Suppr超能文献

工作要求-控制-社会支持模型和应对策略:预测一组意大利护士的倦怠和幸福感。

Job demands-control-social support model and coping strategies: predicting burnout and wellbeing in a group of Italian nurses.

机构信息

Leiden University, Institute of Psychology, Clinical, Health and Neuropsychology Unit, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Med Lav. 2012 Nov-Dec;103(6):466-81.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Nursing is generally considered to be a stressful profession.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of the present study was to test the core hypotheses of the job demands-control-social support model (JDCS) of Karasek & Theorell (1990). In order to refine and extend the JDCS model, we also analyzed the direct and interactive role of three coping strategies: task- oriented, emotion-oriented, and avoidance-oriented coping.

METHODS

Questionnaire data from 1383 nurses (77%female) were collected.

RESULTS

Controlling for demographic variables and non-linearity of the associations between job characteristics and outcomes (job satisfaction; burnout dimensions, psychological distress, and somatic complaints), hierarchical regression analyses indicated that job control and social support combined additively (p < 0.001) with job demands to explain the wellbeing outcomes (explained variance between 6% and 28%). Coping strategies accounted for additional variance (p < 0.001; explained variance between 4% and 15%) in all outcomes except in job satisfaction. Support was found for main effects of coping. Coping strategies did not moderate the impact of job characteristics on burnout and wellbeing. Emotion-oriented coping emerged as the most important predictor and was consistently associated with higher burnout levels and lower wellbeing levels.

CONCLUSIONS

The results demonstrated the need to include the role of individual variables in the JDCS model. The limitations of the study, and theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

摘要

背景

护理通常被认为是一个压力很大的职业。

目的

本研究旨在检验 Karasek 和 Theorell(1990)的工作要求-控制-社会支持模型(JDCS)的核心假设。为了完善和扩展 JDCS 模型,我们还分析了三种应对策略(任务导向、情绪导向和回避导向应对)的直接和交互作用。

方法

从 1383 名护士(77%为女性)中收集了问卷调查数据。

结果

在控制了人口统计学变量和工作特征与结果(工作满意度;倦怠维度、心理困扰和躯体抱怨)之间的关联的非线性之后,分层回归分析表明,工作控制和社会支持共同(p<0.001)与工作需求一起解释了健康结果(解释方差在 6%到 28%之间)。应对策略在所有结果(除了工作满意度)中都解释了额外的方差(p<0.001;解释方差在 4%到 15%之间)。应对的主要效应得到了支持。应对策略并没有调节工作特征对倦怠和健康的影响。情绪导向应对是最重要的预测因素,它与更高的倦怠水平和更低的健康水平始终相关。

结论

结果表明,需要在 JDCS 模型中纳入个体变量的作用。讨论了研究的局限性以及理论和实践意义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验