Suppr超能文献

VEGF、sVEGFR-2 和 CEA 在 mCRC 研究中比较西地尼布、贝伐珠单抗和化疗的预后和预测价值。

Prognostic and predictive value of VEGF, sVEGFR-2 and CEA in mCRC studies comparing cediranib, bevacizumab and chemotherapy.

机构信息

Translational Sciences, Oncology, AstraZeneca, Alderley Park, Macclesfield SK10 4TG, UK.

出版信息

Br J Cancer. 2013 Apr 2;108(6):1316-23. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.79. Epub 2013 Feb 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The prognostic/predictive value of potential vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signalling biomarkers was evaluated retrospectively using samples from two randomized Phase III studies (HORIZON II and III) investigating cediranib in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

METHODS

Baseline levels of VEGF, soluble VEGF receptor-2 (sVEGFR-2) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) were measured in plasma/serum samples collected from patients participating in HORIZON II (n=860; FOLFOX/XELOX plus cediranib 20 mg (n=502) or placebo (n=358)) and HORIZON III (n=1422; mFOLFOX6 plus cediranib 20 mg (n=709) or bevacizumab (n=713)). Median biomarker baseline levels determined cutoff values for the patient subgroups.

RESULTS

Baseline data were available for 88-97% of patients/study (>2000 patients). In both the studies, high baseline VEGF and CEA were associated with worse outcomes for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) independent of treatment (HORIZON II OS: VEGF, hazard ratio (HR)=1.35 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.12-1.63); CEA, HR=1.63 (1.36-1.96); HORIZON III OS: VEGF, HR=1.32 (1.12-1.54); CEA, HR=1.50 (1.29-1.76)). sVEGFR-2 was not prognostic for PFS/OS. Baseline VEGF and CEA were not predictive for PFS/OS outcome to cediranib treatment; low sVEGFR-2 was associated with a trend towards improved cediranib effect in HORIZON II.

CONCLUSION

Baseline VEGF and CEA levels were treatment-independent prognostic biomarkers for PFS and OS in both the studies.

摘要

背景

使用来自两项评估西地尼布治疗转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)的随机 III 期研究(HORIZON II 和 III)的样本,回顾性评估了潜在血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)信号标志物的预后/预测价值。

方法

在参加 HORIZON II(n=860;FOLFOX/XELOX 联合西地尼布 20mg(n=502)或安慰剂(n=358))和 HORIZON III(n=1422;mFOLFOX6 联合西地尼布 20mg(n=709)或贝伐珠单抗(n=713))的患者的血浆/血清样本中测量了基线 VEGF、可溶性 VEGF 受体-2(sVEGFR-2)和癌胚抗原(CEA)水平。根据患者亚组确定了中位生物标志物基线水平的截断值。

结果

在两项研究中,88-97%的患者/研究(>2000 名患者)可获得基线数据。在这两项研究中,基线高 VEGF 和 CEA 与无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)的预后不良独立于治疗相关(HORIZON II OS:VEGF,风险比(HR)=1.35(95%置信区间(CI):1.12-1.63);CEA,HR=1.63(1.36-1.96);HORIZON III OS:VEGF,HR=1.32(1.12-1.54);CEA,HR=1.50(1.29-1.76))。sVEGFR-2 对 PFS/OS 无预后意义。基线 VEGF 和 CEA 对西地尼布治疗的 PFS/OS 结果无预测意义;基线 sVEGFR-2 较低与 HORIZON II 中西地尼布疗效的改善趋势相关。

结论

在这两项研究中,基线 VEGF 和 CEA 水平是 PFS 和 OS 的独立于治疗的预后生物标志物。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5a7/3619270/bd6bdb6cfe48/bjc201379f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验