• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

昆虫社会中的任务分工:非随机的直接物质转移会影响群体效率和信息流。

Task-partitioning in insect societies: Non-random direct material transfers affect both colony efficiency and information flow.

机构信息

Laboratory of Apiculture & Social Insects, School of Life Sciences, John Maynard-Smith Building, University of Sussex, Falmer BN1 9QG, UK.

出版信息

J Theor Biol. 2013 Jun 21;327:23-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2013.02.013. Epub 2013 Feb 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.jtbi.2013.02.013
PMID:23454081
Abstract

Task-partitioning is an important organisational principle in insect colonies and is thought to increase colony efficiency. In task-partitioning, tasks such as the collection of resources are divided into subtasks in which the material is passed from one worker to another. Previous models have assumed that worker-worker interactions are random, but experimental evidence suggests that receivers can have preferences to handle familiar materials. We used an agent-based simulation model to explore how non-random interactions during task-partitioning with direct transfer affect colony work efficiency. Because task-partitioning also allows receivers and donors to acquire foraging related information we analysed the effect of non-random interactions on informative interaction patterns. When receivers non-randomly rejected donors offering certain materials, donors overall experienced increased time delays, hive stay durations and a decreased number of transfer partners. However, the number of transfers was slightly increased, which can improve the acquisition and quality of information for donors. When receivers were non-randomly attracted to donors offering certain materials, donors experienced reduced transfer delays, hive stay durations and an increased number of simultaneous receivers. The number of transfers is slightly decreased. The effects of the two mechanisms "non-random rejection" and "non-random attraction" are biggest if the number of foragers and receivers is balanced. In summary, our results show that colony ergonomics are improved if receivers do not reject donors and if mechanisms exist that help receivers detect potential donors, such as learning the odour of the transferred food. Finally, our simulations suggest that non-random interactions can potentially affect the foraging patterns of colonies in changing environments.

摘要

任务分工是昆虫群体中的一个重要组织原则,被认为可以提高群体效率。在任务分工中,资源收集等任务被细分为子任务,材料在工人之间传递。以前的模型假设工人之间的相互作用是随机的,但实验证据表明,接收者可以优先处理熟悉的材料。我们使用基于代理的模拟模型来探索具有直接转移的任务分工中非随机相互作用如何影响群体工作效率。由于任务分工还允许接收者和捐赠者获取与觅食相关的信息,我们分析了非随机相互作用对信息交互模式的影响。当接收者非随机地拒绝提供某些材料的捐赠者时,捐赠者总体上会经历更长的时间延迟、更长的蜂巢停留时间和更少的转移伙伴。然而,转移次数略有增加,这可以提高捐赠者获取和信息质量。当接收者非随机地被提供某些材料的捐赠者吸引时,捐赠者会经历更短的转移延迟、更短的蜂巢停留时间和更多的同时接收者。转移次数略有减少。如果觅食者和接收者的数量平衡,“非随机拒绝”和“非随机吸引”这两种机制的效果最大。总之,如果接收者不拒绝捐赠者,并且存在帮助接收者检测潜在捐赠者的机制,例如学习转移食物的气味,那么群体的工效学就会得到改善。最后,我们的模拟表明,非随机相互作用可能会影响到在不断变化的环境中觅食的群体的模式。

相似文献

1
Task-partitioning in insect societies: Non-random direct material transfers affect both colony efficiency and information flow.昆虫社会中的任务分工:非随机的直接物质转移会影响群体效率和信息流。
J Theor Biol. 2013 Jun 21;327:23-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2013.02.013. Epub 2013 Feb 27.
2
Task Partitioning in Insect Societies. II. Use of Queueing Delay Information in Recruitment.昆虫社会中的任务划分。II. 招募中排队延迟信息的利用。
Am Nat. 1999 Nov;154(5):536-548. doi: 10.1086/303256.
3
Task Partitioning in Insect Societies. I. Effect of Colony Size on Queueing Delay and Colony Ergonomic Efficiency.昆虫社会中的任务划分。I. 群体规模对排队延迟和群体工效学效率的影响。
Am Nat. 1999 Nov;154(5):521-535. doi: 10.1086/303255.
4
Intelligent decisions from the hive mind: foragers and nectar receivers of Apis mellifera collaborate to optimise active forager numbers.蜂群思维的明智决策:西方蜜蜂的觅食者和花蜜接收者协作以优化活跃觅食者数量。
J Theor Biol. 2011 Feb 21;271(1):64-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.11.027. Epub 2010 Nov 30.
5
How bees tune their dancing according to their colony's nectar influx: re-examining the role of the food-receivers' 'eagerness'.蜜蜂如何根据蜂群的花蜜流入量调整其舞蹈:重新审视食物接收者“急切程度”的作用。
J Exp Biol. 2006 Feb;209(Pt 3):421-32. doi: 10.1242/jeb.02025.
6
Regulation of task differentiation in wasp societies: a bottom-up model of the "common stomach".蜂群中任务分工的调节:“共同胃”的自下而上模型
J Theor Biol. 2012 Feb 7;294:98-113. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2011.10.037. Epub 2011 Nov 7.
7
Emergent polyethism as a consequence of increased colony size in insect societies.昆虫社会中群体规模增加导致的应急多态行为。
J Theor Biol. 2002 Apr 7;215(3):363-73. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.2001.2506.
8
Non-random nectar unloading interactions between foragers and their receivers in the honeybee hive.蜜蜂蜂巢中觅食者与其接收者之间非随机的花蜜卸载互动。
Naturwissenschaften. 2005 Sep;92(9):440-3. doi: 10.1007/s00114-005-0016-7. Epub 2005 Oct 28.
9
Partial nectar loads as a cause of multiple nectar transfer in the honey bee (Apis mellifera): a simulation model.蜜蜂(西方蜜蜂)中部分花蜜负载作为多次花蜜转移原因的模拟模型
J Theor Biol. 2003 May 7;222(1):1-8. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(02)00487-3.
10
Nutritional status influences socially regulated foraging ontogeny in honey bees.营养状况影响蜜蜂社会调节的觅食个体发育。
J Exp Biol. 2005 Dec;208(Pt 24):4641-9. doi: 10.1242/jeb.01956.

引用本文的文献

1
A Data-Driven Simulation of the Trophallactic Network and Intranidal Food Flow Dissemination in Ants.基于数据驱动的蚂蚁交哺网络及巢内食物流传播模拟
Animals (Basel). 2022 Oct 28;12(21):2963. doi: 10.3390/ani12212963.
2
Consequences of a warming climate for social organisation in sweat bees.气候变暖对汗蜂社会组织的影响。
Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2016;70:1131-1139. doi: 10.1007/s00265-016-2118-y. Epub 2016 Apr 30.
3
Sequential Subterranean Transport of Excavated Sand and Foraged Seeds in Nests of the Harvester Ant, Pogonomyrmex badius.
收获蚁(Pogonomyrmex badius)巢穴中挖掘出的沙子和觅食种子的顺序性地下运输
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 28;10(10):e0139922. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139922. eCollection 2015.
4
Composite collective decision-making.复合集体决策
Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Jun 22;282(1809):20142723. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.2723.