产和凋落物分解是否在气候差异较大的地区普遍相关,因为我们缺乏在多个地区内跨单个植被类型收集的重复数据,这掩盖了两者之间的关系的驱动因素和普遍性。此外,我们对地上生物量生产和凋落物分解之间关系的理解主要依赖于对每个反应的单独荟萃分析,因为没有研究同时使用一致的方法在全球相关尺度上同时测量地上生物量生产和凋落物的积累或分解。在这里,我们使用一个多国家草原数据集,该数据集是使用标准化协议收集的,结果表明活植物生物量(地上净初级生产力的估计值)和凋落物消失(以上地凋落物的质量损失表示)之间没有强烈的相关性。活生物质和凋落物消失在不同的空间尺度上变化。在大陆、地点和样地之间存在活生物质的大量差异,而在大陆之间的差异占凋落物消失率变化的大部分。尽管在一些地区(例如美国大平原),地上生物量、凋落物消失与气候因素之间存在强烈的相关性,但这些关系在本研究所代表的地区内和地区之间并不一致。这些结果强调了在描述生态系统过程之间的相关性并解释其对全球碳通量的影响时,在地区和大陆之间进行复制的重要性。在未来的区域和全球碳模型中,我们必须谨慎地将凋落物分解和地上生物量生产参数化,因为它们之间的关系很复杂。