Oral Health Cooperative Research Centre, Melbourne Dental School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.
Caries Res. 2013;47(4):265-72. doi: 10.1159/000346917. Epub 2013 Feb 12.
The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review of economic evaluations (EEs) of dental caries prevention programs to objectively retrieve, synthesize and describe available information on the field. Several strategies were combined to search for literature published between January 1975 and April 2012. MEDLINE, EconoLit and ISI formed the basis of the literature search. The study selection was done using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Bibliographic listings of all retrieved articles were hand-searched. The search identified 206 references. An evaluative framework was developed based on the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination's 'Guidance for undertaking reviews in health care' (York University, 2009). Background information included publication vehicle, year of publication, geographic focus, type of preventive program and type of economic analysis. 63 studies were included in the review. The most common preventive strategies evaluated were dental sealants (n = 13), water fluoridation (n = 12) and mixed interventions (n = 12). By type of EE undertaken, 30 were cost-effectiveness analyses, 22 were cost-benefit analyses, and 5 presented both cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit analyses. Few studies were cost-utility analyses (n = 5) or cost minimization analyses (n = 2). By year of publication, most were published after 2003. The review revealed that, although the number of publications reporting EEs has increased significantly in recent years, the quality of the reporting needs to be improved. The main methodological problems identified in the review were the limited information provided on adjustments for discounting in addition to inadequate sensitivity analyses. Attention also needs to be given to the analysis and interpretation of the results of the EEs.
本研究旨在对口腔龋齿预防项目的经济评估(EE)进行系统评价,以客观地检索、综合和描述该领域的现有信息。采用了多种策略相结合的方式,搜索了 1975 年 1 月至 2012 年 4 月期间发表的文献。MEDLINE、EconoLit 和 ISI 构成了文献搜索的基础。研究选择使用了预先设定的纳入和排除标准。所有检索到的文章的参考文献列表都进行了手工搜索。搜索共确定了 206 篇参考文献。根据约克大学(York University)“卫生保健中进行评价的指南”(2009 年),制定了评估框架。背景信息包括出版载体、出版年份、地理重点、预防计划类型和经济分析类型。共有 63 项研究被纳入综述。评估中最常见的预防策略包括牙面封闭(n=13)、饮水氟化(n=12)和混合干预(n=12)。按所进行的 EE 类型,30 项为成本效益分析,22 项为成本效益分析,5 项同时呈现成本效益和成本效益分析。成本效用分析(n=5)或成本最小化分析(n=2)很少。按出版年份,大多数发表于 2003 年后。综述显示,尽管近年来报告 EE 的出版物数量显著增加,但报告的质量需要提高。综述中发现的主要方法学问题除了敏感性分析不足外,还包括对折扣调整的信息提供有限。还需要注意 EE 结果的分析和解释。