• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Use of context in question answering by 3-, 4- and 5-year-old children.

作者信息

Ryder Nuala, Leinonen Eeva

机构信息

University of Hertfordshire, Psychology Dept, Hatfield Campus, College Lane, Hatfield, Herts AL10 9AB.

出版信息

J Psycholinguist Res. 2003 Jul;32(4):397-415. doi: 10.1023/a:1024847529077.

DOI:10.1023/a:1024847529077
PMID:12964522
Abstract

This study investigates, within the theory of relevance of Sperber & Wilson (1995), how3-, 4-, and 5-year-old children (n = 45) use context when answering questions. The children were required to answer questions that placed differing contextual and processing demands on them, as predicted by the theory. The results indicate that an increasing ability to use complex contextual information was related to age and was reflected in the children's ability to answer questions appropriately. A developmental pattern became evident in terms of how the children assigned referents, enriched semantic underdetermination, and recovered implicatures. It also became evident that even at the age of 5 years 6 months the children were in the process of becoming more skilled at integrating contextually complex inferences. It was further shown how children's selection of the appropriate context, given the focus of the question, depended on how relevance was achieved in that context.

摘要

相似文献

1
Use of context in question answering by 3-, 4- and 5-year-old children.
J Psycholinguist Res. 2003 Jul;32(4):397-415. doi: 10.1023/a:1024847529077.
2
Cognitive approach to assessing pragmatic language comprehension in children with specific language impairment.评估特定语言障碍儿童语用语言理解能力的认知方法。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2008 Jul-Aug;43(4):427-47. doi: 10.1080/13682820701633207.
3
Answering questions and explaining answers: a study of Finnish-speaking children.回答问题与解释答案:一项针对说芬兰语儿童的研究。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2008 May;37(3):219-41. doi: 10.1007/s10936-007-9067-6.
4
Scalar implicatures: experiments at the semantics-pragmatics interface.等级含义:语义学与语用学界面的实验
Cognition. 2003 Jan;86(3):253-82. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(02)00179-8.
5
Children's ability to answer different types of questions.儿童回答不同类型问题的能力。
J Child Lang. 2013 Mar;40(2):469-91. doi: 10.1017/S0305000912000050. Epub 2012 Mar 22.
6
Opposites attract: the role of predicate dimensionality in preschool children's processing of negations.异性相吸:谓语维度在学龄前儿童对否定句处理中的作用
J Child Lang. 2003 May;30(2):419-40.
7
Young children's idiom comprehension: trying to get the picture.幼儿对习语的理解:试图领会含义。
J Speech Hear Res. 1992 Jun;35(3):580-7. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3503.580.
8
One frog, two frog, red frog, blue frog: factors affecting children's syntactic choices in production and comprehension.一只青蛙,两只青蛙,红青蛙,蓝青蛙:影响儿童在语言产出和理解中句法选择的因素。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2000 Nov;29(6):597-626. doi: 10.1023/a:1026468209238.
9
Lexical and referential cues to sentence interpretation: an investigation of children's interpretations of ambiguous sentences.句子理解中的词汇和指代线索:儿童对歧义句理解的调查。
J Child Lang. 2005 Nov;32(4):855-76. doi: 10.1017/s0305000905007051.
10
Differentiating scalar implicature from exclusion inferences in language acquisition.在语言习得中区分标量蕴涵和排除推理。
J Child Lang. 2019 Jul;46(4):733-759. doi: 10.1017/S0305000919000096. Epub 2019 Apr 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Pragmatic Language Development: Analysis of Mapping Knowledge Domains on How Infants and Children Become Pragmatically Competent.实用语言发展:关于婴儿和儿童如何获得实用能力的知识领域映射分析。
Children (Basel). 2022 Sep 16;9(9):1407. doi: 10.3390/children9091407.
2
Why Pragmatics and Theory of Mind Do Not (Completely) Overlap.为何语用学与心理理论并不(完全)重叠。
Front Psychol. 2018 Aug 13;9:1453. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01453. eCollection 2018.
3
Pragmatic language development in language impaired and typically developing children: incorrect answers in context.

本文引用的文献

1
Relevance theory and pragmatic impairment.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 1999 Oct-Dec;34(4):367-90. doi: 10.1080/136828299247342.
2
Why pragmatic impairment? A case study in the comprehension of inferential meaning.
Eur J Disord Commun. 1997;32(2 Spec No):35-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-6984.1997.tb01623.x.
3
The young child's development of sentence comprehension: influence of event probability, nonverbal context, syntactic form, and strategies.
Child Dev. 1974 Sep;45(3):567-76.
4
Comprehension problems in children with specific language impairment: literal and inferential meaning.
J Speech Hear Res. 1992 Feb;35(1):119-29. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3501.119.
语言受损儿童和正常发育儿童的语用语言发展:语境中的错误回答
J Psycholinguist Res. 2014 Feb;43(1):45-58. doi: 10.1007/s10936-013-9238-6.
4
Answering questions and explaining answers: a study of Finnish-speaking children.回答问题与解释答案:一项针对说芬兰语儿童的研究。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2008 May;37(3):219-41. doi: 10.1007/s10936-007-9067-6.