Suppr超能文献

定义青少年体脂率:AFAD-A 分类建议。

Defining body fatness in adolescents: a proposal of the AFAD-A classification.

机构信息

Research Group on Community Nutrition and Oxidative Stress, University of Balearic Islands, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e55849. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055849. Epub 2013 Feb 6.

Abstract

AIMS

Body mass index (BMI) shows several limitations as indicator of fatness. Using the International Obesity Task Force (IOTF) reference and the World Health Organization (WHO) standard 2007 on the same dataset yielded widely different rates. At higher levels, BMI and the BMI cut-offs may be help in informing a clinical judgement, but at levels near the norm additional criteria may be needed. This study compares the prevalence of overweight and obesity using IOTF and WHO-2007 references and interprets body composition by comparing measures of BMI and body fatness (fat mass index, FMI; and waist-to-height ratio, WHtR) among an adolescent population.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A random sample (n = 1231) of adolescent population (12-17 years old) was interviewed. Weight, height, waist circumference, triceps and subscapular skinfolds were used to calculate BMI, FMI, and WHtR. The prevalence of overweight and obesity were 12.3% and 15.4% (WHO standards) and 18.6% and 6.1% (IOTF definition). Despite that IOTF cut-offs misclassified less often than WHO standards, BMI categories were combined with FMI and WHtR resulting in the Adiposity & Fat Distribution for adolescents (AFAD-A) classification, which identified the following groups normal-weight normal-fat (73.2%), normal-weight overfat (2.1%), overweight normal-fat (6.7%), overweight overfat (11.9%) and obesity (6.1%), and also classified overweight at risk and obese adolescents into type-I (9.5% and 1.3%, respectively) and type-II (2.3% and 4.9%, respectively) depending if they had or not abdominal fatness.

CONCLUSIONS

There are differences between IOTF and WHO-2007 international references and there is a misclassification when adiposity is considered. The BMI limitations, especially for overweight identification, could be reduced by adding an estimate of both adiposity (FMI) and fat distribution (WHtR). The AFAD-A classification could be useful in clinical and population health to identify overfat adolescent and those who have greater risk of developing weight-related cardiovascular diseases according to the BMI category.

摘要

目的

体重指数 (BMI) 作为肥胖指标存在多种局限性。在同一数据集上使用国际肥胖工作组 (IOTF) 参考标准和世界卫生组织 (WHO) 2007 标准得出的肥胖率差异很大。在较高水平上,BMI 和 BMI 切点可能有助于提供临床判断,但在接近正常值的水平上,可能需要额外的标准。本研究比较了使用 IOTF 和 WHO-2007 参考标准的超重和肥胖患病率,并通过比较青少年人群的 BMI 和体脂量 (体脂肪指数 FMI 和腰高比 WHtR) 来解释身体成分。

方法和结果

对随机抽取的青少年人群(12-17 岁)样本(n=1231)进行了访谈。体重、身高、腰围、肱三头肌和肩胛下皮褶厚度用于计算 BMI、FMI 和 WHtR。超重和肥胖的患病率分别为 12.3%和 15.4%(WHO 标准)和 18.6%和 6.1%(IOTF 定义)。尽管 IOTF 切点的错误分类频率较低,但 BMI 类别与 FMI 和 WHtR 相结合,产生了青少年的肥胖和脂肪分布 (AFAD-A) 分类,该分类确定了以下人群:正常体重正常脂肪(73.2%)、正常体重超重(2.1%)、超重正常脂肪(6.7%)、超重超重(11.9%)和肥胖(6.1%),并根据是否存在腹部肥胖,将超重和肥胖青少年分别归类为 I 型(分别为 9.5%和 1.3%)和 II 型(分别为 2.3%和 4.9%)。

结论

IOTF 和 WHO-2007 国际参考标准之间存在差异,并且在考虑肥胖时存在错误分类。通过增加体脂量(FMI)和脂肪分布(WHtR)的估计,BMI 的局限性,特别是在超重识别方面,可以得到减少。AFAD-A 分类在临床和人群健康中可能很有用,可以根据 BMI 类别识别超重的青少年和那些有更大患与体重相关的心血管疾病风险的人。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4639/3566104/c8f02a36c7f8/pone.0055849.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验