• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

坦桑尼亚的计划生育服务提供情况:公共设施与私人设施的比较分析

Provision of family planning services in Tanzania: a comparative analysis of public and private facilities.

作者信息

Kakoko Deodatus C, Ketting Evert, Kamazima Switbert R, Ruben Ruerd

机构信息

Department of Behavioural Sciences, School of Public Health and Social Sciences, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Tanzania.

出版信息

Afr J Reprod Health. 2012 Dec;16(4):140-8.

PMID:23444551
Abstract

Adherence to the policy guidelines and standards is necessary for family planning services. We compared public and private facilities in terms of provision of family planning services. We analyzed data from health facility questionnaire of the 2006 Tanzania Service Provision Assessment survey, based on 529 health facilities. Majority of public facilities (95.4%) offered family planning services, whereas more than half of private facilities (52.1%) did not offer those. Public facilities were more likely to offer modern contraceptives as compared to private facilities. However, private facilities were more likely to offer counseling on natural methods of family planning [AOR = 2.12 (1.15-3.92), P < or = 0.001]. Public facilities were more likely to report having guidelines or protocols for family planning services and various kinds of visual aids for family planning and STIs when compared to private facilities. This comparative analysis entails the need to enforce the standards of family planning services in Tanzania.

摘要

遵守政策指南和标准对于计划生育服务至关重要。我们比较了公立和私立机构在提供计划生育服务方面的情况。我们分析了2006年坦桑尼亚服务提供评估调查中医疗机构问卷的数据,该调查基于529家医疗机构。大多数公立机构(95.4%)提供计划生育服务,而超过一半的私立机构(52.1%)不提供这些服务。与私立机构相比,公立机构更有可能提供现代避孕方法。然而,私立机构更有可能提供关于计划生育自然方法的咨询服务 [调整后比值比 = 2.12(1.15 - 3.92),P ≤ 0.001]。与私立机构相比,公立机构更有可能报告拥有计划生育服务的指南或方案以及各种计划生育和性传播感染的视觉辅助工具。这种比较分析表明有必要在坦桑尼亚加强计划生育服务标准。

相似文献

1
Provision of family planning services in Tanzania: a comparative analysis of public and private facilities.坦桑尼亚的计划生育服务提供情况:公共设施与私人设施的比较分析
Afr J Reprod Health. 2012 Dec;16(4):140-8.
2
Measuring client satisfaction and the quality of family planning services: a comparative analysis of public and private health facilities in Tanzania, Kenya and Ghana.衡量客户满意度和计划生育服务质量:坦桑尼亚、肯尼亚和加纳公私卫生机构的比较分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Aug 24;11:203. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-203.
3
The quality of family planning services and client satisfaction in the public and private sectors in Kenya.肯尼亚公共部门和私营部门的计划生育服务质量与客户满意度
Int J Qual Health Care. 2009 Apr;21(2):87-96. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzp002. Epub 2009 Feb 3.
4
Capabilities of public, voluntary and private dispensaries in basic health service provision.公立、志愿性及私立诊疗所在提供基本医疗服务方面的能力。
World Health Forum. 1996;17(3):257-60.
5
Quality standards in provision of facility based HIV care and treatment: a case study from Dar es Salaam Region, Tanzania.基于设施的艾滋病毒护理和治疗服务的质量标准:坦桑尼亚达累斯萨拉姆地区的案例研究
East Afr J Public Health. 2007 Apr;4(1):12-8.
6
Disparities in access to family planning services in Jamaica.牙买加在获得计划生育服务方面的差异。
West Indian Med J. 1996 Mar;45(1):18-21.
7
Public or private providers? U.S. women's use of reproductive health services.公立还是私立医疗机构?美国女性对生殖健康服务的利用情况。
Fam Plann Perspect. 2001 Jan-Feb;33(1):4-12.
8
Commercial sector can improve access.商业部门可以改善获取途径。
Netw Res Triangle Park N C. 1998 Winter;18(2):12-5.
9
Using situation analysis data to assess the functioning of family planning clinics in Nigeria, Tanzania, and Zimbabwe.利用情况分析数据评估尼日利亚、坦桑尼亚和津巴布韦计划生育诊所的运作情况。
Stud Fam Plann. 1994 Jan-Feb;25(1):18-31.
10
Client satisfaction with family planning services in the area of high unmet need: evidence from Tanzania Service Provision Assessment Survey, 2014-2015.高未满足需求地区计划生育服务的客户满意度:来自坦桑尼亚服务提供情况评估调查的证据,2014-2015 年。
Reprod Health. 2018 Jul 16;15(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s12978-018-0566-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the readiness of health facilities to provide family planning services in low-resource settings: Insights from nationally representative service provision assessment surveys in 10 Countries.评估卫生设施在资源匮乏环境下提供计划生育服务的准备情况:10 个国家的全国代表性服务提供情况评估调查结果。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 16;18(11):e0290094. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290094. eCollection 2023.
2
Health Facility Readiness for Promoting Male Involvement in Family Planning Services in Tanzania: A Qualitative Study on Perspectives of Health Providers in Kibaha District.坦桑尼亚促进男性参与计划生育服务的卫生机构准备情况:对基巴哈区卫生服务提供者观点的定性研究
East Afr Health Res J. 2022;6(1):22-31. doi: 10.24248/eahrj.v6i1.675.
3
Factors affecting family planning literacy among women of childbearing age in the rural Lake zone, Tanzania.
坦桑尼亚农村湖滨地区育龄妇女计划生育素养的影响因素。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Apr 4;22(1):646. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13103-1.
4
Missed opportunity for family planning counselling along the continuum of care in Arusha region, Tanzania.坦桑尼亚阿鲁沙地区护理连续体中计划生育咨询的错失机会。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 14;16(7):e0250988. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250988. eCollection 2021.
5
Modern contraceptive availability and stockouts: a multi-country analysis of trends in supply and consumption.现代避孕用品的可及性与缺货情况:供应与消费趋势的多国分析
Health Policy Plan. 2021 Apr 21;36(3):273-287. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czaa197.
6
Client satisfaction with family planning services in the area of high unmet need: evidence from Tanzania Service Provision Assessment Survey, 2014-2015.高未满足需求地区计划生育服务的客户满意度:来自坦桑尼亚服务提供情况评估调查的证据,2014-2015 年。
Reprod Health. 2018 Jul 16;15(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s12978-018-0566-8.
7
Modern contraceptive use among HIV-infected women attending HIV care centres in Togo: a cross-sectional study.多哥艾滋病护理中心接受治疗的感染艾滋病毒女性的现代避孕措施使用情况:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 Apr 24;8(4):e019006. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019006.
8
Pathways to increased coverage: an analysis of time trends in contraceptive need and use among adolescents and young women in Kenya, Rwanda, Tanzania, and Uganda.增加覆盖范围的途径:肯尼亚、卢旺达、坦桑尼亚和乌干达青少年和年轻妇女避孕需求和使用的时间趋势分析。
Reprod Health. 2017 Oct 17;14(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s12978-017-0393-3.