Suppr超能文献

新生儿筛查中的瞬态诱发耳声发射

Click evoked otoacoustic emissions in neonatal screening.

作者信息

Stevens J C, Webb H D, Hutchinson J, Connell J, Smith M F, Buffin J T

机构信息

Department of Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK.

出版信息

Ear Hear. 1990 Apr;11(2):128-33. doi: 10.1097/00003446-199004000-00007.

Abstract

Seven hundred and twenty-three neonates under intensive care have been tested by evoked otoacoustic emissions (EOAE) and the auditory brain stem response (ABR) to investigate the use of EOAE as a test for hearing impairment. Three hundred and thirty-one have had follow-up tests to the age of at least 2 years. The EOAE test has been found to be practical and quick to perform. The proportion of NICU infants producing a recordable EOAE is 80%, and the sensitivity and selectivity to the ABR result in the period up to 3 months post due date is 93 and 84%, respectively. These figures are high enough and the reduction in time compared to ABR is sufficient for the EOAE to be considered as the primary screen. The follow-up data show mixed results with both false positives and false negatives present. The incidence of severe hearing impairment is close to that expected from retrospective studies at 2 in 331 (1 bilateral, 1 unilateral). Firm conclusions on the sensitivity of EOAE to long-term hearing impairment await the results from larger numbers of infants and further follow up data.

摘要

对723名重症监护新生儿进行了耳声发射(EOAE)和听性脑干反应(ABR)测试,以研究EOAE作为听力障碍检测方法的实用性。其中331名婴儿接受了至少到2岁的随访测试。结果发现,EOAE测试操作简便、快捷。在新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)中,能够记录到EOAE的婴儿比例为80%,在预产期后3个月内,EOAE对ABR结果的敏感性和特异性分别为93%和84%。这些数据足够高,且与ABR相比,检测时间的缩短足以使EOAE被视为主要筛查方法。随访数据显示结果不一,存在假阳性和假阴性情况。重度听力障碍的发生率接近回顾性研究预期,在331名婴儿中有2例(1例双侧,1例单侧)。关于EOAE对长期听力障碍敏感性的确切结论有待更多婴儿的测试结果和进一步的随访数据。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验