• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在以社区为基础的住院心肌梗死患者中,药物治疗、再灌注治疗与生存。

Medication, reperfusion therapy and survival in a community-based setting of hospitalised myocardial infarction.

机构信息

Duke Clinical Research Institute, 2400 Pratt Street, Room 0311 Terrace Level, Durham, NC 27705, USA.

出版信息

Heart. 2013 Jun;99(11):767-73. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2012-303244. Epub 2013 Mar 2.

DOI:10.1136/heartjnl-2012-303244
PMID:23456567
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4118665/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine the survival benefit of multiple medical therapies in a large, community-based population of validated myocardial infarction (MI) events.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational cohort study.

SETTING

Population-based sample of 30 986 definite or probable MIs in residents of four US communities aged 35-74 years randomly sampled between 1987 and 2008 as part of the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Surveillance Study.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

All-cause mortality 30, 90 and 365 days after discharge.

RESULTS

We used unadjusted and propensity score (PS) adjusted models to examine the relationship between medical therapy use and mortality. In unadjusted models, each medication and procedure was inversely associated with 30-day mortality. After PS adjustment, the crude survival benefits were attenuated for all therapies except for intravenous tissue plasminogen activator therapy (IV-tPA) and stent use. After inclusion of other therapies received during the event in regression models, risk ratio effect estimates (RR; (95% CI)) were attenuated for aspirin (0.66; (0.58 to 0.76) to 0.91 (0.80 to 1.03)), non-aspirin antiplatelets (0.74; (0.59 to 0.92) to 0.92 (0.72 to 1.18)), IV-tPA (0.50; (0.41 to 0.62) to 0.65 (0.52 to 0.80)) and stents (0.53 (0.40 to 0.69) to 0.68 (0.49 to 0.94)). Effect estimates remained stable for all other therapies and were similar for 90- and 365-day mortality endpoints.

CONCLUSIONS

We observed inverse associations between receipt of six medications and procedures for MI and all-cause mortality at 30, 90 and 365 days after adjustment for PS. The mortality benefits observed in this population-based setting are consistent with those reported in clinical trials.

摘要

目的

在一个大型的基于社区的经证实的心肌梗死(MI)事件人群中,研究多种医学疗法的生存获益。

设计

回顾性观察队列研究。

设置

在 1987 年至 2008 年期间,作为社区动脉粥样硬化风险研究监测研究的一部分,对四个美国社区中年龄在 35-74 岁的随机抽样的 30986 例确定或可能的 MI 患者进行了基于人群的样本分析。

干预措施

无。

主要观察指标

出院后 30、90 和 365 天的全因死亡率。

结果

我们使用未调整和倾向评分(PS)调整模型来研究药物治疗使用与死亡率之间的关系。在未调整模型中,每种药物和治疗方法与 30 天死亡率呈反比。在 PS 调整后,除静脉组织型纤溶酶原激活剂治疗(IV-tPA)和支架使用外,所有治疗方法的粗生存率获益均减弱。在回归模型中纳入事件期间接受的其他治疗方法后,风险比效应估计值(RR;(95%CI))降低阿司匹林(0.66;(0.58 至 0.76)至 0.91(0.80 至 1.03))、非阿司匹林抗血小板药(0.74;(0.59 至 0.92)至 0.92(0.72 至 1.18))、IV-tPA(0.50;(0.41 至 0.62)至 0.65(0.52 至 0.80))和支架(0.53(0.40 至 0.69)至 0.68(0.49 至 0.94))。所有其他治疗方法的估计值保持稳定,90 天和 365 天的死亡率终点结果相似。

结论

在 PS 调整后,我们观察到 MI 患者接受六种药物和治疗方法与全因死亡率之间呈反比关系,在出院后 30、90 和 365 天均有此结果。在这个基于人群的研究环境中观察到的死亡率获益与临床试验报告的结果一致。

