• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

墨西哥使用一种新的低渗口服补液溶液的临床经验。

Clinical experience in Mexico with a new oral rehydration solution with lower osmolality.

作者信息

Velásquez-Jones L, Becerra F C, Faure A, de León M, Moreno H, Maulén I, Abraham-Jalil A, Muraira A

机构信息

Hospital Infantil de Mexico Federico Gomez, Mexico City.

出版信息

Clin Ther. 1990;12 Suppl A:95-103.

PMID:2340539
Abstract

A clinical trial was conducted to compare the safety and efficacy of a new oral rehydration solution (ORS) with that of the ORS recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO). One hundred thirty infants with dehydration due to acute diarrhea were randomized into two groups: 68 infants received the WHO ORS containing sodium and glucose in a concentration of 90 and 111 mmol/L, respectively, and an osmolality of 311 mosm/kg (ORS-90); 62 infants received an ORS containing sodium and glucose in a concentration of 60 and 90 mmol/L, respectively, with an osmolality of 240 mosm/kg (ORS-60). Treatment failure was noted in seven infants (10.3%) in the ORS-90 group; the causes of failure were high stool output (three cases), persistent vomiting (three cases), and ileus (one case). Only one patient in the ORS-60 group (1.6%) was considered a failure because of high stool output. No significant differences were noted in the serum sodium levels in either group of patients, both in relation to the natremia seen on admittance or that seen after rehydration. A trend was observed toward correction of hypernatremia or hyponatremia with both types of ORS. A similar situation was observed with respect to the variations seen in serum potassium levels. The results from this study suggest that there may be clinical advantages of using an ORS with concentrations of sodium and glucose and a total osmolality lower than that of ORS-90, because of the lower incidence of treatment failures.

摘要

开展了一项临床试验,比较一种新型口服补液盐(ORS)与世界卫生组织(WHO)推荐的ORS的安全性和有效性。130名因急性腹泻而脱水的婴儿被随机分为两组:68名婴儿接受WHO的ORS,其中钠和葡萄糖浓度分别为90 mmol/L和111 mmol/L,渗透压为311 mosm/kg(ORS-90);62名婴儿接受一种ORS,其中钠和葡萄糖浓度分别为60 mmol/L和90 mmol/L,渗透压为240 mosm/kg(ORS-60)。ORS-90组有7名婴儿(10.3%)治疗失败;失败原因是大便排出量高(3例)、持续呕吐(3例)和肠梗阻(1例)。ORS-60组只有1名患者(1.6%)因大便排出量高被视为治疗失败。两组患者的血清钠水平,无论是入院时的血钠情况还是补液后的血钠情况,均未观察到显著差异。两种类型的ORS在纠正高钠血症或低钠血症方面均观察到一种趋势。血清钾水平的变化情况也类似。这项研究的结果表明,使用钠和葡萄糖浓度及总渗透压低于ORS-90的ORS可能具有临床优势,因为治疗失败的发生率较低。

相似文献

1
Clinical experience in Mexico with a new oral rehydration solution with lower osmolality.墨西哥使用一种新的低渗口服补液溶液的临床经验。
Clin Ther. 1990;12 Suppl A:95-103.
2
[Comparative study of 2 oral rehydration solutions containing 60 or 90 mmol/L of sodium and with different osmolalities].含60或90毫摩尔/升钠且渗透压不同的两种口服补液溶液的对比研究
Bol Med Hosp Infant Mex. 1990 Sep;47(9):630-5.
3
[Oral rehydration solutions with 60 or 90 nmol/L of sodium for infants with acute diarrhea in accord with their nutritional status].根据营养状况为急性腹泻婴儿提供含60或90纳摩尔/升钠的口服补液盐
Bol Med Hosp Infant Mex. 1990 Nov;47(11):760-6.
4
Efficacy of standard glucose-based and reduced-osmolarity maltodextrin-based oral rehydration solutions: effect of sugar malabsorption.基于标准葡萄糖和低渗麦芽糊精的口服补液溶液的疗效:糖吸收不良的影响。
Bull World Health Organ. 1996;74(5):471-7.
5
Low osmolar oral rehydration salts solution in the treatment of acute watery diarrhoea in neonates and young infants: a randomized, controlled clinical trial.低渗口服补液盐溶液治疗新生儿和小婴儿急性水样腹泻:一项随机对照临床试验
J Health Popul Nutr. 2005 Mar;23(1):52-7.
6
Comparison of two oral rehydration solutions in children with gastroenteritis in Australia.
Clin Ther. 1990;12 Suppl A:81-5.
7
Standard WHO-ORS versus reduced-osmolarity ORS in the management of cholera patients.在霍乱患者管理中标准的世界卫生组织口服补液盐与低渗口服补液盐的比较。
J Health Popul Nutr. 2006 Mar;24(1):107-12.
8
Controlled trial of hypo-osmalar versus World Health Organization oral rehydration solution.低渗溶液与世界卫生组织口服补液盐的对照试验。
Indian Pediatr. 2000 Sep;37(9):952-60.
9
A double-blind clinical trial comparing World Health Organization oral rehydration solution with a reduced osmolarity solution containing equal amounts of sodium and glucose.一项双盲临床试验,比较世界卫生组织口服补液盐与含有等量钠和葡萄糖的低渗溶液。
J Pediatr. 1996 Jan;128(1):45-51. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(96)70426-2.
10
Osmolality electrolyte and carbohydrate type and oral rehydration solutions: a controlled study to compare the efficacy of two commercially available solutions (osmolalities 240 mmol/L and 340 mmol/L).渗透压、电解质、碳水化合物类型与口服补液溶液:一项比较两种市售溶液(渗透压分别为240 mmol/L和340 mmol/L)疗效的对照研究。
J Diarrhoeal Dis Res. 1993 Dec;11(4):222-6.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of oral rehydration solution and recommended home fluids on diarrhoea mortality.口服补液盐和推荐的家庭补液对腹泻死亡率的影响。
Int J Epidemiol. 2010 Apr;39 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i75-87. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyq025.
2
Reduced osmolarity oral rehydration solution for treating dehydration due to diarrhoea in children: systematic review.低渗口服补液盐治疗儿童腹泻所致脱水:系统评价
BMJ. 2001 Jul 14;323(7304):81-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7304.81.
3
Reduced osmolarity oral rehydration solution for treating dehydration caused by acute diarrhoea in children.
低渗口服补液盐用于治疗儿童急性腹泻引起的脱水。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;2002(2):CD002847. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002847.
4
Acute gastroenteritis in Europe and the use of oral rehydration therapy.欧洲的急性肠胃炎及口服补液疗法的应用
Clin Investig. 1994 Feb;72(3):167-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00189307.