Reply to Goswami et al., Harihar et al., and Karanth et al.: Fine-scale interactions between tigers and people.
作者信息
Carter Neil H, Shrestha Binoj K, Karki Jhamak B, Pradhan Narendra Man Babu, Liu Jianguo
出版信息
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jan 8;110(2):E111-2. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1217414110.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Reply to Goswami et al., Harihar et al., and Karanth et al.: Fine-scale interactions between tigers and people.对戈斯瓦米等人、哈里哈尔等人以及卡兰斯等人的回应：老虎与人类之间的微观互动。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jan 8;110(2):E111-2. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1217414110.
2
Conflict of human-wildlife coexistence.人类与野生动物共存的冲突。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jan 8;110(2):E108. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1215758110. Epub 2013 Jan 2.
3
Conflating "co-occurrence" with "coexistence".将“同时出现”与“共存”混为一谈。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jan 8;110(2):E109. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1217001110. Epub 2013 Jan 2.
4
Sinks as saviors: why flawed inference cannot assist tiger recovery.作为救世主的困境：为何有缺陷的推断无助于老虎种群恢复。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jan 8;110(2):E110. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1216623110. Epub 2013 Jan 2.
5
Coexistence between wildlife and humans at fine spatial scales.野生动物与人类在精细空间尺度上的共存。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Sep 18;109(38):15360-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1210490109. Epub 2012 Sep 4.
6
Tiger conservation in the Year of the Tiger, 2010.2010年虎年的老虎保护工作。
Integr Zool. 2010 Dec;5(4):283-284. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4877.2010.00224.x.
7
Poaching laws are useless without solid enforcement.没有强有力的执法，偷猎法律就毫无用处。
Nature. 2007 Jan 11;445(7124):147. doi: 10.1038/445147b.
8
Tigers need cover: multi-scale occupancy study of the big cat in Sumatran forest and plantation landscapes.老虎需要掩护：苏门答腊森林和种植园景观中大猫的多尺度占有研究。
PLoS One. 2012;7(1):e30859. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030859. Epub 2012 Jan 23.
9
The world can't have wild tigers and eat them, too.世界不能既拥有野生老虎又吃掉它们。
Conserv Biol. 2008 Feb;22(1):222-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00802.x.
10
Doing conservation by numbers.通过数字进行保护。
Nature. 2006 Jul 6;442(7098):12. doi: 10.1038/442012a.
本文引用的文献
1
Conflict of human-wildlife coexistence.人类与野生动物共存的冲突。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jan 8;110(2):E108. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1215758110. Epub 2013 Jan 2.
2
Sinks as saviors: why flawed inference cannot assist tiger recovery.作为救世主的困境：为何有缺陷的推断无助于老虎种群恢复。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jan 8;110(2):E110. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1216623110. Epub 2013 Jan 2.
3
Conflating "co-occurrence" with "coexistence".将“同时出现”与“共存”混为一谈。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jan 8;110(2):E109. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1217001110. Epub 2013 Jan 2.
4
Coexistence between wildlife and humans at fine spatial scales.野生动物与人类在精细空间尺度上的共存。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Sep 18;109(38):15360-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1210490109. Epub 2012 Sep 4.
5
How does spatial study design influence density estimates from spatial capture-recapture models?空间研究设计如何影响空间捕获-再捕获模型的密度估计？
PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e34575. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034575. Epub 2012 Apr 23.
6
Hierarchical models for estimating density from DNA mark-recapture studies.用于从DNA标记重捕研究中估计密度的分层模型。
Ecology. 2009 Apr;90(4):1106-15. doi: 10.1890/07-2112.1.
Zotero 插件