Suppr超能文献

在以社区为基础的住院心肌梗死患者中,药物治疗、再灌注治疗与生存。

Medication, reperfusion therapy and survival in a community-based setting of hospitalised myocardial infarction.

机构信息

Duke Clinical Research Institute, 2400 Pratt Street, Room 0311 Terrace Level, Durham, NC 27705, USA.

出版信息

Heart. 2013 Jun;99(11):767-73. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2012-303244. Epub 2013 Mar 2.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine the survival benefit of multiple medical therapies in a large, community-based population of validated myocardial infarction (MI) events.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational cohort study.

SETTING

Population-based sample of 30 986 definite or probable MIs in residents of four US communities aged 35-74 years randomly sampled between 1987 and 2008 as part of the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Surveillance Study.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

All-cause mortality 30, 90 and 365 days after discharge.

RESULTS

We used unadjusted and propensity score (PS) adjusted models to examine the relationship between medical therapy use and mortality. In unadjusted models, each medication and procedure was inversely associated with 30-day mortality. After PS adjustment, the crude survival benefits were attenuated for all therapies except for intravenous tissue plasminogen activator therapy (IV-tPA) and stent use. After inclusion of other therapies received during the event in regression models, risk ratio effect estimates (RR; (95% CI)) were attenuated for aspirin (0.66; (0.58 to 0.76) to 0.91 (0.80 to 1.03)), non-aspirin antiplatelets (0.74; (0.59 to 0.92) to 0.92 (0.72 to 1.18)), IV-tPA (0.50; (0.41 to 0.62) to 0.65 (0.52 to 0.80)) and stents (0.53 (0.40 to 0.69) to 0.68 (0.49 to 0.94)). Effect estimates remained stable for all other therapies and were similar for 90- and 365-day mortality endpoints.

CONCLUSIONS

We observed inverse associations between receipt of six medications and procedures for MI and all-cause mortality at 30, 90 and 365 days after adjustment for PS. The mortality benefits observed in this population-based setting are consistent with those reported in clinical trials.

摘要

目的

在一个大型的基于社区的经证实的心肌梗死(MI)事件人群中,研究多种医学疗法的生存获益。

设计

回顾性观察队列研究。

设置

在 1987 年至 2008 年期间,作为社区动脉粥样硬化风险研究监测研究的一部分,对四个美国社区中年龄在 35-74 岁的随机抽样的 30986 例确定或可能的 MI 患者进行了基于人群的样本分析。

干预措施

无。

主要观察指标

出院后 30、90 和 365 天的全因死亡率。

结果

我们使用未调整和倾向评分(PS)调整模型来研究药物治疗使用与死亡率之间的关系。在未调整模型中,每种药物和治疗方法与 30 天死亡率呈反比。在 PS 调整后,除静脉组织型纤溶酶原激活剂治疗(IV-tPA)和支架使用外,所有治疗方法的粗生存率获益均减弱。在回归模型中纳入事件期间接受的其他治疗方法后,风险比效应估计值(RR;(95%CI))降低阿司匹林(0.66;(0.58 至 0.76)至 0.91(0.80 至 1.03))、非阿司匹林抗血小板药(0.74;(0.59 至 0.92)至 0.92(0.72 至 1.18))、IV-tPA(0.50;(0.41 至 0.62)至 0.65(0.52 至 0.80))和支架(0.53(0.40 至 0.69)至 0.68(0.49 至 0.94))。所有其他治疗方法的估计值保持稳定,90 天和 365 天的死亡率终点结果相似。

结论

在 PS 调整后,我们观察到 MI 患者接受六种药物和治疗方法与全因死亡率之间呈反比关系,在出院后 30、90 和 365 天均有此结果。在这个基于人群的研究环境中观察到的死亡率获益与临床试验报告的结果一致。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

2
Invited commentary: positivity in practice.特邀评论:实践中的积极性。
Am J Epidemiol. 2010 Mar 15;171(6):674-7; discussion 678-81. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwp436. Epub 2010 Feb 5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验