Department of Traumatology, Division of Surgery, John Hunter Hospital and University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Mar;74(3):780-4. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182826d5f.
INTRODUCTION: Trauma services throughout the world have had positive effects on trauma-related mortality. Australian trauma services are generally more consultative in nature rather than the North American model of full trauma admission service. We hypothesized that the introduction of a consultative specialist trauma service in a Level I Australian trauma center would reduce mortality of the severely injured. METHODS: A 10-year retrospective study (January 1, 2002-December 31, 2011) was performed on all trauma patients admitted with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) > 15. Patients were identified from the trauma registry, and data for age, sex, mechanism of injury, ISS, survival to discharge, and length of stay were collected. Mortality was examined for patients with severe injury (ISS > 15) and patients with critical injury (ISS > 24) and compared for the three periods: 2002-2004 (without trauma specialist), 2005-2007 (with trauma specialist), and 2008-2011 (with specialist trauma service). RESULTS: A total of 3,869 severely injured (ISS > 15) trauma patients were identified during the 10-year period. Of these, 2,826 (73%) were male, 1,513 (39%) were critically injured (ISS > 24), and more than 97% (3,754) were the victim of blunt trauma. Overall mortality decreased from 12.4% to 9.3% (relative risk, 0.75) from period one to period three and from 25.4% to 20.3% (relative risk, 0.80) for patients with critical injury. A 0.46% per year decrease (p = 0.018) in mortality was detected (odds ratio, 0.63; p < 0.001). For critically injured (ISS > 24), the trend was (0.61% per year; odds ratio, 0.68; p = 0.039). CONCLUSION: The introduction of a specialist trauma service decreased the mortality of patients with severe injury, the model of care should be considered to implement state- and nationwide in Australia. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Epidemiologic study, level III.
介绍:世界各地的创伤服务对与创伤相关的死亡率都产生了积极影响。澳大利亚的创伤服务通常更具咨询性质,而不是北美的全面创伤入院服务模式。我们假设在澳大利亚一级创伤中心引入咨询专科创伤服务将降低严重受伤患者的死亡率。
方法:对所有入院时损伤严重程度评分(ISS)> 15 的创伤患者进行了一项为期 10 年的回顾性研究(2002 年 1 月 1 日至 2011 年 12 月 31 日)。从创伤登记处确定患者,并收集年龄、性别、损伤机制、ISS、出院时存活率和住院时间的数据。检查了严重损伤(ISS> 15)和严重损伤(ISS> 24)患者的死亡率,并将其与三个时期进行比较:2002-2004 年(无创伤专家)、2005-2007 年(有创伤专家)和 2008-2011 年(有专科创伤服务)。
结果:在 10 年期间共确定了 3869 名严重受伤(ISS> 15)的创伤患者。其中,2826 名(73%)为男性,1513 名(39%)为严重受伤(ISS> 24),超过 97%(3754 名)为钝器伤受害者。总体死亡率从第一期到第三期从 12.4%降至 9.3%(相对风险,0.75),严重受伤患者从 25.4%降至 20.3%(相对风险,0.80)。死亡率每年下降 0.46%(p = 0.018)(优势比,0.63;p < 0.001)。对于严重受伤(ISS> 24),趋势为每年(0.61%;优势比,0.68;p = 0.039)。
结论:引入专科创伤服务降低了严重受伤患者的死亡率,应考虑在澳大利亚全国范围内实施这种护理模式。
证据水平:流行病学研究,III 级。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013-3
J Trauma. 2010-8
Injury. 2011-12-28
Adv Rehabil Sci Pract. 2025-1-16
OTA Int. 2023-9-1
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2018-6