• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用累积和技术对食管切除术进行实时结果监测。

Real-time outcome monitoring following oesophagectomy using cumulative sum techniques.

机构信息

Geoffrey Roberts, Cheuk-Bong Tang, Mike Harvey, Sritharan Kadirkamanathan, Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Broomfield Hospital, Chelmsford CM1 7ET, United Kingdom.

出版信息

World J Gastrointest Surg. 2012 Oct 27;4(10):234-7. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v4.i10.234.

DOI:10.4240/wjgs.v4.i10.234
PMID:23443533
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3582162/
Abstract

AIM

To examine the feasibility of prospective, real-time outcome monitoring in a United Kingdom oesophago-gastric cancer surgery unit.

METHODS

The first 100 hybrid (laparoscopic abdominal phase, open thoracic phase) Ivor-Lewis oesophagectomies performed by a United Kingdom oesophago-gastric cancer surgery unit were assessed retrospectively using cumulative sum (CUSUM) techniques. The monitored outcome was 30-d post-operative mortality, with the accepted mortality risk defined as 5%. A variable life adjusted display (VLAD) was constructed by plotting a graph of cumulative mortality minus cumulative mortality risk on the y axis vs sequential case number on the x axis. This was modified to a zeroed VLAD by preventing the plot from crossing the y = 0 axis - essentially creating two plots, one examining trends where cumulative mortality was higher than mortality risk (i.e., worse than expected outcomes) where y > 0, and vice versa. Alert lines were set at y = ± 2. At any point where a plot breaches an alert line, it is felt that the 30-d post-operative mortality rate has deviated significantly from that expected and an internal review should be performed.

RESULTS

One hundred cases were assessed, with a mean age of 66.4 years, mean T stage of 2.1, and mean N stage of 0.48. Three cases were commenced using a laparoscopic technique and converted to open surgery due to technical factors. Median length of inpatient stay was 15 d. The crude 30 d mortality was 5% and the incidence of clinically significant anastomotic leak was 6%. The VLAD demonstrated a plot of cumulative mortality minus cumulative mortality risk (i.e., 5% per case) which remained in the range -1.4 to +0.5 excess mortalities. With the alert set at two greater or fewer than predicted mortalities, this method does not approach the point of triggering internal review. It is however arguable that a run of performance that is better than expected, causing the plot to be well below y = 0, would mask a subsequent run of poor performance by requiring a rise of greater than two excess mortalities to trigger the alert line. The zeroed VLAD removes this problem by preventing the plot that is examining above expected mortality from passing below y = 0, and vice versa. In this study period, no audit triggers were reached. It is therefore possible to independently assess runs of good, or poor performance and so target internal audit to the appropriate series of cases. It is important to note this technique allows targeted internal review, in response to both above and below average outcomes. This study has demonstrated the feasibility of prospective outcome monitoring using the above techniques, actual real-time implementation has the potential to pick up and reinforce good practices when performance is better than predicted, and provide an early warning system for when performance falls below that predicted. Further development is possible, including more patient specific risk adjustment using the oesophago-gastric surgery physiological and operative severity score for the enumeration of mortality and morbidity score.

CONCLUSION

CUSUM techniques provide a potential method of prospective, real-time outcome monitoring in oesophageal cancer surgery.

摘要

目的

检验英国胃食管交界癌外科手术单位前瞻性实时结果监测的可行性。

方法

采用累积和(CUSUM)技术回顾性评估英国胃食管交界癌外科手术单位完成的前 100 例杂交(腹腔镜腹部阶段、开放胸部阶段)Ivor-Lewis 食管切除术。监测的结果是 30 天术后死亡率,接受的死亡率风险定义为 5%。通过绘制累积死亡率减去累积死亡率风险在 y 轴上减去序贯病例数在 x 轴上的图形来构建可变生命调整显示(VLAD)。通过防止图穿过 y = 0 轴来修改为零 VLAD - 本质上创建了两个图,一个检查累积死亡率高于死亡率风险(即,结果比预期差)的趋势(即,y > 0),反之亦然。在 y = ± 2 处设置警报线。在任何一个图突破警报线的情况下,人们认为 30 天术后死亡率已经显著偏离预期,应进行内部审查。