相似文献

1
Medication, reperfusion therapy and survival in a community-based setting of hospitalised myocardial infarction.在以社区为基础的住院心肌梗死患者中,药物治疗、再灌注治疗与生存。
Heart. 2013 Jun;99(11):767-73. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2012-303244. Epub 2013 Mar 2.
2
Coronary stenting plus platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade compared with tissue plasminogen activator in acute myocardial infarction. Stent versus Thrombolysis for Occluded Coronary Arteries in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Study Investigators.急性心肌梗死中冠状动脉支架置入术联合血小板糖蛋白IIb/IIIa阻滞剂与组织型纤溶酶原激活剂的比较。急性心肌梗死患者闭塞冠状动脉支架与溶栓治疗研究组。
N Engl J Med. 2000 Aug 10;343(6):385-91. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200008103430602.
3
Relationship between risk stratification at admission and treatment effects of early invasive management following fibrinolysis: insights from the Trial of Routine ANgioplasty and Stenting After Fibrinolysis to Enhance Reperfusion in Acute Myocardial Infarction (TRANSFER-AMI).溶栓后常规血管成形术和支架置入与增强急性心肌梗死再灌注的临床试验(TRANSFER-AMI):发病时危险分层与溶栓后早期侵入性管理治疗效果的关系。
Eur Heart J. 2011 Aug;32(16):1994-2002. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr008. Epub 2011 Feb 8.
4
Reperfusion therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction and prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery (National Registry of Myocardial Infarction-2).急性心肌梗死合并既往冠状动脉旁路移植术患者的再灌注治疗(心肌梗死全国注册研究-2)
Am J Cardiol. 1999 Dec 1;84(11):1287-91. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)00559-7.
5
A comparison of pharmacologic therapy with/without timely coronary intervention vs. primary percutaneous intervention early after ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the WEST (Which Early ST-elevation myocardial infarction Therapy) study.ST段抬高型心肌梗死后早期药物治疗联合/不联合及时冠状动脉介入治疗与直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的比较:WEST(哪种早期ST段抬高型心肌梗死治疗方法)研究
Eur Heart J. 2006 Jul;27(13):1530-8. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl088. Epub 2006 Jun 6.
6
Randomized comparison of everolimus-eluting stents and sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction: RACES-MI trial.随机比较依维莫司洗脱支架和西罗莫司洗脱支架在 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者中的应用:RACES-MI 试验。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Aug;7(8):849-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.02.016.
7
Mortality Following Cardiovascular and Bleeding Events Occurring Beyond 1 Year After Coronary Stenting: A Secondary Analysis of the Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (DAPT) Study.心血管和出血事件在冠状动脉支架置入 1 年后发生的死亡率:双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)研究的二次分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2017 May 1;2(5):478-487. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.0063.
8
Risk and benefit of dual antiplatelet treatment among non-revascularized myocardial infarction patients in different age groups.非血运重建心肌梗死患者不同年龄组双重抗血小板治疗的风险和获益。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2017 Sep;6(6):511-521. doi: 10.1177/2048872614538848. Epub 2014 Jun 16.
9
ST-segment resolution 60 minutes after combination treatment of abciximab with reteplase or reteplase alone for acute myocardial infarction (30-day mortality results from the resolution of ST-segment after reperfusion therapy substudy).阿昔单抗与瑞替普酶联合治疗或单独使用瑞替普酶治疗急性心肌梗死后60分钟的ST段回落情况(再灌注治疗后ST段回落亚研究的30天死亡率结果)
Am J Cardiol. 2004 Oct 1;94(7):859-63. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.06.018.
10
Characteristics and outcomes of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction excluded from the harmonizing outcomes with revascularization and stents in acute myocardial infarction (HORIZONS-AMI) trial.从经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与支架置入术在急性心肌梗死中改善结局的全球评估(HORIZONS-AMI)试验中排除的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的特征和结局。
Am J Cardiol. 2013 Jan 15;111(2):196-201. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.09.019. Epub 2012 Oct 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Continuous Infusion of Angiotensin IV Protects against Acute Myocardial Infarction via the Inhibition of Inflammation and Autophagy.血管紧张素 IV 持续输注通过抑制炎症和自噬保护急性心肌梗死。
Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2021 Dec 14;2021:2860488. doi: 10.1155/2021/2860488. eCollection 2021.
2
Factors related to the use of reperfusion strategies in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction.老年急性心肌梗死患者再灌注策略使用的相关因素
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014 Jun 20;9:111. doi: 10.1186/1749-8090-9-111.

本文引用的文献

1
Resolving inequalities in care? Reduced mortality in the elderly after acute coronary syndromes. The Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project 2003-2010.解决护理不平等问题?急性冠状动脉综合征后老年人死亡率降低。2003-2010 年心肌缺血国家审计项目。
Eur Heart J. 2012 Mar;33(5):630-9. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr381. Epub 2011 Oct 18.
2
Invited commentary: positivity in practice.特邀评论:实践中的积极性。
Am J Epidemiol. 2010 Mar 15;171(6):674-7; discussion 678-81. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwp436. Epub 2010 Feb 5.
3
A 30-year perspective (1975-2005) into the changing landscape of patients hospitalized with initial acute myocardial infarction: Worcester Heart Attack Study.对因首次急性心肌梗死住院患者情况变化的30年观察(1975 - 2005年):伍斯特心脏病发作研究
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2009 Mar;2(2):88-95. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.108.811828. Epub 2009 Mar 5.
4
Heart disease and stroke statistics--2009 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee.《2009年心脏病和中风统计数据更新:美国心脏协会统计委员会及中风统计小组委员会报告》
Circulation. 2009 Jan 27;119(3):480-6. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.191259.
5
Explaining the decrease in U.S. deaths from coronary disease, 1980-2000.解读1980年至2000年美国冠心病死亡人数的下降情况。
N Engl J Med. 2007 Jun 7;356(23):2388-98. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa053935.
6
External validity of clinical trials in acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死临床试验的外部效度
Arch Intern Med. 2007 Jan 8;167(1):68-73. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.1.68.
7
Addition of clopidogrel to aspirin in 45,852 patients with acute myocardial infarction: randomised placebo-controlled trial.45852例急性心肌梗死患者中氯吡格雷联合阿司匹林治疗:随机安慰剂对照试验。
Lancet. 2005 Nov 5;366(9497):1607-21. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67660-X.
8
Five-year outcomes after coronary stenting versus bypass surgery for the treatment of multivessel disease: the final analysis of the Arterial Revascularization Therapies Study (ARTS) randomized trial.冠状动脉支架置入术与冠状动脉搭桥术治疗多支血管病变的五年疗效:动脉血运重建治疗研究(ARTS)随机试验的最终分析
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Aug 16;46(4):575-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.12.082.
9
Addition of clopidogrel to aspirin and fibrinolytic therapy for myocardial infarction.在心肌梗死的治疗中,将氯吡格雷添加到阿司匹林和纤溶治疗方案中。
N Engl J Med. 2005 Jun 23;352(25):2647-8; author reply 2647-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200506233522518.
10
External validity of randomised controlled trials: "to whom do the results of this trial apply?".随机对照试验的外部效度:“该试验结果适用于谁?”
Lancet. 2005;365(9453):82-93. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17670-8.