Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Utrecht Trauma Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
JAMA Surg. 2018 Apr 1;153(4):322-327. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.4472.
A major component of trauma care is adequate prehospital triage. To optimize the prehospital triage system, it is essential to gain insight in the quality of prehospital triage of the entire trauma system.
To prospectively evaluate the quality of the field triage system to identify severely injured adult trauma patients.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prehospital and hospital data of all adult trauma patients during 2012 to 2014 transported with the highest priority by emergency medical services professionals to 10 hospitals in Central Netherlands were prospectively collected. Prehospital data collected by the emergency medical services professionals were matched to hospital data collected in the trauma registry. An Injury Severity Score of 16 or more was used to determine severe injury.
The quality and diagnostic accuracy of the field triage protocol and compliance of emergency medical services professionals to the protocol.
A total of 4950 trauma patients were evaluated of which 436 (8.8%) patients were severely injured. The undertriage rate based on actual destination facility was 21.6% (95% CI, 18.0-25.7) with an overtriage rate of 30.6% (95% CI, 29.3-32.0). Analysis of the protocol itself, regardless of destination facility, resulted in an undertriage of 63.8% (95% CI, 59.2-68.1) and overtriage of 7.4% (95% CI, 6.7-8.2). The compliance to the field triage trauma protocol was 73% for patients with a level 1 indication.
More than 20% of the patients with severe injuries were not transported to a level I trauma center. These patients are at risk for preventable morbidity and mortality. This finding indicates the need for improvement of the prehospital triage protocol.
创伤救治的一个主要组成部分是充分的院前分诊。为了优化院前分诊系统,了解整个创伤系统的院前分诊质量至关重要。
前瞻性评估现场分诊系统的质量,以确定严重受伤的成年创伤患者。
设计、地点和参与者:前瞻性收集了 2012 年至 2014 年期间,荷兰中部 10 家医院通过紧急医疗服务专业人员以最高优先级转运的所有成年创伤患者的院前和医院数据。紧急医疗服务专业人员收集的院前数据与创伤登记处收集的医院数据相匹配。使用损伤严重程度评分 16 分或以上来确定严重损伤。
现场分诊方案的质量和诊断准确性以及紧急医疗服务专业人员对方案的遵守情况。
共评估了 4950 名创伤患者,其中 436 名(8.8%)患者为严重受伤。根据实际目的地医疗机构的分诊不足率为 21.6%(95%CI,18.0-25.7),分诊过度率为 30.6%(95%CI,29.3-32.0)。分析协议本身,而不考虑目的地医疗机构,结果分诊不足率为 63.8%(95%CI,59.2-68.1),分诊过度率为 7.4%(95%CI,6.7-8.2)。对于有 1 级指征的患者,现场分诊创伤协议的依从率为 73%。
超过 20%的严重受伤患者未被转运至 1 级创伤中心。这些患者有发生可预防的发病率和死亡率的风险。这一发现表明需要改进院前分诊方案。