• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机构审查委员会在监督人类研究伦理方面的作用。

The role of the institutional review board in the oversight of the ethical aspects of human studies research.

机构信息

Office of Human Research Protection, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

出版信息

Nutr Clin Pract. 2013 Apr;28(2):177-81. doi: 10.1177/0884533612474042. Epub 2013 Feb 27.

DOI:10.1177/0884533612474042
PMID:23447409
Abstract

Institutional review boards are charged with overseeing that human studies research is conducted in accordance with federal and state regulations and with their own policies and procedures, with the goal of minimizing risks to participants and maximizing the quality of the research data. Nutrition research often involves vulnerable populations, including children and the cognitively impaired, for whom there are specific regulations. Ethical issues are common in nutrition research, and both the investigative team and the institutional review board should seek input regarding ethical issues that arise.

摘要

机构审查委员会的职责是监督人类研究符合联邦和州的法规以及自身的政策和程序,以尽量减少参与者的风险并提高研究数据的质量。营养研究通常涉及弱势群体,包括儿童和认知障碍者,针对这些人群有具体的规定。营养研究中常见伦理问题,调查小组和机构审查委员会都应该就出现的伦理问题寻求意见。

相似文献

1
The role of the institutional review board in the oversight of the ethical aspects of human studies research.机构审查委员会在监督人类研究伦理方面的作用。
Nutr Clin Pract. 2013 Apr;28(2):177-81. doi: 10.1177/0884533612474042. Epub 2013 Feb 27.
2
Institutional review boards (IRBs) failed to use steps to protect vulnerable research subjects.机构审查委员会(IRB)未能采取措施保护易受伤害的研究对象。
Hum Res Rep. 2003 Jun;18(6):6-7.
3
Recommendations for federal "super agency" would affect institutional review boards.针对联邦“超级机构”的建议将影响机构审查委员会。
Hum Res Rep. 2001 Feb;16(2):1-3.
4
Protecting vulnerable research subjects: practical realities of institutional review board review and approval.保护弱势研究对象:机构审查委员会审查与批准的实际情况
J Health Care Law Policy. 1998;1(1):88-104.
5
Some questionable premises about research ethics.关于研究伦理的一些可疑前提。
Am J Bioeth. 2005 Winter;5(1):29-31; author reply W15-8. doi: 10.1080/15265160590927769.
6
Ethical oversight of research in developing countries.发展中国家研究的伦理监督。
IRB. 2003 Mar-Apr;25(2):1-10.
7
Practical guide to understanding clinical research compliance.临床研究合规性实用指南。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014 May;150(5):716-21. doi: 10.1177/0194599814524895. Epub 2014 Mar 5.
8
Has compliance eclipsed ethics? Should we expect serious ethical consideration or give up and admit that regulations are the only hope?
Prot Hum Subj. 2005 Summer(12):7-9.
9
Research involving children: regulations, review boards and reform.涉及儿童的研究:法规、审查委员会与改革
J Health Care Law Policy. 2005;8(2):264-330.
10
National commission proposes numerous new regulations of institutional review boards.国家委员会提议对机构审查委员会制定众多新规定。
Hum Res Rep. 1998 Oct;13(10):1-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Machine Learning in Healthcare.医疗保健中的机器学习
Curr Genomics. 2021 Dec 16;22(4):291-300. doi: 10.2174/1389202922666210705124359.