Horsfall Leigh, Macdonald Graeme, Scott Ian, Skoien Richard, Khatun Mohsina, Moss Cathy, Seligman Clare, Kardash Christine, Poxon Vicki, Powell Elizabeth E
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
Aust Health Rev. 2013 May;37(2):218-22. doi: 10.1071/AH12162.
To determine the spectrum of disease among non-urgent referrals to a tertiary hospital hepatology outpatient clinic, assess the adequacy of referral information in terms of risk stratification and determine whether a specifically designed referral template altered urgency for specialist assessment.
A snapshot of the waiting list of a hepatology clinic at a tertiary hospital was taken from the scheduling database. Information was retrieved from referrals and attached investigations. Updated information was requested from subjects and their current general practitioner.
Hepatitis C virus accounted for 68.7% of the 1223 reviewed referrals. Clinical information provided by referring clinicians was often incomplete. Provision of updated information identified the presence of comorbidities (obesity, 'heavy' alcohol consumption, mental health issues) and altered the need or urgency for specialist assessment in 22% of cases.
Hepatitis C virus accounts for the majority of non-urgent referrals waiting to access hepatology outpatient consultations. Using a standardised assessment form as part of the referral process provides more information on comorbidities and risk factors and facilitates more accurate triaging of clinical urgency. Wider adoption of this strategy may increase appropriate access to hepatology services and reduce the future burden of cirrhosis and hepatocellular cancer. WHAT IS KNOWN ABOUT THE TOPIC? Little published data are available that describe the content and standard of hepatology referrals, or the urgency with which these patients need to be reviewed. Inadequate clinical information impairs the ability to accurately triage referrals and may lead to delays in access. WHAT DOES THE PAPER ADD? Almost 70% of reviewed referrals were for management of patients with hepatitis C virus infection, confirming this condition remains a major priority area in liver disease. Clinical information provided by referring clinicians was often incomplete, impairing the ability to accurately triage referrals. Only a minority of referrals provided information about relevant comorbidities (alcohol intake, injecting drug use, mental health issues and obesity) that negatively impact on the progression of liver disease or the response to antiviral treatment. WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTITIONERS? Hepatitis C virus remains a major health priority area in liver disease, increasing the future burden of cirrhosis and hepatocellular cancer. Many referred patients have comorbidities that increase their risk of progressive liver disease and related complications. Strategies to increase recognition and management of liver disease and its comorbidities in the community are required. The use of a standardised assessment form in referrals to hepatology outpatient services may assist with triaging of patients and improve access to appropriate care.
确定三级医院肝病门诊非紧急转诊患者的疾病谱,评估转诊信息在风险分层方面的充分性,并确定专门设计的转诊模板是否改变了专科评估的紧迫性。
从排班数据库中获取一家三级医院肝病门诊等候名单的快照。从转诊记录及相关检查中获取信息。向患者及其现任全科医生索要更新后的信息。
在1223份经审查的转诊病例中,丙型肝炎病毒感染占68.7%。转诊医生提供的临床信息往往不完整。提供更新后的信息发现了合并症(肥胖、大量饮酒、心理健康问题)的存在,并在22%的病例中改变了专科评估的需求或紧迫性。
丙型肝炎病毒感染是等待肝病门诊会诊的非紧急转诊患者中的主要病因。在转诊过程中使用标准化评估表可提供更多关于合并症和风险因素的信息,并有助于更准确地对临床紧迫性进行分类。更广泛地采用这一策略可能会增加获得肝病服务的机会,并减轻未来肝硬化和肝细胞癌的负担。关于该主题已知的情况是什么?关于肝病转诊的内容和标准,或这些患者需要接受复查的紧迫性,几乎没有公开数据。临床信息不足会削弱准确分类转诊的能力,并可能导致就诊延迟。本文补充了什么内容?近70%经审查的转诊病例是为了管理丙型肝炎病毒感染患者,证实这种疾病仍是肝病的一个主要重点领域。转诊医生提供的临床信息往往不完整,削弱了准确分类转诊的能力。只有少数转诊病例提供了有关对肝病进展或抗病毒治疗反应有负面影响的相关合并症(饮酒、注射吸毒、心理健康问题和肥胖)的信息。对从业者有何启示?丙型肝炎病毒仍然是肝病的一个主要健康重点领域,增加了未来肝硬化和肝细胞癌的负担。许多转诊患者有合并症,增加了其发生进行性肝病及相关并发症的风险。需要采取策略提高社区对肝病及其合并症的认识和管理。在转诊至肝病门诊服务时使用标准化评估表可能有助于对患者进行分类,并改善获得适当治疗的机会。