结果

评估了 100 例病例,平均年龄为 66.4 岁,平均 T 分期为 2.1,平均 N 分期为 0.48。由于技术因素,有 3 例开始采用腹腔镜技术,然后转为开放手术。住院中位数为 15 天。粗死亡率为 5%,临床显著吻合口漏发生率为 6%。VLAD 显示了累积死亡率减去累积死亡率风险(即每例 5%)的图,该图仍在-1.4 至+0.5 个额外死亡率范围内。将警报设置为两个或更少的预测死亡率,这种方法不会接近触发内部审查的点。然而,可以争辩的是,表现优于预期的运行会导致图远低于 y = 0,从而掩盖随后表现不佳的运行,因为需要超过两个额外的死亡率上升才能触发警报线。零 VLAD 通过防止检查预期以上死亡率的图穿过 y = 0 来解决这个问题,反之亦然。在本研究期间,没有达到审核触发点。因此,可以独立评估表现良好或不佳的运行情况,从而将内部审核目标对准适当的病例系列。重要的是要注意,这种技术允许针对平均以上和以下的结果进行有针对性的内部审查。本研究证明了使用上述技术进行前瞻性结果监测的可行性,实际实时实施有可能在表现优于预期时发现并加强良好实践,并在表现低于预期时提供早期预警系统。进一步的发展是可能的,包括使用食管胃生理和手术严重程度评分对患者进行更具体的风险调整,以评估死亡率和发病率评分。

