Centre for Health Behaviors Research, School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
J Sex Med. 2013 Mar;10(3):642-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2012.02956.x.
Previous studies suggest the risk of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) transmission among men who have sex with men (MSM) is associated with characteristics of venues. However, very few studies have systematically compared HIV/sexually transmitted disease (STD) prevalence among MSM according to key venue type for sourcing sex partners.
The aim of this study was to investigate the associations between HIV/syphilis prevalence and the types of venues, namely saunas, parks, gay bars, and the Internet, which are mostly used for sourcing male sex partners by MSM in China.
Meta-analyses using fixed-effect and random-effect methods were conducted. Secondary data were obtained from 10 concurrent surveys conducted in 10 cities basing on a common protocol. Pairwise comparisons (e.g., "saunas" vs. "parks") were made.
Odds ratios (OR) for HIV/syphilis infection in relations to venue type for partner sourcing.
The distribution of the most commonly used source to recruit male sex partner was 59.32% (Internet), 18.47% (gay bars), 14.18% (gay saunas), and 8.02% (parks). The median prevalence of HIV/syphilis was 10.49% and 19.38% (gay saunas), 2.12% and 16.25% (parks), 6.06% and 15.45% (Internet), and 4.41% and 11.90% (gay bars). We found significant between-group differences when comparing "sauna" against "Internet" (HIV: OR= 2.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.65-3.12; syphilis: OR = 1.61, 95% CI= 1.07-2.41), "sauna" against "bars" (HIV: OR= 1.65, 95% CI= 1.14-2.39; syphilis: OR= 1.35, 95% CI= 1.02-1.78), and "parks" against "Internet" (syphilis: OR= 1.55, 95% CI= 1.12-2.15) as the main source to recruit male sex partners. Other pairwise comparisons were not statistically significant.
The results of this study suggest that those sourcing partners mainly from gay saunas have higher prevalence of HIV/syphilis when compared with those doing so via the Internet or gay bars. Venue based (sauna-based) interventions using socio-ecological approaches are greatly warranted in order to reduce HIV and syphilis prevalence among MSM in China.
先前的研究表明,男男性行为者(MSM)中人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)的传播风险与场所特征有关。然而,很少有研究根据男男性接触者寻找性伴侣的主要场所类型,系统地比较了 HIV/性传播疾病(STD)的流行率。
本研究旨在调查 HIV/梅毒感染与主要场所类型(桑拿浴室、公园、男同性恋酒吧和互联网)之间的关联,这些场所是中国 MSM 寻找男男性接触者的主要场所。
使用固定效应和随机效应方法进行荟萃分析。二级数据来自基于共同方案在 10 个城市进行的 10 项同期调查。进行了两两比较(例如,“桑拿浴室”与“公园”)。
与寻找伴侣的场所类型相关的 HIV/梅毒感染的优势比(OR)。
最常用来招募男性性伴侣的来源分布为 59.32%(互联网)、18.47%(男同性恋酒吧)、14.18%(男同性恋桑拿浴室)和 8.02%(公园)。HIV/梅毒的中位数流行率分别为 10.49%和 19.38%(男同性恋桑拿浴室)、2.12%和 16.25%(公园)、6.06%和 15.45%(互联网)以及 4.41%和 11.90%(男同性恋酒吧)。当比较“桑拿浴室”与“互联网”(HIV:OR=2.27,95%置信区间[CI] = 1.65-3.12;梅毒:OR=1.61,95%CI=1.07-2.41)、“桑拿浴室”与“酒吧”(HIV:OR=1.65,95%CI=1.14-2.39;梅毒:OR=1.35,95%CI=1.02-1.78)以及“公园”与“互联网”(梅毒:OR=1.55,95%CI=1.12-2.15)时,我们发现了组间存在显著差异,这是招募男性性伴侣的主要来源。其他两两比较没有统计学意义。
本研究结果表明,与通过互联网或男同性恋酒吧寻找伴侣的人相比,主要从男同性恋桑拿浴室寻找伴侣的人 HIV/梅毒的流行率更高。为了降低中国男男性接触者中的 HIV 和梅毒流行率,迫切需要基于场所(以桑拿浴室为基础)的、采用社会生态方法的干预措施。