• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[靶向治疗时代转移性肾细胞癌的管理评估。一项为期六年的回顾性临床研究]

[Evaluation of the management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the era of targeted therapies. retrospective clinical study over six years].

作者信息

Latteux G, Lebdai S, Hoarau N, Abadie-Lacourtoisie S, Delva R, Chautard D, Azzouzi A-R, Bigot P

机构信息

Service d'urologie, CHU d'Angers, 4, rue Larrey, 49100 Angers, France.

出版信息

Prog Urol. 2013 Mar;23(3):184-94. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2012.09.014. Epub 2012 Oct 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.purol.2012.09.014
PMID:23446283
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the outcomes following targeted therapies in the management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), through the study of overall survival (OS) and progression-free (PFS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively included 78 patients treated with targeted therapies for mRCC at the Paul Papin Cancer Institute from 2004 to 2009. Overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), response to treatment, occurrence of grade III and IV side effects, were analyzed following first and second line treatments.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 33 months [5-236], and 41 patients died (52.6%). Median OS was 36 months [95% CI 29-43]. The median PFS was 14 months [95% CI 6.71-21.29] for sunitinib, 38 months [95% CI 11.41-64.59] for bevacizumab with interferon (IFN), and 8 months [95% CI 0-17.03] for IFN alone. A partial reduction, stabilization or increase in tumor size was observed for 19.2%, 47.4% and 25.6% of cases. A second line treatment was given for 53 patients. They received either sunitinib (n=20, 37.8%), bevacizumab with IFN (n=7, 13.2%), sorafenib (n=17, 32.2%), temsirolimus (n=3, 5.6%) or other molecules (n=6 11.2%). Grade III or IV side effects were observed for 14.1%, 28.3% and 18.2% of the patients following first, second and third line treatment, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Outcomes of targeted therapies in our center upheld the literature data. These therapies allow a benefit survival versus immunotherapy, with sometimes large side-effect.

摘要

目的

通过研究总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS),评估靶向治疗在转移性肾细胞癌(mRCC)管理中的疗效。

患者与方法

我们回顾性纳入了2004年至2009年在保罗·帕潘癌症研究所接受靶向治疗的78例mRCC患者。分析一线和二线治疗后的总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)、治疗反应、III级和IV级副作用的发生情况。

结果

中位随访时间为33个月[5 - 236],41例患者死亡(52.6%)。中位OS为36个月[95%置信区间29 - 43]。舒尼替尼的中位PFS为14个月[95%置信区间6.71 - 21.29],贝伐单抗联合干扰素(IFN)为38个月[95%置信区间11.41 - 64.59],单独使用IFN为8个月[95%置信区间0 - 17.03]。观察到19.2%、47.4%和25.6%的病例肿瘤大小有部分缩小、稳定或增大。53例患者接受了二线治疗。他们接受了舒尼替尼(n = 20,37.8%)、贝伐单抗联合IFN(n = 7,13.2%)、索拉非尼(n = 17,32.2%)、替西罗莫司(n = 3,5.6%)或其他分子(n = 6,11.2%)。分别有14.1%、28.3%和18.2%的患者在一线、二线和三线治疗后出现III级或IV级副作用。

结论

我们中心靶向治疗的疗效与文献数据一致。这些治疗与免疫治疗相比可使生存期获益,但有时副作用较大。

相似文献

1
[Evaluation of the management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the era of targeted therapies. retrospective clinical study over six years].[靶向治疗时代转移性肾细胞癌的管理评估。一项为期六年的回顾性临床研究]
Prog Urol. 2013 Mar;23(3):184-94. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2012.09.014. Epub 2012 Oct 25.
2
Second line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: The Institut Gustave Roussy experience with targeted therapies in 251 consecutive patients.转移性肾细胞癌的二线治疗:古斯塔夫·鲁西研究所 251 例连续患者应用靶向治疗的经验。
Eur J Cancer. 2013 May;49(8):1898-904. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.02.003. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
3
Sequential targeted therapy after pazopanib therapy in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer: efficacy and toxicity.帕唑帕尼治疗后转移性肾细胞癌患者的序贯靶向治疗:疗效与毒性
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2014 Aug;12(4):262-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2014.03.002. Epub 2014 Mar 14.
4
SWITCH: A Randomised, Sequential, Open-label Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Sorafenib-sunitinib Versus Sunitinib-sorafenib in the Treatment of Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer.SWITCH 研究:比较索拉非尼-舒尼替尼与舒尼替尼-索拉非尼序贯治疗转移性肾细胞癌的随机、开放标签、连续研究
Eur Urol. 2015 Nov;68(5):837-47. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.04.017. Epub 2015 May 4.
5
[Prognostic factors for metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with second-line targeted therapies].[接受二线靶向治疗的转移性肾细胞癌的预后因素]
Prog Urol. 2016 Jan;26(1):16-23. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2015.09.007. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
6
Third-line sorafenib after sequential therapy with sunitinib and mTOR inhibitors in metastatic renal cell carcinoma.多线索拉非尼治疗转移性肾细胞癌舒尼替尼和 mTOR 抑制剂序贯治疗后
Eur Urol. 2010 Dec;58(6):906-11. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.09.008. Epub 2010 Sep 24.
7
Sequence therapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: comparison of common targeted treatment options following failure of receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors.转移性肾细胞癌患者的序贯治疗:受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂治疗失败后常见靶向治疗方案的比较。
Eur Urol. 2011 Dec;60(6):1163-70. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.07.037. Epub 2011 Jul 21.
8
Baseline chronic kidney disease is associated with toxicity and survival in patients treated with targeted therapies for metastatic renal cell carcinoma.基线慢性肾脏病与接受转移性肾细胞癌靶向治疗患者的毒性反应及生存情况相关。
Anticancer Drugs. 2015 Sep;26(8):866-71. doi: 10.1097/CAD.0000000000000253.
9
Bevacizumab, sorafenib tosylate, sunitinib and temsirolimus for renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and economic evaluation.贝伐珠单抗、索拉非尼甲苯磺酸盐、舒尼替尼和替西罗莫司治疗肾细胞癌:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2010 Jan;14(2):1-184, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta14020.
10
Randomized phase III trial of temsirolimus and bevacizumab versus interferon alfa and bevacizumab in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: INTORACT trial.随机 III 期试验:替西罗莫司联合贝伐珠单抗与干扰素 α 联合贝伐珠单抗治疗转移性肾细胞癌:INTORACT 试验。
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Mar 10;32(8):752-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.50.5305. Epub 2013 Dec 2.