Suppr超能文献

重症急性胰腺炎:不同严重程度的临床类型

Severe acute pancreatitis: clinical forms of different gravity.

作者信息

Neri Vincenzo, Ambrosi Antonio, Fersini Alberto, Tartaglia Nicola, Lapolla Francesco, Forlano Immacolata

出版信息

Ann Ital Chir. 2013 Jan-Feb;84(1):47-53.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS

Severe Acute Pancreatitis (SAP) is characterized by some degree of severity. The aim of this study is to indentify within severe forms the critical, early severe acute pancreatitis (ESAP).

METHODS AND PATIENTS

Since 1997 to 2011 we have treated 276 acute biliary pancreatitis. SAP was 21.7% (60); among SAP were defined 13 (21.6%) ESAP as presence of organ dysfunction within 72 hours after onset of symptoms. Clinical features, organ failure, therapeutic choices and results between SAP (47) and ESAP (13) were compared.

RESULTS

The comparison has shown the following results: impairment degree of pancreas (Balthazar CT score): SAP 2.3 - ESAP 3.85; abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS): ESAP 7.6% (1/13); MODS: ESAP 46.1% (6/13); simgle organ dysfunction: SAP 51% (24/47) - ESAP 53.8% (7/13) ; hypoxemia: SAP 65.9 % (31/47) - ESAP 76.9% (10/13); pancreatic infections: SAP 6.3% (3/47) - ESAP 23% (3/13); mortality: SAP 4.2% (2/47) - ESAP 15.4% (2/13).

DISCUSSION

ESAP is characterized early by major incidence of ACS, MODS, impairment degree of the pancreas. In a later phase the gravity of severe pancreatitis lies on the septic complications of fluid necrotic collections. In ESAP the mortality is higher: 15.4% because of multiorgan dysfunction (in first phase); in SAP is 4.3% because of septic complications (in later phase).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of SAP and ESAP is now more conservative and less invasive than in the past: intensive care, prevention of intestinal failure and assure papillary patency in the first phase of the disease. In the later phase therapeutic procedure for fluid necrotic collections is US/CT percutaneous catheter drainage.

摘要

引言与目的

重症急性胰腺炎(SAP)具有一定程度的严重性。本研究的目的是在重症形式中识别出关键的早期重症急性胰腺炎(ESAP)。

方法与患者

自1997年至2011年,我们共治疗了276例急性胆源性胰腺炎。SAP占21.7%(60例);在SAP患者中,有13例(21.6%)被定义为ESAP,即症状发作后72小时内出现器官功能障碍。比较了SAP(47例)和ESAP(13例)的临床特征、器官衰竭、治疗选择及结果。

结果

比较结果如下:胰腺损伤程度(巴尔萨泽CT评分):SAP为2.3 - ESAP为3.85;腹腔间隔室综合征(ACS):ESAP为7.6%(1/13);多器官功能障碍综合征(MODS):ESAP为46.1%(6/13);单器官功能障碍:SAP为51%(24/47) - ESAP为53.8%(7/13);低氧血症:SAP为65.9%(31/47) - ESAP为76.9%(10/13);胰腺感染:SAP为6.3%(3/47) - ESAP为23%(3/13);死亡率:SAP为4.2%(2/47) - ESAP为15.4%(2/13)。

讨论

ESAP早期的特点是ACS、MODS的发生率高以及胰腺损伤程度严重。在后期,重症胰腺炎的严重性在于液体坏死性积聚的感染性并发症。ESAP的死亡率更高:由于多器官功能障碍(在第一阶段)为15.4%;SAP由于感染性并发症(在后期)为4.3%。

结论

现在对SAP和ESAP的治疗比过去更加保守且侵入性更小:在疾病的第一阶段进行重症监护、预防肠衰竭并确保乳头通畅。在后期,针对液体坏死性积聚的治疗方法是超声/CT引导下经皮置管引流。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验