评论：Chari, R.; Burke, T.A.; White, R.H.; Fox, M.A. 将易感性纳入环境政策：对国家环境空气质量标准中铅的分析。国际环境研究与公共卫生杂志 2012, 9, 1077-1096.
Comments on: Chari, R.; Burke, T.A.; White, R.H.; Fox, M.A. Integrating susceptibility into environmental policy: an analysis of the national ambient air quality standard for lead. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2012, 9, 1077-1096.
机构信息
Gradient, 20 University Road, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
出版信息
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013 Feb 21;10(2):742-6. doi: 10.3390/ijerph10020742.
Abstract
A recent publication in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health by Chari et al. [1] provides no basis for changing the National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for lead in the U.S. to protect children in low socio-economic (SES) populations. The studies selected by Chari et al. for analysis do not provide comparable information on regression coefficients for the blood lead level-IQ relationship. The coefficients differ from one another more on the basis of unequal blood lead metrics, ages of blood lead measurement, and differences in covariate adjustments and standardization, than the difference postulated by Chari et al. to correspond to low vs. high SES populations.
摘要
查里等人最近在《国际环境研究与公共卫生杂志》上发表的一篇文章[1]，没有为修改美国保护低收入社会经济群体（SES）儿童的铅的国家环境空气质量标准（NAAQS）提供依据。查里等人选择进行分析的研究并未提供关于血铅水平与智商关系的回归系数的可比信息。这些系数之间的差异更多地是基于血铅测量指标、血铅测量年龄以及协变量调整和标准化的差异，而不是查里等人假设的对应于低 SES 和高 SES 人群的差异。
相似文献
1
Comments on: Chari, R.; Burke, T.A.; White, R.H.; Fox, M.A. Integrating susceptibility into environmental policy: an analysis of the national ambient air quality standard for lead. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2012, 9, 1077-1096.评论：Chari, R.; Burke, T.A.; White, R.H.; Fox, M.A. 将易感性纳入环境政策：对国家环境空气质量标准中铅的分析。国际环境研究与公共卫生杂志 2012, 9, 1077-1096.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013 Feb 21;10(2):742-6. doi: 10.3390/ijerph10020742.
2
Comments on: Chari, R.; Burke, T.A.; White, R.H.; Fox, M.A. Integrating Susceptibility into environmental policy: an analysis of the national ambient air quality standard for lead. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2012, 9, 1077-1096.评 Chari, R.; Burke, T.A.; White, R.H.; Fox, M.A.：将易感性纳入环境政策：对国家空气质量标准中的铅的分析。《国际环境研究与公共卫生杂志》2012, 9, 1077-1096。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013 Feb 8;10(2):712-6. doi: 10.3390/ijerph10020712.
3
Integrating susceptibility into environmental policy: an analysis of the national ambient air quality standard for lead.将易感性纳入环境政策：对国家环境空气质量标准中铅的分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2012 Apr;9(4):1077-96. doi: 10.3390/ijerph9041077. Epub 2012 Mar 27.
4
Analysis of primary fine particle national ambient air quality standard metrics.国家环境空气质量一级细颗粒物标准指标分析。
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2006 Feb;56(2):206-18. doi: 10.1080/10473289.2006.10464447.
5
What's wrong with the National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for fine particulate matter (PM2.5)?细颗粒物（PM2.5）的国家环境空气质量标准（NAAQS）怎么了？
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2003 Jun;37(3):411; author reply 412. doi: 10.1016/s0273-2300(03)00021-7.
6
Providing Context for Ambient Particulate Matter and Estimates of Attributable Mortality.为大气颗粒物提供背景信息和归因死亡率的估算。
Risk Anal. 2016 Sep;36(9):1755-65. doi: 10.1111/risa.12674. Epub 2016 Sep 15.
7
An evaluation of the robustness of the visual air quality "preference study" method.评估视觉空气质量“偏好研究”方法的稳健性。
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2013 Apr;63(4):405-17. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2012.759165.
8
Setting Air Quality Standards for PM : A Role for Subjective Uncertainty in NAAQS Quantitative Risk Assessments?设定 PM 的空气质量标准：主观不确定性在 NAAQS 定量风险评估中是否有作用？
Risk Anal. 2018 Nov;38(11):2318-2339. doi: 10.1111/risa.13174. Epub 2018 Aug 28.
9
Are the elements of the proposed ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards informed by the best available science?拟议的臭氧国家环境空气质量标准的各项要素是否依据现有最佳科学知识制定？
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2015 Jun;72(1):134-40. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.04.001. Epub 2015 Apr 6.
10
Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.回复拉赫曼·希里博士的来信：职业群体中的自杀这一具有挑战性的话题。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2018 Jan 1;44(1):108-110. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3698. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
本文引用的文献
1
Integrating susceptibility into environmental policy: an analysis of the national ambient air quality standard for lead.将易感性纳入环境政策：对国家环境空气质量标准中铅的分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2012 Apr;9(4):1077-96. doi: 10.3390/ijerph9041077. Epub 2012 Mar 27.
2
Lead neurotoxicity and socioeconomic status: conceptual and analytical issues.铅神经毒性与社会经济地位：概念与分析问题
Neurotoxicology. 2008 Sep;29(5):828-32. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2008.04.005. Epub 2008 Apr 22.
3
Low-level environmental lead exposure and children's intellectual function: an international pooled analysis.低水平环境铅暴露与儿童智力功能：一项国际汇总分析。
Environ Health Perspect. 2005 Jul;113(7):894-9. doi: 10.1289/ehp.7688.
4
Interactions between environmental lead exposure and sociodemographic factors on cognitive development.环境铅暴露与社会人口学因素对认知发展的相互作用。
Arch Environ Health. 2000 Sep-Oct;55(5):330-5. doi: 10.1080/00039890009604025.
5
Blood lead, behaviour and intelligence test performance in preschool children.学龄前儿童的血铅水平、行为及智力测试表现
Sci Total Environ. 1984 Dec;40:45-60. doi: 10.1016/0048-9697(84)90341-3.
6
Low-level fetal lead exposure effect on neurobehavioral development in early infancy.低水平胎儿铅暴露对婴儿早期神经行为发育的影响。
Pediatrics. 1987 Nov;80(5):721-30.
7
Sociodemographic factors modifying the effect of environmental lead on neuropsychological development in early childhood.社会人口学因素对环境铅暴露影响幼儿神经心理发育的作用修饰
Neurotoxicol Teratol. 1992 Sep-Oct;14(5):321-7. doi: 10.1016/0892-0362(92)90038-c.
Zotero 插件