Suppr超能文献

院前分诊选择严重创伤患者的准确性。

Accuracy of Prehospital Triage in Selecting Severely Injured Trauma Patients.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Utrecht Trauma Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

出版信息

JAMA Surg. 2018 Apr 1;153(4):322-327. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.4472.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

A major component of trauma care is adequate prehospital triage. To optimize the prehospital triage system, it is essential to gain insight in the quality of prehospital triage of the entire trauma system.

OBJECTIVE

To prospectively evaluate the quality of the field triage system to identify severely injured adult trauma patients.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prehospital and hospital data of all adult trauma patients during 2012 to 2014 transported with the highest priority by emergency medical services professionals to 10 hospitals in Central Netherlands were prospectively collected. Prehospital data collected by the emergency medical services professionals were matched to hospital data collected in the trauma registry. An Injury Severity Score of 16 or more was used to determine severe injury.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The quality and diagnostic accuracy of the field triage protocol and compliance of emergency medical services professionals to the protocol.

RESULTS

A total of 4950 trauma patients were evaluated of which 436 (8.8%) patients were severely injured. The undertriage rate based on actual destination facility was 21.6% (95% CI, 18.0-25.7) with an overtriage rate of 30.6% (95% CI, 29.3-32.0). Analysis of the protocol itself, regardless of destination facility, resulted in an undertriage of 63.8% (95% CI, 59.2-68.1) and overtriage of 7.4% (95% CI, 6.7-8.2). The compliance to the field triage trauma protocol was 73% for patients with a level 1 indication.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

More than 20% of the patients with severe injuries were not transported to a level I trauma center. These patients are at risk for preventable morbidity and mortality. This finding indicates the need for improvement of the prehospital triage protocol.

摘要

重要性

创伤救治的一个主要组成部分是充分的院前分诊。为了优化院前分诊系统,了解整个创伤系统的院前分诊质量至关重要。

目的

前瞻性评估现场分诊系统的质量,以确定严重受伤的成年创伤患者。

设计、地点和参与者:前瞻性收集了 2012 年至 2014 年期间,荷兰中部 10 家医院通过紧急医疗服务专业人员以最高优先级转运的所有成年创伤患者的院前和医院数据。紧急医疗服务专业人员收集的院前数据与创伤登记处收集的医院数据相匹配。使用损伤严重程度评分 16 分或以上来确定严重损伤。

主要结果和测量

现场分诊方案的质量和诊断准确性以及紧急医疗服务专业人员对方案的遵守情况。

结果

共评估了 4950 名创伤患者,其中 436 名(8.8%)患者为严重受伤。根据实际目的地医疗机构的分诊不足率为 21.6%(95%CI,18.0-25.7),分诊过度率为 30.6%(95%CI,29.3-32.0)。分析协议本身,而不考虑目的地医疗机构,结果分诊不足率为 63.8%(95%CI,59.2-68.1),分诊过度率为 7.4%(95%CI,6.7-8.2)。对于有 1 级指征的患者,现场分诊创伤协议的依从率为 73%。

结论和相关性

超过 20%的严重受伤患者未被转运至 1 级创伤中心。这些患者有发生可预防的发病率和死亡率的风险。这一发现表明需要改进院前分诊方案。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

4
A Systematic Literature Review of Trauma Systems: An Operations Management Perspective.创伤系统的系统文献综述:运营管理视角
Adv Rehabil Sci Pract. 2025 Jan 16;14:27536351241310645. doi: 10.1177/27536351241310645. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.

本文引用的文献

4
Undertriage of major trauma patients in the US emergency departments.美国急诊科对重大创伤患者的分诊不足。
Am J Emerg Med. 2014 Sep;32(9):997-1004. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2014.05.038. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
5
Physiologic field triage criteria for identifying seriously injured older adults.用于识别严重受伤老年人的生理现场分诊标准。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2014 Oct-Dec;18(4):461-70. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2014.912707. Epub 2014 Jun 16.
8
The impact of specialist trauma service on major trauma mortality.专科创伤服务对严重创伤死亡率的影响。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Mar;74(3):780-4. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182826d5f.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验