Centre for International Health, University of Bergen, Postbox 7804, N-5009 Bergen, Norway.
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Mar;81:18-25. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.01.011. Epub 2013 Jan 22.
HIV-related stigma continues to be a prominent barrier to testing, treatment and care. However, few studies have investigated changes in stigma over time and the factors contributing to these changes, and there is no evidence of the impact of HIV testing and counselling on stigma. This study was nested within a pair-matched cluster-randomized trial on the acceptance of home-based voluntary HIV counselling and testing conducted in a rural district in Zambia between 2009 and 2011, and investigated changes in stigma over time and the impact of HIV testing and counselling on stigma. Data from a baseline survey (n = 1500) and a follow-up survey (n = 1107) were used to evaluate changes in stigma. There was an overall reduction of seven per cent in stigma from baseline to follow-up. This was mainly due to a reduction in individual stigmatizing attitudes but not in perceived stigma. The reduction did not differ between the trial arms (β = -0.22, p = 0.423). Being tested for HIV was associated with a reduction in stigma (β = -0.57, p = 0.030), and there was a trend towards home-based Voluntary Counselling and Testing having a larger impact on stigma than other testing approaches (β = -0.78, p = 0.080 vs. β = -0.37, p = 0.551), possibly explained by a strong focus on counselling and the safe environment of the home. The reduction observed in both arms may give reason to be optimistic as it may have consequences for disclosure, treatment access and adherence. Yet, the change in stigma may have been affected by social desirability bias, as extensive community mobilization was carried out in both arms. The study underscores the challenges in measuring and monitoring HIV-related stigma. Adjustment for social desirability bias and inclusion of qualitative methods are recommended for further studies on the impact of HIV testing on stigma.
HIV 相关耻辱感仍然是检测、治疗和护理的突出障碍。然而,很少有研究调查随着时间的推移耻辱感的变化以及导致这些变化的因素,也没有证据表明 HIV 检测和咨询对耻辱感有影响。本研究嵌套在 2009 年至 2011 年期间在赞比亚一个农村地区进行的一项基于家庭的自愿 HIV 咨询和检测接受情况的配对群组随机试验中,调查了随着时间的推移耻辱感的变化以及 HIV 检测和咨询对耻辱感的影响。本研究使用基线调查(n=1500)和随访调查(n=1107)的数据来评估耻辱感的变化。从基线到随访,耻辱感总体下降了 7%。这主要是由于个体污名化态度的减少,但感知耻辱感没有减少。试验组之间的减少没有差异(β=-0.22,p=0.423)。接受 HIV 检测与耻辱感的减少有关(β=-0.57,p=0.030),并且家庭自愿咨询和检测对耻辱感的影响可能大于其他检测方法(β=-0.78,p=0.080 与β=-0.37,p=0.551),这可能是由于对咨询的强烈关注和家庭的安全环境。两个试验组都观察到的减少可能是令人乐观的,因为这可能对披露、治疗机会和依从性产生影响。然而,耻辱感的变化可能受到社会期望偏差的影响,因为两个试验组都进行了广泛的社区动员。这项研究强调了衡量和监测 HIV 相关耻辱感的挑战。建议进一步研究 HIV 检测对耻辱感的影响时,应调整社会期望偏差并纳入定性方法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012-1-5
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015-7-17
BMC Public Health. 2010-6-17
South Afr J HIV Med. 2020-7-22