Suppr超能文献

当直接的医疗保健专业人员的沟通对不适当和不安全的药物使用产生影响时。

When direct health-care professional communications have an impact on inappropriate and unsafe use of medicines.

机构信息

Department of Marketing, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2013 Apr;93(4):360-5. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2012.262. Epub 2012 Dec 27.

Abstract

Serious safety issues relating to drugs are communicated to health-care professionals via Direct Health-Care Professional Communications (DHPCs). We explored which characteristics determined the impact of DHPCs issued in the Netherlands for ambulatory-care drugs (2001-2008). With multiple linear regression, we examined the impact on the relative change in new drug use post-DHPC of the following: time to DHPC, trend in use, degree of innovation, specialist drug, first/repeated DHPC, DHPC template, and type of safety issue. DHPCs have less impact on use of specialist drugs than nonspecialist drugs (P < 0.05). The DHPCs' impact increased after availability of a template emphasizing the main problem (P < 0.05), and for safety issues with a risk of death and/or disability (both P < 0.05) (adjusted R² = 0.392). Risk communication can be effective, specifically in case of well-structured information, and very serious safety issues. Effectiveness may improve by tailoring DHPCs and adding other communication channels, for example for drugs that are increasingly being used.

摘要

与药物相关的严重安全问题通过直接医疗保健专业人员通讯(DHPC)传达给医疗保健专业人员。我们探讨了哪些特征决定了荷兰为门诊药物(2001-2008 年)发布的 DHPC 的影响。我们使用多元线性回归,研究了以下因素对 DHPC 后新药使用的相对变化的影响:DHPC 时间、使用趋势、创新程度、专科药物、首次/重复 DHPC、DHPC 模板以及安全问题类型。DHPC 对专科药物的使用影响小于非专科药物(P < 0.05)。在提供强调主要问题的模板后,DHPC 的影响增加(P < 0.05),并且对于具有死亡和/或残疾风险的安全问题也是如此(均 P < 0.05)(调整后的 R²=0.392)。风险沟通可以是有效的,特别是在信息结构良好且安全问题非常严重的情况下。通过定制 DHPC 并添加其他沟通渠道,例如对于越来越多地使用的药物,可能会提高有效性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验