Department of Biotechnology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna, 1180 Vienna, Austria.
Biotechnol J. 2013 Jun;8(6):655-70. doi: 10.1002/biot.201200018. Epub 2013 Feb 22.
The analysis of host cell proteins (HCPs) is one of the most important analytical requirements during bioprocess development of therapeutic moieties. In this review, we focus on the comparison of different methods for the analysis of HCPs and how cell lines, fermentation conditions, and unit operations influence HCP distribution during the process chain. Current guidelines typically require reduction of HCPs to the ppm level, depending on the intended use, the route of administration of the product, and the production system. A range of immunospecific and non-specific methods are available that have been globally accepted by regulatory bodies. Immunospecific methods, such as ELISA, are simple to use in routine analysis and can quantify low levels of HCPs when specific antibodies are available. Non-specific methods are more complex; however, they provide a holistic view of the HCP profile and qualitative information of the composition of HCP in the sample. Different methods for the comparison of bioprocessing strategies during scale-up and purification development are compared herein. The methods include immunospecific methods, such as ELISA, western blot, and threshold, and non-specific methods, such as 2D-DIGE and 2D-HPLC combined with MS.
宿主细胞蛋白(HCP)分析是治疗性分子生物工艺开发过程中最重要的分析要求之一。在这篇综述中,我们重点比较了不同分析 HCP 的方法,以及细胞系、发酵条件和单元操作如何在工艺链中影响 HCP 的分布。目前的指南通常要求根据产品的预期用途、给药途径和生产系统,将 HCP 减少到 ppm 水平。有一系列免疫特异性和非特异性方法已被全球监管机构接受。免疫特异性方法,如 ELISA,在常规分析中使用简单,并且当有特定的抗体时可以定量低水平的 HCP。非特异性方法比较复杂;然而,它们提供了 HCP 组成的整体视图和定性信息。本文比较了在放大和纯化开发过程中比较生物工艺策略的不同方法。这些方法包括免疫特异性方法,如 ELISA、western blot 和阈值,以及非特异性方法,如 2D-DIGE 和 2D-HPLC 结合 MS。