Suppr超能文献

小儿心脏手术后膈神经损伤:膈的激进折叠术有益吗?

Phrenic nerve injury after paediatric heart surgery: is aggressive plication of the diaphragm beneficial?

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Cardiology, National Heart Hospital, Sofia, Bulgaria.

出版信息

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 Nov;44(5):808-12. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezt110. Epub 2013 Mar 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Phrenic nerve injury after paediatric heart surgery is associated with significant morbidity. Surgical plication of the diaphragm is believed to be beneficial to the patient, with difficult weaning from ventilation; however, the optimal timing remains unclear. We aimed to compare the outcome after two different strategies for treating hemidiaphragmatic paresis.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of all patients with paresis of the diaphragm between 2000 and 2010 was performed, with special attention to the rate of reintubations, ventilation and intensive care unit (ICU) stay and the rate of plication. In 2005, the strategy for treating diaphragmatic paresis in our institution changed from conservative treatment with plication after multiple extubation efforts towards an aggressive one with plication after a single unsuccessful extubation. We compared the outcome of all patients and that of the newborns separately from the two periods.

RESULTS

During the study period, 148 patients with diaphragmatic paresis were diagnosed and included. Median age at the cardiac operation was 7 months (1 day-18 years), ventilation time ranged from 4 h to 41 days (median 7 days), 42 (28.4%) of the patients required at least one reintubation and ICU stay ranged from 2 to 63 days (median 11 days). A total of 63 plications were performed-5 (9%) before 2004 and 58 (62%) after 2005, P < 0.001. There were no significant differences in the ventilation time-6 (1-40) vs 8 (0-41) days, P = 0.36, reintubation rate-28 vs 29%, P = 0.85 and ICU stay-10 (3-63) vs 12 (2-55) days, P = 0.41 between both groups. The newborn patients, treated with the different strategies, also did not differ significantly in their outcome: ventilation time-12 (2-40) vs 11.5 (3-34) days, P = 0.38; reintubation rate-43 vs 41%, P = 0.62; ICU stay-16 (6-63) vs 15 (7-55) days, P = 0.55.

CONCLUSIONS

Changing the strategy for phrenic nerve injury after paediatric heart surgery towards a more aggressive one with early plication of the diaphragm was not associated with the better outcome. Prospective randomized studies are needed to determine the optimal management of this complication.

摘要

目的

小儿心脏手术后膈神经损伤与显著的发病率有关。膈神经折叠术被认为对患者有益,可减少撤机困难,但最佳时机仍不清楚。我们旨在比较两种不同策略治疗膈肌麻痹的结果。

方法

对 2000 年至 2010 年间所有膈肌无力患者进行回顾性分析,特别关注再插管率、通气和重症监护病房(ICU)停留时间以及折叠术的发生率。2005 年,我们医院治疗膈肌麻痹的策略从多次拔管尝试后的保守折叠术治疗转变为单次拔管失败后的积极折叠术治疗。我们比较了两个时期所有患者和新生儿的结果。

结果

在研究期间,共诊断并纳入了 148 例膈肌无力患者。心脏手术时的中位年龄为 7 个月(1 天至 18 岁),通气时间为 4 小时至 41 天(中位数为 7 天),42 例(28.4%)患者至少需要一次再插管,ICU 停留时间为 2 天至 63 天(中位数为 11 天)。共进行了 63 次折叠术-5 次(9%)在 2004 年之前,58 次(62%)在 2005 年之后,P<0.001。两组之间的通气时间(1-40 天)和(0-41 天),P=0.36;再插管率(28%)和(29%),P=0.85;ICU 停留时间(3-63 天)和(2-55 天),P=0.41 均无显著差异。接受不同策略治疗的新生儿患者在结果上也无显著差异:通气时间(12-40 天)和(11.5-34 天),P=0.38;再插管率(43%)和(41%),P=0.62;ICU 停留时间(6-63 天)和(7-55 天),P=0.55。

结论

小儿心脏手术后膈神经损伤治疗策略向早期膈神经折叠术更积极的方向转变,并未改善预后。需要前瞻性随机研究来确定这种并发症的最佳管理方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验