Suppr超能文献

在常规实践中,三联测试作为对单侧冷刺激试验无力的预测性筛查。

Triple test as predictive screen for unilateral weakness on caloric testing in routine practice.

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11, Regensburg, Germany.

出版信息

Otol Neurotol. 2013 Feb;34(2):297-303. doi: 10.1097/mao.0b013e31827d0901.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate in vertigo patients in routine practice to what extent a rapid and straightforward triple bedside test (spontaneous nystagmus, head-shaking nystagmus, and the head impulse test) can predict a normal result on caloric testing.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, single-blind, diagnostic study.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

151 patients (78 male and 73 female subjects; mean age, 52.5 +/- 16.4 yr) presenting with acute or recent symptoms of vertigo.

INTERVENTION

Diagnostic evaluation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The negative predictive value (NPV) of the triple test in relation to a normal caloric test response.

RESULTS

In unilateral weakness (UW) on caloric testing (UW, >=25%), the triple test had sensitivity of 63.6%, specificity of 85.4%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 71.4%, and an NPV of 80.4%. In other words, 80.4% of patients with a negative triple test also had a normal response on caloric testing. In pronounced canal paresis (UW, >=50%), the triple test had sensitivity of 81.8%, specificity of 81.4%, a PPV of 55.1%, and an NPV of 94.1%. Significant differences were found between 2 subgroups assessed by examiners with differing levels of experience (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The triple test represents a good screening tool that quickly and reliably excludes unilateral weakness and in particular pronounced canal paresis on caloric testing.

摘要

目的

在常规实践中调查眩晕患者,快速而直接的三 bedside 测试(自发性眼球震颤、摇头眼球震颤和眼球脉冲试验)在多大程度上可以预测热刺激试验的正常结果。

研究设计

前瞻性、单盲、诊断研究。

地点

三级转诊中心。

患者

151 名患者(78 名男性和 73 名女性;平均年龄,52.5 +/- 16.4 岁)出现急性或近期眩晕症状。

干预

诊断评估。

主要观察指标

三 test 在正常热刺激试验反应方面的阴性预测值(NPV)。

结果

在单侧减弱(UW)的热刺激试验中(UW,>=25%),三 test 的敏感性为 63.6%,特异性为 85.4%,阳性预测值(PPV)为 71.4%,阴性预测值(NPV)为 80.4%。换句话说,80.4%的三 test 阴性患者也有正常的热刺激试验反应。在明显的管腔麻痹(UW,>=50%)中,三 test 的敏感性为 81.8%,特异性为 81.4%,PPV 为 55.1%,NPV 为 94.1%。具有不同经验水平的检查者评估的 2 个亚组之间存在显著差异(p < 0.05)。

结论

三 test 是一种很好的筛选工具,可以快速可靠地排除单侧减弱,特别是热刺激试验中明显的管腔麻痹。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验