Center for Bioethics and, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Liver Transpl. 2013 Apr;19(4):362-8. doi: 10.1002/lt.23603. Epub 2013 Mar 22.
Publication is one of the primary rewards in the academic research community and is the first step in the dissemination of a new discovery that could lead to recognition and opportunity. Because of this, the publication of research can serve as a tacit endorsement of the methodology behind the science. This becomes a problem when vulnerable populations that are incapable of giving legitimate informed consent, such as prisoners, are used in research. The problem is especially critical in the field of transplant research, in which unverified consent can enable research that exploits the vulnerabilities of prisoners, especially those awaiting execution. Because the doctrine of informed consent is central to the protection of vulnerable populations, we have performed a historical analysis of the standards of informed consent in codes of international human subject protections to form the foundation for our limit and ban recommendations: (1) limit the publication of transplant research involving prisoners in general and (2) ban the publication of transplant research involving executed prisoners in particular.
发表论文是学术研究界的主要奖励之一,也是新发现传播的第一步,新发现可能带来认可和机会。正因为如此,研究的发表可以作为对科学背后方法的默许认可。当囚犯等无法合法表示知情同意的弱势群体被用于研究时,就会出现问题。在移植研究领域,这个问题尤其关键,未经核实的同意可能会使研究利用囚犯的弱点,尤其是那些等待处决的囚犯。由于知情同意原则是保护弱势群体的核心,我们对国际人体受试者保护规范中的知情同意标准进行了历史分析,为我们的限制和禁止建议奠定了基础:(1)限制一般涉及囚犯的移植研究的发表,(2)禁止涉及已处决囚犯的移植研究的发表。