Arslanian Brian, Mehrzad Raman, Kramer Thomas, Kim David C
From the *Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston; †Reliant Medical Group, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Worcester, MA; ‡Department of Surgery, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg, Sweden; and §University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA.
Ann Plast Surg. 2014 Aug;73(2):156-7. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e318276da4c.
This study aimed to introduce the technique and results of a forearm Bier block for upper extremity surgery.
Various techniques of anesthesia are used for hand surgery. Intravenous regional anesthesia, the Bier block, is an effective anesthetic technique. However, there exist several disadvantages and potential complications. We present our technique and results using the forearm Bier block.
A retrospective review was performed studying our experience using forearm Bier block from May to December of 2010. The technique involves exsanguination of the forearm and inflation of a pneumatic tourniquet placed distal to the elbow joint. Twenty-five milliliter of 0.5% lidocaine is injected intravenously. One hundred five patients underwent hand surgery using this technique. There were 53 females and 52 males with a median age of 56 years. In total, 121 procedures were performed. Patients were interviewed by telephone 24 hours postoperatively.
All patients received adequate anesthesia from the block. There were no intraoperative and no postoperative complications. There were no mechanical or tourniquet problems. Average tourniquet time was 10.1 minutes. Total operating time was less than 30 minutes.
Forearm Bier block presents several advantages over standard upper arm technique. Conventional Bier block involves a double tourniquet and a significant amount of lidocaine, which has potential cardiac and neurologic toxicity. Consequently, minimum tourniquet inflation time is 30 minutes. The dosage of lidocaine needed to provide analgesia using the forearm Bier block is significantly reduced, thereby minimizing the potential for these complications. This lower dose allows for shorter tourniquet time rather than the standard 30 minutes. This shorter tourniquet time in itself presents several advantages. Tourniquet pain and risk of ischemic problems are minimized, and efficiency is increased. This efficiency has practical and financial implications such as decreased total operating and recovery room times, decreased cost of medicines, and decreased operating time for the surgeon. Lastly, this technique might also be used for lower extremity surgeries.
Forearm Bier block is a safe and efficient method for upper extremity surgery. It significantly reduces the risk of complications and increases the efficiency of the surgeon and surgery facility.
本研究旨在介绍用于上肢手术的前臂静脉局部麻醉技术及结果。
手部手术使用多种麻醉技术。静脉区域麻醉即静脉局部麻醉是一种有效的麻醉技术。然而,它存在一些缺点和潜在并发症。我们介绍使用前臂静脉局部麻醉的技术及结果。
对2010年5月至12月使用前臂静脉局部麻醉的经验进行回顾性研究。该技术包括前臂驱血并在肘关节远端充气使用气压止血带。静脉注射25毫升0.5%利多卡因。105例患者使用该技术进行手部手术。其中女性53例,男性52例,中位年龄56岁。共进行了121例手术。术后24小时通过电话对患者进行随访。
所有患者均通过该阻滞获得了充分麻醉。无术中及术后并发症。无机械或止血带问题。平均止血带时间为10.1分钟。总手术时间少于30分钟。
与标准上臂技术相比,前臂静脉局部麻醉有几个优点。传统静脉局部麻醉需要双重止血带和大量利多卡因,利多卡因有潜在的心脏和神经毒性。因此,最短止血带充气时间为30分钟。使用前臂静脉局部麻醉提供镇痛所需的利多卡因剂量显著减少,从而将这些并发症的可能性降至最低。这种较低剂量允许更短的止血带时间,而非标准的30分钟。这种更短的止血带时间本身有几个优点。止血带疼痛和缺血问题风险降至最低,效率提高。这种效率在实际和经济方面都有影响,如减少总手术和恢复室时间、降低药品成本以及减少外科医生的手术时间。最后,该技术也可用于下肢手术。
前臂静脉局部麻醉是上肢手术的一种安全有效的方法。它显著降低了并发症风险,提高了外科医生和手术机构的效率。