• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评价一种针对高再狭窄风险患者的选择性药物洗脱支架植入术的政策。

Evaluation of a policy of selective drug-eluting stent implantation for patients at high risk of restenosis.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Liverpool Hospital, South Western Sydney Clinical School, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Heart Lung Circ. 2013 Jul;22(7):523-32. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2012.12.011. Epub 2013 Feb 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.hlc.2012.12.011
PMID:23454032
Abstract

Drug-eluting stent (DES) deployment during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has reduced target-vessel revascularisation rates (TVR). The selective use of DES in patients at highest risk of restenosis may allay concerns about universal compliance of dual antiplatelet therapy for one year, and potentially reduce costs. If this strategy achieved acceptably low TVR rates, such an approach could be attractive. Late clinical outcomes were examined in 2115 consecutive patients (mean age 63±12 years, 75% male, 22% diabetics) who underwent PCI in the first three years from October 2003, after commencing the following selective criteria for DES use: left main stenosis; ostial lesions of major epicardial arteries; proximal LAD lesions; lesions≥20mm in length with vessel diameter≤3.0mm; lesions in vessels≤2.5mm; diabetics with vessel(s)≤3.0mm; and in-stent restenosis. Among patients undergoing PCI, 2075 (98%) patients received stents (29%≥1 DES and 71% bare metal stent [BMS]), and among those who received DES, there was a 92% compliance with these criteria. There were no differences in clinical outcomes between the two stent groups except for definite stent thrombosis, which occurred in 2% after DES, and 0.6% after BMS at one year (p=0.002). With BMS, large coronary arteries (≥3.5mm), intermediate (3-3.49mm) and small arteries (<3mm) in diameter had a TVR rate at one year of 3.6%, 7.2% and 8.2% respectively (p=0.005). It is possible to use selective criteria for DES while maintaining low TVR rates. The TVR rate with BMS was low in those with stent diameters≥3.5mm. The higher DES stent thrombosis rate reflects first generation DES use, though whether routine second generation DES use reduces these rates needs confirmation.

摘要

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)中药物洗脱支架(DES)的应用降低了靶血管血运重建率(TVR)。在有再狭窄高危风险的患者中选择性使用 DES,可能减轻对双联抗血小板治疗 1 年的普遍依从性的担忧,并可能降低成本。如果这种策略实现了可接受的低 TVR 率,那么这种方法可能具有吸引力。在 2003 年 10 月开始使用以下选择性 DES 使用标准后的头 3 年内接受 PCI 的 2115 例连续患者(平均年龄 63±12 岁,75%为男性,22%为糖尿病患者)中检查了晚期临床结局:左主干狭窄;主要心外膜动脉开口病变;近端 LAD 病变;长度≥20mm 且血管直径≤3.0mm 的病变;血管直径≤2.5mm 的病变;血管直径≤3.0mm 的糖尿病患者;以及支架内再狭窄。在接受 PCI 的患者中,2075 例(98%)患者接受了支架(29%≥1 个 DES 和 71%为裸金属支架 [BMS]),而在接受 DES 的患者中,有 92%符合这些标准。两组支架患者的临床结局无差异,除了明确的支架血栓形成,DES 组发生率为 2%,BMS 组发生率为 0.6%,均发生在 1 年时(p=0.002)。对于 BMS,直径≥3.5mm(大冠状动脉)、直径为 3-3.49mm(中等)和直径<3mm(小)的冠状动脉,1 年时的 TVR 率分别为 3.6%、7.2%和 8.2%(p=0.005)。使用选择性 DES 标准的同时保持低 TVR 率是可行的。BMS 组中支架直径≥3.5mm 的患者 TVR 率较低。DES 支架血栓形成率较高反映了第一代 DES 的使用,尽管常规第二代 DES 是否可以降低这些比率需要进一步证实。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of a policy of selective drug-eluting stent implantation for patients at high risk of restenosis.评价一种针对高再狭窄风险患者的选择性药物洗脱支架植入术的政策。
Heart Lung Circ. 2013 Jul;22(7):523-32. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2012.12.011. Epub 2013 Feb 28.
2
Characteristics of patients and types of lesions in patients with drug-eluting or bare-metal stent implantation in small coronary arteries: from the FU-Registry.小冠状动脉内药物洗脱支架或金属裸支架植入患者的患者特征和病变类型:来自 FU-Registry。
J Cardiol. 2013 Feb;61(2):117-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2012.09.008. Epub 2012 Nov 16.
3
Are drug-eluting stents indicated in large coronary arteries? Insights from a multi-centre percutaneous coronary intervention registry.药物洗脱支架适用于大冠状动脉吗?来自多中心经皮冠状动脉介入治疗注册研究的见解。
Int J Cardiol. 2008 Nov 28;130(3):374-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2008.06.046. Epub 2008 Aug 15.
4
Deployment of drug-eluting stents for isolated proximal lad disease is associated with lower major adverse cardiac events and no increase in stent thrombosis when compared with bare metal stents: a 5-year observational cohort study.与金属裸支架相比,药物洗脱支架治疗孤立性近端 lad 病变与较低的主要不良心脏事件和支架血栓形成无关:一项 5 年观察性队列研究。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 May;81(6):E237-44. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24513. Epub 2012 Nov 14.
5
Incidence of definite stent thrombosis or in-stent restenosis after drug-eluting stent implantation for treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis: from Western Denmark Heart Registry.药物洗脱支架置入治疗冠状动脉支架内再狭窄后明确的支架血栓形成或支架内再狭窄发生率:来自丹麦西部心脏注册研究。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Feb;81(2):260-5. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24398. Epub 2012 Nov 8.
6
Long-term efficacy and safety of drug-eluting stent implantation for patients with multiple coronary chronic total occlusions.药物洗脱支架置入治疗多支冠状动脉慢性完全闭塞病变的长期疗效及安全性。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2010 Apr 5;123(7):789-93.
7
Late outcomes after drug-eluting stent implantation in "real-world" clinical practice.药物洗脱支架植入在“真实世界”临床实践中的远期疗效。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2008 Oct;20(10):493-500.
8
Bare-metal stent versus drug-eluting stent in large coronary arteries: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.大冠状动脉中金属裸支架与药物洗脱支架的比较:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Jun 1;81(7):1087-94. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24599. Epub 2013 Feb 26.
9
Clinical outcomes following drug-eluting versus bare metal stent implantation for lesion subsets excluded from pivotal clinical trials: findings from the GHOST Study (Guthrie Health System Off-Label StenT Study).药物洗脱支架与裸金属支架植入治疗关键临床试验排除的病变亚组后的临床结局:GHOST研究(格思里医疗系统非标签支架研究)的结果
J Interv Cardiol. 2008 Aug;21(4):315-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2008.00380.x.
10
Percutaneous treatment of multivessel coronary disease in the drug eluting stent era: comparison of bare-metal stents, drug-eluting stents and a mixed approach in a large multicentre registry.药物洗脱支架时代多支冠状动脉疾病的经皮治疗:大型多中心注册研究中裸金属支架、药物洗脱支架及混合治疗方法的比较
EuroIntervention. 2007 Feb;2(4):474-80.

引用本文的文献

1
Varying definitions for periprocedural myocardial infarction alter event rates and prognostic implications.围手术期心肌梗死的不同定义会改变事件发生率和预后影响。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2014 Oct 30;3(6):e001086. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.114.001086.