Jain Arpana, Vargas H David
Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky.
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2012 Mar;25(1):37-45. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1301758.
Although acute colonic pseudo-obstruction (ACPO), also known as Ogilvie syndrome, is a well-known clinical entity, in many respects it remains poorly understood and continues to challenge physicians and surgeons alike. Our understanding of ACPO continues to evolve and its epidemiology has changed as new conditions have been identified predisposing to ACPO with critical illness providing the common thread among them. A physician must keep ACPO high in the list of differential diagnoses when dealing with the patient experiencing abdominal distention, and one must be prepared to employ and interpret imaging studies to exclude mechanical obstruction. Rapid diagnosis is the key, and institution of conservative measures often will lead to resolution. Fortunately, when this fails pharmacologic intervention with neostigmine often proves effective. However, it is not a panacea: consensus on dosing does not exist, administration techniques vary and may impact efficacy, contraindications limit its use, and persistence and or recurrence of ACPO mandate continued search for additional medical therapies. When medical therapy fails or is contraindicated, endoscopy offers effective intervention with advanced techniques such as decompression tubes or percutaneous endoscopic cecostomy providing effective results. Operative intervention remains the treatment of last resort; surgical outcomes are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Therefore, a surgeon should be aware of all options for decompression-conservative, pharmacologic, and endoscopic-and use them in best combination to the advantage of patients who often suffer from significant concurrent illnesses making them poor operative candidates.
尽管急性结肠假性梗阻(ACPO),也称为奥吉尔维综合征,是一种广为人知的临床病症,但在许多方面人们对它仍了解甚少,并且继续给内科医生和外科医生带来挑战。随着新的易患ACPO的情况被发现,我们对ACPO的认识不断发展,其流行病学也发生了变化,危重病是这些情况的共同主线。在处理腹胀患者时,医生必须将ACPO列为鉴别诊断的重要考虑因素,并且必须准备好运用和解读影像学检查以排除机械性梗阻。快速诊断是关键,采取保守措施往往会使病情得到缓解。幸运的是,当保守治疗无效时,新斯的明药物干预通常证明是有效的。然而,它并非万灵药:在给药剂量上尚未达成共识,给药技术各不相同且可能影响疗效,禁忌症限制了其使用,ACPO的持续存在和/或复发促使人们继续寻找其他药物治疗方法。当药物治疗无效或存在禁忌症时,内镜检查提供了有效的干预手段,如减压管或经皮内镜下盲肠造口术等先进技术可取得有效效果。手术干预仍然是最后的治疗手段;手术结果与显著的发病率和死亡率相关。因此,外科医生应了解所有的减压选择——保守治疗、药物治疗和内镜治疗——并以最佳组合方式应用它们,以利于那些常患有严重合并症而不适合手术的患者。