结论

CUSUM 技术为食管癌手术的前瞻性实时结果监测提供了一种潜在方法。

相似文献

1
Real-time outcome monitoring following oesophagectomy using cumulative sum techniques.使用累积和技术对食管切除术进行实时结果监测。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2012 Oct 27;4(10):234-7. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v4.i10.234.
2
Cumulative risk adjusted monitoring of 30-day mortality after cardiothoracic transplantation: UK experience.心胸移植术后30天死亡率的累积风险调整监测:英国经验。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005 Jun;27(6):1022-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2005.02.033. Epub 2005 Apr 8.
3
Development and implementation of prospective outcome monitoring in a regional burns service using cumulative sum (CUSUM) techniques.应用累积和(CUSUM)技术在区域性烧伤服务中开发和实施前瞻性结局监测。
Burns. 2013 Jun;39(4):571-6. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2012.10.018. Epub 2012 Dec 28.
4
Total thoracic oesophagectomy for oesophageal carcinoma: has it been worth it?食管癌全胸段食管切除术:这值得吗?
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1999 Sep;16(3):261-5. doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(99)00223-7.
5
A simple signaling rule for variable life-adjusted display derived from an equivalent risk-adjusted CUSUM chart.一种源自等效风险调整 CUSUM 图的变量生命调整显示的简单信号规则。
Stat Med. 2018 Jul 20;37(16):2455-2473. doi: 10.1002/sim.7647. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
6
Monitoring the results of cardiac surgery by variable life-adjusted display.通过可变寿命调整显示监测心脏手术结果。
Lancet. 1997 Oct 18;350(9085):1128-30. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)06507-0.
7
Monitoring the quality of cardiac surgery based on three or more surgical outcomes using a new variable life-adjusted display.使用一种新的可变寿命调整显示法,基于三种或更多手术结果监测心脏手术质量。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2017 Jun 1;29(3):427-432. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzx033.
8
Application of Variable Life Adjusted Display (VLAD) to risk-adjusted mortality of esophagogastric cancer surgery.可变生命调整显示(VLAD)在胃食管交界癌手术风险调整死亡率中的应用。
World J Surg. 2012 Jan;36(1):104-8. doi: 10.1007/s00268-011-1303-4.
9
Application of Variable Life Adjusted Displays (VLAD) on Victorian Admitted Episodes Dataset (VAED).VLAD 在维多利亚州入院病例数据集(VAED)中的应用。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Aug 28;12:278. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-278.
10
Variable life-adjusted display (VLAD) for hip fracture patients: a prospective trial.髋部骨折患者的可变寿命调整显示(VLAD):一项前瞻性试验。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2015 Aug;25(6):1047-50. doi: 10.1007/s00590-015-1620-7. Epub 2015 Mar 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Critical Care Occupancy and Outcomes of Critically Ill Patients during the 2020 COVID-19 Winter Surge and 2009 H1N1 Influenza Pandemic in Australia.澳大利亚2020年新冠疫情冬季高峰与2009年甲型H1N1流感大流行期间重症监护病房占用情况及危重症患者结局的比较
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2021 Aug;18(8):1380-1389. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202010-1311OC.
2
Debate: should we use variable adjusted life displays (VLAD) to identify variations in performance in general surgery?辩论:我们是否应该使用可变调整生命显示器(VLAD)来识别普通外科手术中的表现差异?
BMC Surg. 2015 Aug 28;15:102. doi: 10.1186/s12893-015-0087-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Checklists change communication about key elements of patient care.清单改变了对患者护理关键要素的沟通方式。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Aug;73(2 Suppl 1):S75-82. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182606239.
2
Implementing a surgical checklist: more than checking a box.实施手术清单:不仅仅是勾选框。
Surgery. 2012 Sep;152(3):331-6. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2012.05.034. Epub 2012 Jul 6.
3
A 10-step intraoperative surgical checklist (ISC) for laparoscopic cholecystectomy-can it really reduce conversion rates to open cholecystectomy?腹腔镜胆囊切除术的 10 步术中手术清单(ISC)-真的能降低中转开腹率吗?
J Gastrointest Surg. 2012 Jul;16(7):1318-23. doi: 10.1007/s11605-012-1886-6. Epub 2012 Apr 20.
4
Development of an adhesive surgical ward round checklist: a technique to improve patient safety.一份外科病房巡回粘贴式检查表的开发:一种提高患者安全的技术。
Ir Med J. 2011 Nov-Dec;104(10):303-5.
5
Surgical time out checklist with debriefing and multidisciplinary feedback improves venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in thoracic surgery: a prospective audit.手术暂停检查表与汇报和多学科反馈可改善胸外科的静脉血栓栓塞预防:一项前瞻性审核。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012 Jun;41(6):1326-9. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezr179. Epub 2011 Dec 26.
6
Development and evaluation of a checklist to support decision making in cancer multidisciplinary team meetings: MDT-QuIC.制定并评估一份检查表以支持癌症多学科团队会议中的决策:MDT-QuIC。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Jun;19(6):1759-65. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-2187-0. Epub 2011 Dec 30.
7
Effects of the introduction of the WHO "Surgical Safety Checklist" on in-hospital mortality: a cohort study.WHO“手术安全检查表”引入对院内死亡率的影响:一项队列研究。
Ann Surg. 2012 Jan;255(1):44-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31823779ae.
8
Learning curve for robot-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.机器人辅助 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术的学习曲线。
Surg Endosc. 2012 Apr;26(4):1116-21. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-2008-3. Epub 2011 Nov 2.
9
Control chart methods for monitoring surgical performance: a case study from gastro-oesophageal surgery.控制图法在监测手术绩效中的应用:来自胃肠手术的案例研究。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011 Jun;37(6):473-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2010.10.008. Epub 2010 Dec 31.
10
Cumulative summation graphs are a useful tool for monitoring positive surgical margin rates in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.累积和图是监测机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术阳性切缘率的有用工具。
BJU Int. 2011 May;107(10):1648-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09634.x. Epub 2010 Sep 29.