Randall Philip, Johnson Quentin, Verster Anna
P Cubed Pretoria, P.O. Box 610, Silverton 0127, South Africa.
Food Nutr Bull. 2012 Dec;33(4 Suppl):S344-59. doi: 10.1177/15648265120334S311.
Wheat and maize flour fortification is a preventive food-based approach to improve the micronutrient status of populations. In 2009, the World Health Organization (WHO) released recommendations for such fortification, with guidelines on the addition levels for iron, folic acid, vitamin B12, vitamin A, and zinc at various levels of average daily consumption. Iron is the micronutrient of greatest concern to the food industry, as some believe there may be some adverse interaction(s) in some or all of the finished products produced from wheat flour and maize meal.
To determine if there were any adverse interactions due to selection of iron compounds and, if differences were noted, to quantify those differences.
Wheat flour and maize meal were sourced in Kenya, South Africa, and Tanzania, and the iron compound (sodium iron ethylenediaminetetraacetate [NaFeEDTA], ferrous fumarate, or ferrous sulfate) was varied and dosed at rates according to the WHO guidelines for consumption of 75 to 149 g/day of wheat flour and > 300 g/day of maize meal and tested again for 150 to 300 g/day for both. Bread, chapatti, ugali (thick porridge), and uji (thin porridge) were prepared locally and assessed on whether the products were acceptable under industry-approved criteria and whether industry could discern any differences, knowing that differences existed, by academic sensory analysis using a combination of trained and untrained panelists and in direct side-by-side comparison.
Industry (the wheat and maize milling sector) scored the samples as well above the minimal standard, and under academic scrutiny no differences were reported. Side-by-side comparison by the milling industry did indicate some slight differences, mainly with respect to color, although these differences did not correlate with any particular iron compound.
The levels of iron compounds used, in accordance with the WHO guidelines, do not lead to changes in the baking and cooking properties of the wheat flour and maize meal. Respondents trained to measure against a set benchmark and/or discern differences could not consistently replicate perceived difference observations.
小麦粉和玉米粉强化是一种基于食物的预防方法,旨在改善人群的微量营养素状况。2009年,世界卫生组织(WHO)发布了此类强化的建议,以及关于不同日均消费量水平下铁、叶酸、维生素B12、维生素A和锌添加量的指南。铁是食品行业最关注的微量营养素,因为一些人认为,用小麦粉和玉米粉生产的部分或全部成品中可能存在一些不良相互作用。
确定铁化合物的选择是否会产生任何不良相互作用,如果发现有差异,则对这些差异进行量化。
从小麦粉和玉米粉的来源地肯尼亚、南非和坦桑尼亚获取样本,改变铁化合物(乙二胺四乙酸铁钠[NaFeEDTA]、富马酸亚铁或硫酸亚铁),并根据WHO指南中75至149克/天小麦粉和超过300克/天玉米粉的消费量标准进行剂量设定,之后再次针对两者150至300克/天的消费量进行测试。在当地制作面包、薄饼、乌加利(稠粥)和乌吉(稀粥),并根据行业认可标准评估这些产品是否可接受,以及食品行业在知晓存在差异的情况下,能否通过使用经过培训和未经培训的评审员组合进行学术感官分析以及直接并排比较来辨别任何差异。
食品行业(小麦和玉米磨粉行业)对样本的评分远高于最低标准,且在学术审查中未报告有差异。磨粉行业的并排比较确实显示出一些细微差异,主要是在颜色方面,尽管这些差异与任何特定的铁化合物均无关联。
按照WHO指南使用的铁化合物水平不会导致小麦粉和玉米粉的烘焙及烹饪特性发生变化。接受过根据既定基准进行测量和/或辨别差异培训的受访者无法始终如一地重复察觉到的差异观察结果。