Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, 100 South Los Robles Avenue, Pasadena, CA 91101, USA.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Mar 20;95(6):481-7. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00109.
Poor glycemic control in patients with diabetes may be associated with adverse surgical outcomes. We sought to determine the association of diabetes status and preoperative glycemic control with several surgical outcomes, including revision arthroplasty and deep infection.
We conducted a retrospective cohort study in five regions of a large integrated health-care organization. Eligible subjects, identified from the Kaiser Permanente Total Joint Replacement Registry, underwent an elective first primary total knee arthroplasty during 2001 through 2009. Data on demographics, diabetes status, preoperative hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level, and comorbid conditions were obtained from electronic medical records. Subjects were classified as nondiabetic, diabetic with HbA1c < 7% (controlled diabetes), or diabetic with HbA1c ≥ 7% (uncontrolled diabetes). Outcomes were deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism within ninety days after surgery and revision surgery, deep infection, incident myocardial infarction, and all-cause rehospitalization within one year after surgery. Patients without diabetes were the reference group in all analyses. All models were adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, and Charlson Comorbidity Index.
Of 40,491 patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty, 7567 (18.7%) had diabetes, 464 (1.1%) underwent revision arthroplasty, and 287 (0.7%) developed a deep infection. Compared with the patients without diabetes, no association between controlled diabetes (HbA1c < 7%) and the risk of revision (odds ratio [OR], 1.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.99 to 1.76), risk of deep infection (OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.92 to 1.86), or risk of deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.60 to 1.17) was observed. Similarly, compared with patients without diabetes, no association between uncontrolled diabetes (HbA1c ≥ 7%) and the risk of revision (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.68 to 1.54), risk of deep infection (OR, 0.55; 95% CI 0.29 to 1.06), or risk of deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.43 to 1.13) was observed.
No significantly increased risk of revision arthroplasty, deep infection, or deep venous thrombosis was found in patients with diabetes (as defined on the basis of preoperative HbA1c levels and other criteria) compared with patients without diabetes in the study population of patients who underwent elective total knee arthroplasty.
糖尿病患者血糖控制不佳可能与手术不良结局相关。我们旨在确定糖尿病状态和术前血糖控制与多种手术结局的关系,包括翻修手术和深部感染。
我们在一个大型综合医疗组织的五个区域进行了回顾性队列研究。从 Kaiser Permanente 全关节置换登记处确定符合条件的受试者,他们在 2001 年至 2009 年期间接受了初次择期全膝关节置换术。从电子病历中获取人口统计学数据、糖尿病状态、术前糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平和合并症数据。根据术前 HbA1c 水平和其他标准,受试者被分为非糖尿病患者、HbA1c<7%(控制良好的糖尿病)或 HbA1c≥7%(控制不佳的糖尿病)。术后 90 天内的深静脉血栓形成或肺栓塞和翻修手术、深部感染、新发心肌梗死和术后 1 年内的全因再入院为结局。所有分析中,无糖尿病患者均为参照组。所有模型均调整了年龄、性别、体重指数和 Charlson 合并症指数。
在接受全膝关节置换术的 40491 名患者中,7567 名(18.7%)患有糖尿病,464 名(1.1%)接受了翻修手术,287 名(0.7%)发生深部感染。与无糖尿病患者相比,控制良好的糖尿病(HbA1c<7%)与翻修手术风险(比值比[OR],1.32;95%置信区间[CI],0.99 至 1.76)、深部感染风险(OR,1.31;95% CI,0.92 至 1.86)或深静脉血栓形成或肺栓塞风险(OR,0.84;95% CI,0.60 至 1.17)均无关联。同样,与无糖尿病患者相比,控制不佳的糖尿病(HbA1c≥7%)与翻修手术风险(OR,1.03;95% CI,0.68 至 1.54)、深部感染风险(OR,0.55;95% CI,0.29 至 1.06)或深静脉血栓形成或肺栓塞风险(OR,0.70;95% CI,0.43 至 1.13)均无关联。
与研究人群中接受择期全膝关节置换术的无糖尿病患者相比,根据术前 HbA1c 水平和其他标准定义的糖尿病患者,并未发现翻修手术、深部感染或深静脉血栓形成风险显著增加。