Department of Psychiatry, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Brazil.
Braz J Psychiatry. 2012 Dec;34(4):434-9. doi: 10.1016/j.rbp.2012.05.006.
The main aim of this study is to review the agenda for research priorities of mental health in Brazil.
The first step was to gather 28 experts (22 researchers, five policy makers, and the coordinator) representing all mental health fields from different geographical areas of the country. Participants were asked to list what they considered to be the most relevant mental health research questions for the country to address in the next 10 years. Seventeen participants answered this question; after redundancies were excluded, a total of 110 responses were collected. As the second step, participants were asked to rank which questions were the 35 most significant. The final step was to score 15 items for each of the 35 selected questions to determine whether it would be a) answerable, b) effective, c) deliverable, d) equitable, and e) effective at reducing the burden of mental health. The ten highest ranked questions were then selected.
There were four questions addressing primary care with respect to a) the effectiveness of interventions, b) "matrix support", c) comparisons of different models of stepped care, and d) interventions to enhance identification and treatment of common mental disorders at the Family Health Program. The other questions were related to the evaluation of mental health services for adults and children/adolescents to clarify barriers to treatment in primary care, drug addiction, and severe mental disorders; to investigate the cost-benefit relationship of anti-psychotics; to design interventions to decrease alcohol consumption; and to apply new technologies (telemedicine) for education and supervision of non-specialists.
This priority-setting research exercise highlighted a need for implementing investments at the primary-care level, particularly in the family health program; the urgent need to evaluate services; and policies to improve equity by increasing accessibility to services and testing interventions to reduce barriers for seeking mental health treatment.
本研究的主要目的是审查巴西精神卫生研究重点的议程。
第一步是召集 28 名专家(22 名研究人员、5 名政策制定者和协调员),代表来自该国不同地理区域的所有精神卫生领域。要求参与者列出他们认为该国在未来 10 年内需要解决的最相关的精神卫生研究问题。有 17 名参与者回答了这个问题;在排除冗余后,共收集到 110 条回复。作为第二步,要求参与者对哪些问题是最重要的前 35 个问题进行排名。第三步是为 35 个选定问题中的每一个问题分配 15 分,以确定它是否 a)可回答,b)有效,c)可交付,d)公平,以及 e)是否能有效减轻精神卫生负担。然后选择排名前十的问题。
有四个问题涉及初级保健,涉及干预措施的有效性、“矩阵支持”、不同的阶梯式护理模式的比较,以及加强家庭健康计划中常见精神障碍的识别和治疗的干预措施。其他问题与评估成人和儿童/青少年的精神卫生服务有关,以阐明初级保健中治疗障碍、药物成瘾和严重精神障碍;研究抗精神病药物的成本效益关系;设计干预措施以减少酒精消费;并应用新技术(远程医疗)对非专家进行教育和监督。
这项重点制定研究工作强调了在初级保健,特别是在家庭健康计划中实施投资的必要性;迫切需要评估服务;以及通过增加服务的可及性和测试减少寻求精神卫生治疗障碍的干预措施来改善公平性的政策。