Ryder Nuala, Leinonen Eeva
Department of Psychology, University of Hertfordshire, College Lane, Hatfield, Herts, AL10 9AB, UK,
J Psycholinguist Res. 2014 Feb;43(1):45-58. doi: 10.1007/s10936-013-9238-6.
This study focussed on young children's incorrect answers to pragmatically demanding questions. Children with specific language impairment (SLI), including a subgroup with pragmatic language difficulties (PLD) and typically developing children answered questions targeting implicatures, based on a storybook and short verbal scenarios. Ninety-seven children participated in this study: 30 children with SLI of whom 12 had PLD, 32 typically developing children aged 5-6 years and 35 aged 7-11 years. The incorrect answers produced by the children with SLI were similar in their use of context to those of the 5-6 year old, suggesting developmental delay. The children with PLD produced significantly more irrelevant answers than both the language impaired children without PLD and the typically developing groups and had most difficulty when the context was presented solely verbally. Results are discussed in relation to a cognitive theory of communication and the clinical implications.
本研究聚焦于幼儿对语用要求较高问题的错误回答。患有特定语言障碍(SLI)的儿童,包括一个有语用语言困难(PLD)的亚组,以及发育正常的儿童,根据一本故事书和简短的口头情景回答了针对隐含意义的问题。97名儿童参与了本研究:30名患有SLI的儿童,其中12名有PLD,32名5至6岁发育正常的儿童和35名7至11岁发育正常的儿童。患有SLI的儿童给出的错误答案在对语境的运用上与5至6岁儿童的相似,表明存在发育迟缓。患有PLD的儿童比没有PLD的语言障碍儿童和发育正常的儿童组给出的无关答案显著更多,并且当语境仅以口头形式呈现时遇到的困难最大。结合一种认知交流理论和临床意义对结果进行了讨论。